Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was looking at the engine in my 2020 GMC this past weekend and noticed that the front edge, at the center of the hood, has a removable piece.

I looked at it more and the area just behind it has a chamber, that is sort of slotted on the bottom to allow air to enter from the grill.

The inlet for the air filter is way off to the right.

It almost reminds me of my 75 Trans Am, that had a plate on the back of the shaker hood that could be removed and that would increased airflow to the carb and the Q jet low frequency tone noise could exit.

I am going to take mine off of the GMC and see if it sounds better or anything -anyone already done this?  

GMC Hood1.jpg

GMC Hood2.jpg

GMC Hood3.jpg

GMC Hood4.jpg

Posted

If there’s cutouts behind that I would imagine that it helps block airflow and push to the driver’s side where the forced air is pushed to the intake, so taking it off may negatively affect it and the cutouts are just going into the hood and not intake anyways.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I’m gonna guess it does nothing unless there out cutouts to let the air through. Looks like air has no place to go once it enters. Unless it’s supposed to do a 180 and flow out the front (holes that aren’t covered)?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Posted

Nothing more than a composite design to reinforce a thin aluminum hood. Wouldn't make much of deflecting a cold airflow supply as an aluminum heat sink sucking up heat from the engine and hot Summer Sun.

Posted (edited)

So the way it works out is that when you remove this piece, it leaves it totally open where it was plugged by the plastic filler -it is not a diverter etc., it just blocks this space, making it look like an opening.

When removed, air can enter that gap and get into the section just behind it with the slots in the bottom.

The rear of this space has the second seal to the hood, so noting gets to the under hood area behind it.

It looks like the slots in the bottom of this space, and some of the hole on the leading edge of the hood, are the normal path for the air flow -eventually finding the opening way up and over to the right DS.

With this gap open, the air would be Rammed into this chamber and get to the filter inlet faster?

And since the filter inlet is so far to the right DS, rain or snow wouldn't be entering.

Not saying it would make a big difference, but it is interesting that it is designed this way.

If you have a 2019 or 2010 GMC take a look and see if this makes sense.

Edited by Glava2876
  • 1 year later...
Posted

I didn't read through the string so apologize up front if already answered. I think the ram air is only functional in the diesel model. The diesel needs the extra air but the gas model doesn't. I think there is a special designed chamber in the diesel intake to separate the rain water and debris from entering the engine. Removing the blocked vent on a gas engine is likely to just dump rain and snow on your engine when driving in inclement weather.  

 

As a side note, I hate the hood design on the GMC 2500. I wish they would remove the pretend scoop and make the hood lower. It would give better visibility. I think this poor visibility will be a big problem when snow plowing. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,980
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Fishboat
    Newest Member
    Fishboat
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 605 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hey guys, sorry for the confusison about this. This wasn't my experainnce, it was copied and pasted fom the net. 
    • The problem with failure rates or increase failures are there’s people who don’t have a problem. What are you doing wrong they say. We had 4 5.7 GM diesel’s in the family when they came out. One was flawless. My uncle who happened to be the most abusive. Early rotary engines were known to use oil. I abused my first car so bad in six months I replaced the clutch, transmission and rear end. It didn’t use oil. My brother in law has a 2013 Tahoe and an older Yukon. The Yukon has 280K miles. The Tahoe around 175K. He runs them to about 300K. If his lifters fail before that time he would consider it a failure. My Hondas, I know people hate it when I mention them. Identical engines. One with cylinder deactivation one doesn’t have it. One shudders when the eco light goes on or off. Cylinder deactivation. But wait! According to the web. It can happen with lock up too. So now people in the know are changing the oil and transmission fluid more often. Then you read it could be a programing issue. So what do you do? There’s lots of money involved. I see three ways to deal with it. One only works if you don’t drive lots of miles. Lease, never get out of warranty. Or only buy older vehicles with a good track record. They all have bad runs. Usually when there’s a change. Even Toyota and Honda. 
    • Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...