Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Here's a crazy idea that I had about re-opening the country.  If a person wants to go out and take a chance that they get infected with COVID-19, because they really needed a haircut or just had to go into that casino, then there are consequences if they do get infected.  They get placed on the bottom of the list for medical treatment, no matter how severe the symptoms.  Their insurance doesn't cover the cost, because they disregarded social distancing recommendations. 

 

And this is absolutely reasonable, because if you're willing to run the risk, then that risk shouldn't become a financial burden for an insurance company or medical facility.  People at high risk pay higher premiums for both health and life insurance.  If you still want coverage to take that risk, then be prepared to pay a significantly higher premium for your insurance.

 

Any takers?  Still wanna risk it under these conditions?

  • Like 1
Posted
Here's a crazy idea that I had about re-opening the country.  If a person wants to go out and take a chance that they get infected with COVID-19, because they really needed a haircut or just had to go into that casino, then there are consequences if they do get infected.  They get placed on the bottom of the list for medical treatment, no matter how severe the symptoms.  Their insurance doesn't cover the cost, because they disregarded social distancing recommendations. 
 
And this is absolutely reasonable, because if you're willing to run the risk, then that risk shouldn't become a financial burden for an insurance company or medical facility.  People at high risk pay higher premiums for both health and life insurance.  If you still want coverage to take that risk, then be prepared to pay a significantly higher premium for your insurance.
 
Any takers?  Still wanna risk it under these conditions?

Well first off there appears to be more infected people who didn’t realize it than originally thought. So let’s take your thoughts a-bit farther. And add other at risk as you call it behavior. So you’re insurance will cover you at one price to only go back and forth to work. Any extra driving for anything other you pay more money. All you have to do is consent to is tracking. And they get to say what at risk behavior is. You gamed? There’s lots of things that can be done and still social distance. You give an business owner an opportunity, they’ll surprise people. This isn’t a one size fits all.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
It stopped being informative, and veered into stupid & dangerous, when Chump started spitballing.  Smart people stop talking once they are out of information.  s.m.r.t. people keep going.

Yes I see

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
21 minutes ago, Ithan Henry said:

Here's a crazy idea that I had about re-opening the country.  If a person wants to go out and take a chance that they get infected with COVID-19, because they really needed a haircut or just had to go into that casino, then there are consequences if they do get infected.  They get placed on the bottom of the list for medical treatment, no matter how severe the symptoms.  Their insurance doesn't cover the cost, because they disregarded social distancing recommendations. 

 

And this is absolutely reasonable, because if you're willing to run the risk, then that risk shouldn't become a financial burden for an insurance company or medical facility.  People at high risk pay higher premiums for both health and life insurance.  If you still want coverage to take that risk, then be prepared to pay a significantly higher premium for your insurance.

 

Any takers?  Still wanna risk it under these conditions?

Same could go for people who won't wear helmets on motorcycles.  Sign a waiver that says the ER won't treat you.  What about people who eat fast food?  Lowest on the list for cardiac care?

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, mikemcclain8 said:

Same could go for people who won't wear helmets on motorcycles.  Sign a waiver that says the ER won't treat you.  What about people who eat fast food?  Lowest on the list for cardiac care?

Absolutely.  When you get life insurance all of these things are factored into your premium.  My policy prohibits me from racing SCCA which I used to do.  I pay a higher premium for my wife's pre-existing condition so yeah, let's even the playing field.  

  • Like 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, KARNUT said:


Well first off there appears to be more infected people who didn’t realize it than originally thought. So let’s take your thoughts a-bit farther. And add other at risk as you call it behavior. So you’re insurance will cover you at one price to only go back and forth to work. Any extra driving for anything other you pay more money. All you have to do is consent to is tracking. And they get to say what at risk behavior is. You gamed? There’s lots of things that can be done and still social distance. You give an business owner an opportunity, they’ll surprise people. This isn’t a one size fits all.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm game.  Lets not pretend that we're not already being tracked by our cell phones or modern day vehicles.  As for risk behavior, sure, give me a list so I can determine if it's worth it to me.  There's been so much talk about how the economy and how it's being hurt.  If we open up the economy again and there's a surge of people in hospitals, won't that tank the insurance companies that have to pay for the services?  Or how about people that can't afford insurance and would potentially have huge medical bills to pay.  They're financially burdened and if they never pay, then those providing the services are now burdened. 

  • Like 1
Posted
I'm game.  Lets not pretend that we're not already being tracked by our cell phones or modern day vehicles.  As for risk behavior, sure, give me a list so I can determine if it's worth it to me.  There's been so much talk about how the economy and how it's being hurt.  If we open up the economy again and there's a surge of people in hospitals, won't that tank the insurance companies that have to pay for the services?  Or how about people that can't afford insurance and would potentially have huge medical bills to pay.  They're financially burdened and if they never pay, then those providing the services are now burdened. 

So far it appears the government is already under writing most of this. If the states go by the phases they’ll probably under right that too. Remember most of the people going forward who are most at risk are people who should stay home. We’re finally getting away from the first wave. The ones who weren’t warned. Now we know. We can proceed with caution.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, KARNUT said:


So far it appears the government is already under writing most of this. If the states go by the phases they’ll probably under right that too. Remember most of the people going forward who are most at risk are people who should stay home. We’re finally getting away from the first wave. The ones who weren’t warned. Now we know. We can proceed with caution.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Agreed.  With Georgia opening up today, we'll find out how the southern states should fare with warmer climates.  I hope everything goes well, cause I've got family down there and Georgia is a beautiful state to visit.

  • Like 1
Posted
20 hours ago, j-ten-ner said:

I think that you missed the point.

Nah I didn't miss it.  I'm a pretty good shot.  :P

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

The story of the malaria drug rolls on. It may be not as affected as originally hoped. In the beginning there was nothing to battle the bug. It shows promise. An excited president makes it known about the encouraging reports. Oh Oh, the kiss of death. Trump encouraging the drug. Now the opposition has to find a way to discourage its use and demonized the president. Even if there’s just a percentage it helped. It helped. The only thing I may add. If you had stage 4 lung cancer, would you take chemotherapy? Look up those odds and side effects, brutal. I’ve seen it, not pretty.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
43 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

The story of the malaria drug rolls on. It may be not as affected as originally hoped. In the beginning there was nothing to battle the bug. It shows promise. An excited president makes it known about the encouraging reports. Oh Oh, the kiss of death. Trump encouraging the drug. Now the opposition has to find a way to discourage its use and demonized the president. Even if there’s just a percentage it helped. It helped. The only thing I may add. If you had stage 4 lung cancer, would you take chemotherapy? Look up those odds and side effects, brutal. I’ve seen it, not pretty.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

There seems to be a shortage of the hydroxycloroquine now, which is a new problem for people that were actually taking it for lupus.  

 

https://www.lupus.org/news/fda-recognizes-hydroxychloroquine-and-chloroquine-shortages

 

Trump causes all of his own problems.  If he were willing to admit when he's wrong, instead of diverting the blame or claiming that he was misunderstood, then he'd get more support.  I'm not saying everyone, obviously there are people that won't change their minds and that's on both sides.  And I'm not just referencing this pandemic.  For the past 3 years he has yet to admit any mistakes on his part.  It's always someone else's fault.  All great leaders admit their shortcomings and try to grow from them.  All past presidents have done this.  Unfortunately, Trump is incapable of owning up to his mistakes and this has and always will cause friction with the media.

  • Like 1
Posted
There seems to be a shortage of the hydroxycloroquine now, which is a new problem for people that were actually taking it for lupus.  
 
https://www.lupus.org/news/fda-recognizes-hydroxychloroquine-and-chloroquine-shortages
 
Trump causes all of his own problems.  If he were willing to admit when he's wrong, instead of diverting the blame or claiming that he was misunderstood, then he'd get more support.  I'm not saying everyone, obviously there are people that won't change their minds and that's on both sides.  And I'm not just referencing this pandemic.  For the past 3 years he has yet to admit any mistakes on his part.  It's always someone else's fault.  All great leaders admit their shortcomings and try to grow from them.  All past presidents have done this.  Unfortunately, Trump is incapable of owning up to his mistakes and this has and always will cause friction with the media.

After at least 3 unfounded investigations. He has no choice to act the way he does. They’re gearing up for 2 more presently. Showing any kind of weakness, kiss of death.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, KARNUT said:


After at least 3 unfounded investigations. He has no choice to act the way he does. They’re gearing up for 2 more presently. Showing any kind of weakness, kiss of death.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

He acted like this his entire life. And admitting one's mistakes is not a weakness.

 

Just saw the president say that he sarcastically made the comments about disinfectants to see what the press would say.  What would he expect people to do when he makes those statements?

 

Birx said the president made the comments because he hadn't fully digested the scientific info he was briefed on.

 

The new press secretary said the media irresponsibly took his statements out of context.

 

They really need to sit down and get their story straight.

Edited by Ithan Henry
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, Ithan Henry said:

He acted like this his entire life. And admitting one's mistakes is not a weakness.

Just saw the president say that he sarcastically made the comments about disinfectants to see what the press would say.  What would he expect people to do when he makes those statements?

Birx said the president made the comments because he hadn't fully digested the scientific info he was briefed on.

The new press secretary said the media irresponsibly took his statements out of context.

They really need to sit down and get their story straight.

I normally like bits and pieces of a post because they ramble on too long.  But everything here are good points.  As for the virus, there are tons of viruses, most not as deadly as others, but that is not the reason I will sit tight.  Lack of satisfactory information and testing on behalf of this virus will cause me to sit tight. 

 

Sidebar; I saw a picture of Trump throwing down a box of Clorox chewables,  based on the context just thought that was pretty funny.

Edited by The Zip
  • Like 1
Posted

He likes to throw things around to get feed back. His mistake was doing it around the unfriendly. The middle finger to the press tonight was priceless, by not taking questions. My last political post tonight before I get a warning.[emoji106]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,958
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    B07
    Newest Member
    B07
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 877 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Looks like it's riveted to me. What is wrong with that 1? Welcome to the Forum!
    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
    • Looking for this part for my truck. They don't sell just that one piece and to get it you have to pay over $100 even used for the whole air tube. The piece the hose clamp snaps into that is held on by the screw and nut. If anyone has access to one please let me know.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...