Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
48 minutes ago, Ithan Henry said:

I don't mind the playoffs, but the whole playoff point system annoys me.  So you're a fan of having them do pit road like qualifying for the All-Star race.  That would be interesting to see.

It used to be that way. One person gets hurt they stop it. It’s all about car control. Part of racing. They used to able to change engines too. Stopped that too. They’re making it like a video game. I like the format for the next few races. No practice or qualifying. That will be exciting.

Posted
3 hours ago, KARNUT said:

pit road speed limits

Like it or not, kind of a necessary evil to save life's

 

Agree with the playoff's and the stage crap 100 percent, don't need, nor do I like it, makes it way to confusing even for veteran fans.

Posted
5 hours ago, KARNUT said:

I don’t like the play offs, stages or pit road speed limits. They haven’t lost me yet.

They lost me when they were no longer 'stock cars'. So it's been awhile since I Oggled over NASCAR.  Same with NHRA "Pro Stock" has nothing to do with stock but a look. Use to have rules that stated motors needed to be based on CURRENT stock configurations. Use factory platforms and so on. 

 

Still I loved T/F and AA/FC...that is until they started forcing payment above the premium. That is, you buy a dish package to get the channel. Then you have to pay for a premium channel to watch that channel which goes to the final round then you have to pay again to watch final rounds on a web based channel. Yea...greed kills it all eventually. 

 

I watch none of it anymore. The death of Indy was about all I could take. Cookie cutter cars and everyone gets a participation trophy. Children throwing tantrums.....buzzzzzz killerrrrrrrrrrrrrr 

  • Like 1
Posted

So on a side note, it looks like Georgia's numbers have been staying steady since their re-opening.  That's a positive.  Looks like the warmer weather is helping keep it under control.  Maybe we'll get lucky up here in the northeast and have some consistent warmer weather so we can open up soon.

  • Like 1
Posted

Why does no one argue over flu death counts? Or any other death count for that matter?  

?

 

Never heard anyone argue over deaths counts assigned to smoking.

:pimp:

  • Like 2
Posted

Because it's not blown up into the media??

 

What's the avg up to now, like 7,000-8,000 death per day in the US from various causes. We don't know how much more or less that avg has changes because there are less deaths from work related causes, car crashes etc etc. But on the other hand we also don't know how many deaths could have been prevented as this country shifted everything towards covid patients.

 

On the topic of smoking. If you smoked, you knew what you were doing to yourself. People I know never argue about people that die from it, that's their own damn fault. We just argue about why someone that did that to themselves doesn't have to pay a higher price to get health care and things of that nature. They brought the health problems onto themselves and the people that rarely or never have to go to the doctor or hospital still pay what they do.

 

Maybe it could be like car insurance. You drive a Corvette, you are considered a higher risk because it's value is greater and it goes pretty damn fast. The guy in the Civic won't pay what he does. So the smoker is higher risk and should pay more.

  • Like 2
Posted

Some states are changing the way they add the covid 19 deaths. Instead of everything being because of. There’s with or because of.  With so many people, they are learning have it and don’t know it. So if you get hit by a cement truck and have covid 19. You probably died from the truck. 

Posted
On 5/15/2020 at 2:09 AM, davester said:

So, which "Bible" did you prove to yourself to be "perfect and without error"?  There's the original text, written in a variety of languages, then there are a variety of translations of those texts into other languages, and then some translations of those translations.

 

And I'll just give you the bits that involve predictions of what happens in the future.

Don't forget all the books that didn't make it into the Bible because their theology didn't align with the Council of Nicea's.

Posted
On 5/15/2020 at 5:47 AM, Silverado4x4 said:

Tell me all these numbers aint bull$hit, man dies from alcohol poisoning listed as covid due to him having it but it wasn't the cause of death the numbers are being inflated so bad.  Read on.  https://www.foxnews.com/health/colorado-man-died-alcohol-poisoning-death-classified-coronavirus-report

 

One more thing, lets keep religion out of this and stay on topic.

A man gets shot in the chest. He runs back into his burning house, inhaling smoke and carbon monoxide as he goes. The roof collapses on top of him. What killed him? 

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, CamGTP said:

Maybe it could be like car insurance. You drive a Corvette, you are considered a higher risk because it's value is greater and it goes pretty damn fast. The guy in the Civic won't pay what he does. So the smoker is higher risk and should pay more.

Don't they already do it that way? My health/ life insurance plan through work has a question on the form for if I'm a smoker or not. 

Posted

Of course some do but you could assume maybe some don't. Say you didn't have life insurance and just health insurance, to me it's easy to lie about being a smoker. A doctor and lie detector test isn't in the room with you when you look at those papers or computer screen. A smoker could just say no they don't smoke and end up saving money. Doing that would be at their own risk and I'd think some would do it.

 

My work has that question and if you say no you get a slight discount, so instead of $90 per pay check it's $65. But it's so easy to lie and that's the problem. I realize the enforcement of this and figure out exactly who does and doesn't would be tough but I think most get what I am after here.

Posted
44 minutes ago, CamGTP said:

Of course some do but you could assume maybe some don't. Say you didn't have life insurance and just health insurance, to me it's easy to lie about being a smoker. A doctor and lie detector test isn't in the room with you when you look at those papers or computer screen. A smoker could just say no they don't smoke and end up saving money. Doing that would be at their own risk and I'd think some would do it.

 

My work has that question and if you say no you get a slight discount, so instead of $90 per pay check it's $65. But it's so easy to lie and that's the problem. I realize the enforcement of this and figure out exactly who does and doesn't would be tough but I think most get what I am after here.

But then as soon as you end up in hospital with lung cancer, your insurance company realizes you lied and takes away your coverage. 

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,902
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Newest Member
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 360 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Its no wonder you've gravitated to the oil types and brands you have in later years after trying certain brands and one being a specialty oil or at least very hard to come by up here and the other would have been a commonly found oil of the era and the vastly different outcomes as a result to using the vehicles in question the same distance for an OCI . It shows what marketing hype can do without actually having the product to back up the claims and that is no different now with the insane claims that are written on the side of a bottle of oil from some of the off the shelf oils.    What has surprised me and I was already finding this out before I bought my truck with the GDI engine, that this newer fancy technology that seemingly would suggest better fuel economy/emissions with this high pressure spray of fuel is not in reality kind at all to the engine or at least the oils life. Yet they insist on claiming long OCI with this technology just like they did with the port or similar type fuel injection systems when in reality its a step back in oil life to have a GDI system.    I think the mistake your making Grumpy is that your not sending your samples to Blackstone and getting the feel good glowing report that you can run it another 1000 or more miles and then send another sample where they say run it yet another 1000 miles and on and on it goes until your sending in something that looks a lot like road tar and then they may suggest you change your oil within the next 1000 miles 😆
    • I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 
    • In the 80's 90's I'd run Honda's 7,500 miles between changes using Red Line HP 5W20 and do it for hundreds of thousands of miles with issues. Back in the day it was an SAE 20 with the HTHS of a SAE 30 and SN add load. It was also very polar. Oxidation VOA was over 120. Besides those motors were SPFI and lean burn tech. I could have likely run it longer but never did.    We had a Toyota bought new I ran on Pennzoil's latest and greatest synthetic of the day with "Penthane". A made up word for a very low dose of PAO. Tried 7,500 mile OCI's in that Group III/VI chemistry and the rings tapped out at 90K. Rocker box wasn't as bad as the one Punch put up but it wasn't good either. Also a SPFI motor.    I'm around 3,750 across the board on these GDI monsters and the oil it tapped out by then usually on TBN/TAN crossover and color. Red Line HP Euro.    The AMSOIL SS brochures tell you to follow the OEM values for the service class but that it can be run up to 25K if monitored. I can't imagine what motor could go that distance and not tap out. I've never owned one.    Yes, I know. Lot's of people do. I'm just not going to be one of them. 
    • I knew a guy in the early 80's that bought a new Monte Carlo and ran it a 100,000 miles without ever changing the filter or the oil. Just kept adding. It looked like that inside.     
    • Good evening. I was lucky enough to get passed down to me a 2007 GMC LBZ that was my great uncle's. While the underside and rockers are more or less gone I feel like with time I can restore it to working order since it only has 110,000 miles and he put nearly every option he could get without getting the new body style since he did not trust DEF. So far I have done everything I can think of but when I put the key into the ignition nothing happens. I put 2 brand new batteries in it. Cleaned the terminals. Check all the fuses and relays and they all pass with my multimeter. I know I'm missing something that I just cant think of. The only odd thing is the OBD2 port works which makes me think its not the mega fuse. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...