Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

What is a pointless comparison is this to seasonal flu.

This is now the 4th deadliest non war year in US history. 

Soon will be the third. 

 

H1N1 1918 675,000 dead USA 

H2H2 1957 116,000 dead USA

H3N2 1968  68,000 dead USA

2SARS 2020 60,726 dead USA and counting.

H1N1 2009  12,469 dead USA mutation of 1918 strain. 

 

More people have died of COVID-19 than Small Pox, Yellow Fever, Cholera, Scarlet Fever, Typhoid, Diphtheria, Polio, Measles, Whooping cough or HIV for any given year and it's been done in a fraction of time no matter what data you use for the start. 

 

This is a NEW virus. NOBODY has it dead ringer. We know NOTHING. 

 

What is pointless is to act as if "We have this". Not just pointless but dangerous. 

 

More pointless comparisons:

 

37,000 deaths per year due to Motor Vehicle Accidents in USA - No Shutdown.

88,000 Alcohol related deaths in the USA - No Shutdown, alcohol still legal.

862,000 deaths due to abortion - No Shutdown and still legal.

21 hours ago, Thejet07 said:

I assumed this stuff went on so I'm not surprised, but it seems hard to believe this current situation isn't somehow related to the funding/research mentioned in this article.

Posted

Arguing over what was is pointless. This is the first time a shut down was done. The comparison between this virus and shutdown should be front and center. We’re seeing antibody testing and increase regular testing possible changing outcomes of percentages. That should be a good thing. Living in unreasonable fear is a bad thing. The original comparison to other flu events was reasonable. If for nothing else people became more aware how deadly it can be. The people who keep pushing unreasonable fear when it’s becoming increasingly possible or likely is less so. The damage to our way of life is at stake. This is a country of choice. This socialist experience should be over. You want to stay home, do it. I get it. I’m armed with information. I’m ready for it to be over.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Posted
I assumed this stuff went on so I'm not surprised, but it seems hard to believe this current situation isn't somehow related to the funding/research mentioned in this article.

Crazy right? I can’t believe nobody replied to this besides you.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted
Arguing over what was is pointless. This is the first time a shut down was done. The comparison between this virus and shutdown should be front and center. We’re seeing antibody testing and increase regular testing possible changing outcomes of percentages. That should be a good thing. Living in unreasonable fear is a bad thing. The original comparison to other flu events was reasonable. If for nothing else people became more aware how deadly it can be. The people who keep pushing unreasonable fear when it’s becoming increasingly possible or likely is less so. The damage to our way of life is at stake. This is a country of choice. This socialist experience should be over. You want to stay home, do it. I get it. I’m armed with information. I’m ready for it to be over.
 
 
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
But my statty sticks showed that coronavirus is worse than the flu!

[emoji23]

Sent from my SM-J810F using Tapatalk

Posted
4 hours ago, mikemcclain8 said:

More pointless comparisons:

37,000 deaths per year due to Motor Vehicle Accidents in USA - No Shutdown.

88,000 Alcohol related deaths in the USA - No Shutdown, alcohol still legal.

862,000 deaths due to abortion - No Shutdown and still legal.

The death comparison was apple to apples.

Posted

Prisons and jails are a bad situation.  Social distancing, forget about it.  The bigger problem though is not the inmates, it's having enough staff to remain healthy.  Most only received PPE a few weeks ago.

Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, HeySkippyDog said:

But my statty sticks showed that coronavirus is worse than the flu!

emoji23.png

Sent from my SM-J810F using Tapatalk
 

I hope so!  There's a vaccine for the flu.  We're "naked" with this Wu-Flu.

Edited by BigBlueLB756
Posted
But my statty sticks showed that coronavirus is worse than the flu!

[emoji23]

Sent from my SM-J810F using Tapatalk


You bet. Ask the 30 million and counting who lost their jobs.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
5 hours ago, KARNUT said:

Arguing over what was is pointless. This is the first time a shut down was done. The comparison between this virus and shutdown should be front and center. We’re seeing antibody testing and increase regular testing possible changing outcomes of percentages. That should be a good thing. Living in unreasonable fear is a bad thing. The original comparison to other flu events was reasonable. If for nothing else people became more aware how deadly it can be. The people who keep pushing unreasonable fear when it’s becoming increasingly possible or likely is less so. The damage to our way of life is at stake. This is a country of choice. This socialist experience should be over. You want to stay home, do it. I get it. I’m armed with information. I’m ready for it to be over.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Now that they're doing more testing, yes, they should start opening up the country.  But it's something we need to ease into.  For instance, I wouldn't open up Las Vegas like the mayor wants to.  Too populated and the risk is just too high.  Other places that can maintain social distancing, absolutely, open them up.  I'm happy to see NJ opening up the parks and golf courses again.  It's easy to social distance in those types of places.

Posted (edited)
On 4/22/2020 at 2:32 PM, The Zip said:

Unless large numbers of consumers see some testing numbers past 1% and or a vaccine is available, they are not going to mingle. Economic recovery from my perspective is not going to be dependent on employees going back to work, it's going to be dependent on if consumers have the confidence to go out and buy. 

 

3 hours ago, Ithan Henry said:

Now that they're doing more testing, yes, they should start opening up the country. 

LA city told all their residents they could go get a test. The mayor said they could test 18k per day, no limit how many times you can test.  This can give someone like me the confidence to go out and spend.

Edited by The Zip
Posted
Now that they're doing more testing, yes, they should start opening up the country.  But it's something we need to ease into.  For instance, I wouldn't open up Las Vegas like the mayor wants to.  Too populated and the risk is just too high.  Other places that can maintain social distancing, absolutely, open them up.  I'm happy to see NJ opening up the parks and golf courses again.  It's easy to social distance in those types of places.

Casinos would be easy. Every one wears a mask. Plenty of hand sanitizer. Most tables games can be managed by the dealer. They could limit the amount of people. I have played every table game blind it’s possible. The key is masks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

As reported on Tucker Carlson. The WHO is supporting the Swedens Model on the Coronavirus. Saying it was the right approach. I wonder if that changes some people’s mind on this organization? Or are they finally getting it right? There is a second showing Tucker Carlson later tonight.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Of course *ucker misunderstood what the one guy from the WHO said (which of course, may or may not be different from what the organization as a body is saying).  The guy didn't say we should have been more like Sweden all along, but to move more towards what Sweden is doing (as in, slowly opening up the economy).

 

And note that Sweden has a MUCH high death rate than all the other countries around it, and it's not like it's the land of the old and sick people.

  • Like 1
Posted
Of course *ucker misunderstood what the one guy from the WHO said (which of course, may or may not be different from what the organization as a body is saying).  The guy didn't say we should have been more like Sweden all along, but to move more towards what Sweden is doing (as in, slowly opening up the economy).
 
And note that Sweden has a MUCH high death rate than all the other countries around it, and it's not like it's the land of the old and sick people.

When it came to the show you missed the whole point of the segment. From you I wouldn’t expect anything else. I’m not going to try to explain it. Also for obvious reasons.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I tried before I updated the scan tool just incase an update messed it up, but it never worked so I updated the scan tool and it still didn't work.   Only difference is I click on Sierra not Chevrolet cause I have a Sierra.   If I click on 2026-2024 I didn't have any option to change placard, when I click on 2023 it does give me the option but when I try to do it,.it says vehicle not supported!   I have my region or market or whatever it is set to America I think, is that what yours is set to?
    • Its just that it worked on 2024 trucks on this forum and my 2025 model truck, unless GM did something since that point to screw up access or Autel has a bad update. I haven't had need to use my tool since last year when I did the changes to the placard pressure settings and since then I updated the software on my Autel but have not plugged into the OBD so hard to say if I would get a surprise as well.    All I know last year when I bought the Autel I was warned to be sure to update it before I tried using the unit as they said who knows how long ago unit itself was actually manufactured as the software could be way out of date. 
    • And so you had gone through the process of registering and updating the tool and so on ?. All I can say is that on the front page as the tool fires up you go to advanced mode, then vehicle model comes up and you choose Silverado ( not the DRW or EV  since your a single rear wheel ) , then I think its choice 2 which is 07/2021 - 12/2026 ( 433mhz 13542523 ) as that is the series of tpms sensors and then go down to choice 5 which is tire type/pressure selection. Hit yes and it says to connect to OBD port and turn ignition on.    Having said this, I updated the software in my tool lately and these year range choices look different from the past due to them doing some updates it would appear and I have not connected up to the OBD port since last year so hopefully I am not in for a surprise with them screwing up the software and that it won't work on my truck anymore either.    So my question is, when you plugged into the OBD and started your truck it had that message on the Autel screen "vehicle not supported" ?. That does seem odd as tire shops would be pissed right off if hey can't use their tool on the model year after mine that in theory is supposed to be much the same truck ... unless GM did some change in the computer system to block certain things from access. 
    • Understanding and using modern scan tools is its own body of knowledge. I had little hope that would work...programming access to the BCM is probably required and that is not easy for us consumers. Expensive scan tool, GM programming subscription, online authentication, etc.   It also may be a matter of finding the right dealer to program it for you. Flashing a modern BCM might be a little too advanced for most tire shops.
    • Update for anyone following:    Installed everything as shown in diagram. Opted for 8 AWG from Battery Positive to a 50A resettable inline breaker. 8 AWG is tied into to 2x 12 AWG wires feeding a 6 way fuse bus in parallel (manufacturer’s design of what I purchased).    4 of the 6 fuses available for circuits are tied to terminal 30 of each relay. I tied a jumper from one of my spare circuits off the bus to terminal 86 of each relay. The trigger, terminal 85, was pulled from my interior by way of T-Taps from the X61A-X5 pins 10, 11, 17 and 23. This was the hardest part of the job. Even with the X61A unbolted and the X5 removed - there was VERY little wiggle room.  I added back up lights that I want to come on with my cargo lamp - but when I would check continuity between S48A-X1 pin 18 to its respective landing point on the X61A-X5 it triggers the factory relay… Instead I opted for a add-a-fuse on the passenger interior fuse panel (fuse location 10 - cargo lamp) and ran it through the boot on the driver side to my load. Did this to avoid introducing any electrical gremlins.   Note: Please check for continuity between the S48A-X1 and the X61A-X5. In my case wire colours were not the same as other’s who have posted. To do a continuity check you need a Multimeter. Completely disassemble the S48A-X1 and remove the brown face plate off the X61A-X5 by way of a flat head screwdriver - this was the only way I could get any results.   The outputs, terminal 87 of the relays, were fed into a junction box and landed at Individual studs and were labelled Aux 1-4.    At this point, all you need to do is run wire to your loads and bring them to ground. I created a negative bus in the engine bay, all my negatives land here.    For anyone having issues with all of your new aux switch lights coming on with the press of one - I noticed this only to be an issue when the battery wasn’t hooked up to my relays? No idea why, but it was quickly corrected by having my system buttoned up and functional.     
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...