Jump to content

DFM disable?

Jmccracken1214
 Share

Recommended Posts

Transient Senior Enthusiast

Transient

Posted
Posted
On 5/1/2020 at 9:43 AM, Thomcat said:

Early AFM systems developed oil burning problems caused by the discharge oil spray in the sump on nearby cylinders clogging the oil rings.In addition there were problems with the collapsible lifters of time oil problems at 60K+ and lifters at around 100K miles. Solenoids were never the problem, in fact the LOMA manifold with its own screen clogging problems, exclusive to AFM engines also uses them for the 4 AFM cylinders. Post 1/11 AFM production has addressed these problems with modified valve cover, modified PCV system, baffle over the AFM oil discharge valve, and a new gen of collapsible lifters less prone to damage caused dirty oil. Later volume increase of 5.3l sump capacity from 6 to 8 qts has also helped to extend oil life.

 

Here's my .02 opinion, take it for what it is worth. Had AFMs on my 3 Avalanches and '16 Silverado and by comparison the DFM system is totally seamless. I used the Range device in my '07 Avalanche because it had the early system with valve cover, lifter, PCV and AFM discharge problems. Never used it on the later ones nor will I use one on the '19 DFM because as far as I'm concerned there is no long term data on the new DFM system, talking years not accelerated studies, on use of a defeat device vs. use without one. Got to figure it has to be pulled periodically whenever car is taken for service, State inspections, grabbing codes for the EL, etc. Dealer spots it and no more electrical warranty.

 

The AFM and DFM engines are designed for operation on a varying number of cylinders and the solenoids along with the collapsible lifters are designed to flex thousand of times during each drive cycle. So I'd like to know what the effects would be of keeping the oil control solenoids idle or maybe worse open under constant voltage for an extended period....heat buildup?, varnish deposits inside tappets?....and what happens to collapsible lifters that remain in the one position for very long periods when the device is removed for inspection or service and they expand/collapse and jamb with accumulated varnish buildup in a static area? And what of variability of vehicle builds and that any particular gizmo will play friendly with each and every module programming in your particular vehicle as equipped ?.

 

I don't know and I don't think GM knows either since a DFM engine is barely 2 years old plus was not designed for usage in that manner......but I don't have to because system works just fine as is, plenty of pep and seamless operation.......and it makes no sense to fix something that isn't broken.

This is the nice way to put it.  Glad you wrote this post.  I'm not as forgiving.  I'm more blunt.  Why would anybody buy the truck if it has a design from the factory you think will fail?  Are Nissan, Toyota, Ford, and Ram even worse?  I doubt it, therefore people are just complaining for the sake of complaining.

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, Transient said:

This is the nice way to put it.  Glad you wrote this post.  I'm not as forgiving.  I'm more blunt.  Why would anybody buy the truck if it has a design from the factory you think will fail?  Are Nissan, Toyota, Ford, and Ram even worse?  I doubt it, therefore people are just complaining for the sake of complaining.

They wouldn’t, once burned. My whole family was GM in the 60s and 70s. The 5.7 diesel drove some away. The 6.5 in trucks drove the rest. We drove 7.3 and 5.9s after. The we went back to gas after the emissions on diesel.  My parents still have theirs. I started driving GM trucks again in 2001. The cylinder deactivation drove me away. I honestly don’t know what I would buy if I needed a new one. There’s only one real V-8 left. Never drove a Nissan. I’m not afraid of new things. My first car was an RX3.

Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted
On 4/29/2020 at 12:39 PM, Orlick82 said:

 Is it true you have to change the internals of the motor if you’re going to delete DFM? 

 

 

No. Chip shortage anyone? 

 

On 4/30/2020 at 7:15 PM, 175vTrailbossLT said:

 

There’s a plate with solenoids that are pressurized off of oil pressure. If the solenoids fail or there’s an issue with oil pressure, well there you go- a good way to burn off a cylinder or head..block..whatever. 

 

 is this controlled by software or is a physical mod required that voids warranty?

 

 

Software solution. Chip shortage anyone? 

 

On 5/1/2020 at 11:43 AM, Thomcat said:

So I'd like to know what the effects would be of keeping the oil control solenoids idle or maybe worse open under constant voltage for an extended period....heat buildup?, varnish deposits inside tappets?....and what happens to collapsible lifters that remain in the one position for very long periods when the device is removed for inspection or service and they expand/collapse and jamb with accumulated varnish buildup in a static area?

 

Varnish is not a cycling of components issue. It's an oil MAINTENANCE issue. Maintain the oil in accordance with the oils abilities and there will never be any varnish and darn little wear. As far a a lifter not cycling for long periods of time...Humm....ever break a coat hanger by bending it back and forth past it's elastic limit? What happens if you don't bend it?

 

When the system is idle the solenoids are not under power. They will not overheat. They are inactive. 

 

Chip shortage anyone? 

 

Material science is not Voodoo.  Accelerated studies are valid. Doesn't matter if the paint wears through by mother washing the walls over 20 years or a machine does the rubs of 20 years worth of cleaning in 10 minutes. One rub is one rub. Ditto cycle testing solenoids, valves, connecting rods. It's how GM developed the SBC rods in the early 50's for infinite life cycles. (Peterson Publications, Hot to Hotrod the SBC) Even today on those that are operated inside the test loads NEVER fail. Only the abused do.... D'ho...you mean it wasn't designed to be spun 10,000 rpm with 20 pounds of boost? :idiot:

 

 

shakenfake Senior Enthusiast

shakenfake

Posted
Posted

You do have to change the internals of the engine to delete it. It's only the camshaft and lifters though. That was on the AFM though. AFM would fail because of hardware issues. A lot of people would have AFM failure even though it was deleted since day one or shortly thereafter. 

 

This new DFM system I am not sure I have heard of anyone with a failure that doesn't have the chip in it. Could it be that they figured out how to keep the hardware from failing and now just have software failures? Hmmmm

milkmaster Enthusiast

milkmaster

Posted
Posted

This discussion makes me feel good about buying a 2021 Sierra SLT chip shortage truck.  No DFM or at least it is deactivated.  Some have mentioned the parts are still there, but that's ok.  I still am happy with it so far.  The truck was built in June at the Mexico plant according to the sticker.  It's got a little over 2k miles on it since July with no complaints about anything.  I hope it stays that way.

  • Like 1
Transient Senior Enthusiast

Transient

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, milkmaster said:

This discussion makes me feel good about buying a 2021 Sierra SLT chip shortage truck.  No DFM or at least it is deactivated.  Some have mentioned the parts are still there, but that's ok.  I still am happy with it so far.  The truck was built in June at the Mexico plant according to the sticker.  It's got a little over 2k miles on it since July with no complaints about anything.  I hope it stays that way.

Your truck may have been built in Mexico, but the engine was likely built in New York. 

Transient Senior Enthusiast

Transient

Posted
Posted (edited)
20 hours ago, KARNUT said:

They wouldn’t, once burned. My whole family was GM in the 60s and 70s. The 5.7 diesel drove some away. The 6.5 in trucks drove the rest. We drove 7.3 and 5.9s after. The we went back to gas after the emissions on diesel.  My parents still have theirs. I started driving GM trucks again in 2001. The cylinder deactivation drove me away. I honestly don’t know what I would buy if I needed a new one. There’s only one real V-8 left. Never drove a Nissan. I’m not afraid of new things. My first car was an RX3.

People always find failures they justify as a means for them to give up.  Nobody ever finds praise to remain loyal.  Seems like society focuses on the glass being half empty the majority of the time. 

 

As for Nissan's, I've found the slightest touch of the gas peddle moves the vehicle suddenly and quickly.  I think it's a little too aggressive.  That's just my opinion, though.

 

Btw, given the topic of the thread, I read an article Google suggested that was about oil consumption.  Abridged version:  Don't own a vehicle from MY2010-2012.  Seems like everybody has the issue.  Acura, Audi, Honda, Volkswagen, etc all suffered from oil consumption.  If they can find a way to fix the problem, so can GM.  In another article I read, GM is focused on reducing Green House Gas emissions.  Their goal next year is greater than 10% reduction.  They already achieved over 5%.  Killing off the 4.3 V6 and the 5.3 AFM is believed will help achieve this goal.  They indicated such in the Q3 2021 investors call. 

Edited by Transient
KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Transient said:

People always find failures they justify as a means for them to give up.  Nobody ever finds praise to remain loyal.  Seems like society focuses on the glass being half empty the majority of the time. 

 

As for Nissan's, I've found the slightest touch of the gas peddle moves the vehicle suddenly and quickly.  I think it's a little too aggressive.  That's just my opinion, though.

 

Btw, given the topic of the thread, I read an article Google suggested that was about oil consumption.  Abridged version:  Don't own a vehicle from MY2010-2012.  Seems like everybody has the issue.  Acura, Audi, Honda, Volkswagen, etc all suffered from oil consumption.  If they can find a way to fix the problem, so can GM.  In another article I read, GM is focused on reducing Green House Gas emissions.  Their goal next year is greater than 10% reduction.  They already achieved over 5%.  Killing off the 4.3 V6 and the 5.3 AFM is believed will help achieve this goal.  They indicated such in the Q3 2021 investors call. 

The first failure was the 5.7 diesel as stated. If it was one no problem things happen. It was 4 out of 4. GM at the time was gee we haven’t heard of that. The 6.5 was a little better. The first one lost an injection pump under warranty. The dealer this time said we’re seeing failures around 80K miles. We had 3. I had  91 Ram diesel at the time. It was a beast. We stayed with those with the exception of my moms 2000 7.3. She still drives it. My father 98 Rams still around. I’m the only one that went to GM. I had a 01, 04. 06, then I strayed for awhile. Bought my 14 for retirement. Saw the cylinder deactivation. Joined this forum read up on cylinder deactivation. And passed. My 14 was the quietest, quickest, hands down best truck I ever owned. Love it, except for that Frankenstein engine. Not about an half full cup. I was about to put serious mods on the engine and replace my blown 92 Chevy. I sold the 14 keep the 92 another 5 trouble free years. Fool me once…….

fastk9dad Enthusiast

fastk9dad

Posted
Posted

Just as a counterpoint to some of the concerns in this discussion...

 

I had a '09 Tahoe 5.3 w/AFM. Traded in at 219k. Mobil1 & AC Delco filters through out its life & only switched to high mileage M1 once over 200k. Oil changes were generally done when OLI was around 20%, except for last year where it sat more than it moved and I changed it after 1 year. No AFM issues and TBH I didn't even know there were potential for issues until I had about 210k on it. I eventually got a Range device for it as a precaution but it saw less than 3k/9 months of use before I traded the Tahoe in, now it's just a paperweight on my desk.

 

DFM doesn't bother or scare me, I barely even notice it unless I'm looking for it. Although I do like hypermiling when taking long highway trips, or at least try to.

Greyhound6.2 Enthusiast

Greyhound6.2

Posted
Posted

I saw a comment recently about putting the trans in L and limiting the gears to L9 to disable the DFM, I have been doing that for a couple weeks now I have no way of knowing if it actually disables the DFM but it does idle smoother being in L9. in normal D (auto stop disabled) when I come to a stop light the engine almost hesitates a bit and goes to slightly "rough idle" It has not done this since I started playing in L9

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,894
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    TopBo
    Newest Member
    TopBo
    Joined

  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,126 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • davester
      New to Me 2010 SLE (Quirks, Issues)

      By davester · Posted

      not all plugs will be used.  gm uses more generic harnesses that support most/all options, and if your truck doesn't have a specfiic option, the plug won't be used (commonly will have a dummy insert in the plug , or it'll be taped up, but some may just be left as is).  But it's sldo possible some p.o. has installed the wrong/cheaper parts that aren't correct for your vehicle...
    • fm2176
      New to Me 2010 SLE (Quirks, Issues)

      By fm2176 · Posted

      First off, I'm not trying to just get easy advice/fixes for the issues I've noticed so far.  I'll be combing through the site via searches and such, and if past experiences are any indication, should find what I need.  For the sake of conversation, though, I figured I'd post the handful of things I've noticed in the 12 hours since buying my 2010 SLE CCSB.     Indicator lights: Airbag and TPMS.  The tire pressures aren't reading for any of the wheels, so I'm pretty certain the sensors were either removed, are damaged, or are otherwise inoperable.  I used to mount and balance tires 25 years ago but am pretty much ignorant when it comes to TPMS.  My 2006 didn't have the sensors and this might be the fourth vehicle I've owned that does.     Radio: Rear speakers aren't working.  I removed the driver's side rear door panel and checked the speaker and wiring.  I also removed the sill and b-pillar covers to check the wiring.  A few minutes of Google Fu showed that this is potentially a head unit issue.    Switches: Power mirrors don't turn left/right.  I ordered replacement driver's door switches that should arrive tomorrow.  The windows and locks work but it was only about $20 for all of them.  The driver's side rear window switch lets the window down but won't put it back up.  I think the passenger rear doesn't work at all.  In the coming days/weeks, I'll break out my multimeter to check all of that.   Unknown wiring harness: There's a box attached to the front driver's side of the engine compartment, right where the second battery shelf is located.  There are three plugs, one of which looks like it fits a standard headlight-style bulb (9007 or similar).  It doesn't look like it's plugged into anything.  I'll do some digging and if I don't see anything elsewhere on the site, post some pictures here.   Unknown plugs on brake booster: There are at least two female plugs on the brake booster that aren't being used.  I think it might be a replacement/aftermarket, so maybe those are used for a different application, as there don't seem to be any unplugged harnesses and no indicator lights are on.   Little squeaks when turning: Sounds almost like a bushing around the bed of the truck.  I'll have to pay close attention as I get more familiar with the truck.   Clunk on acceleration: possibly the infamous drivetrain clunk.  My 2006 had it and I'm just not familiar enough with this truck yet to fully grasp what it is.   Anyway, my apologies for the vague and all over the place post.  This truck is new to me, and it's been four years since I drove my 2006.  With 200k miles, I know I'll need to learn this truck quickly to avoid having any major issues, despite being confident it's got much more life to it.  My 2006 had nearly 320k on it when I parked it (nearly 300k of which I put on the truck), and it was still drivable then, though I suspected the head gasket might have blown.  I'd hoped to have that truck back by now, but it's gone forever, as I detailed in my reintroduction thread.  
    • lowrider
      Range RA007 DFM Module

      By lowrider · Posted

      I always drive in Sport mode. With more driving, I am finding the initial response when accelerating is much quicker now🖕 Lou
    • Tyler Gibbs
      2022 2500HD with a new RSI SmartCap

      By Tyler Gibbs · Posted

      Is it an optical illusion in the pic or is the truck really squatting that much horribly?
    • fm2176
      It's Been a Long Time...

      By fm2176 · Posted

      My initial introduction was here.  It's hard to believe that I last posted in February 2013, having just deployed to Kyrgyzstan.  Since then, I've retired from the military and the 2006 Sierra SLT Z71 that first brought me to these pages was lost.  I went forward to Afghanistan in March 2013 and did a lot of sitting behind a computer on brigade staff.  Within 18 months of getting back to the States, I was selected for Drill Sergeant duty, after which I moved back to Virginia (my home state and where I served from 2004-2008).  That '06 Sierra did a lot of driving between Louisiana, Georgia, and Virginia, and ended up with nearly 320k miles by 2022.  By then, the registration had been expired for a couple of years, but the pandemic had all but eliminated tickets for such transgressions.  Admittedly too, I usually drove my wife's SUV or son's car the 2-3 times a week I had to report to work.  Teleworking sure was fun while it lasted.   I started my retirement leave four years ago and stored the Sierra at my sister's house.  A big mess was made when her fiancé passed while she was taking care of business out-of-state in late-2024, and his son pretty much mismanaged everything to do with the estate.  Even so, I was assured that my truck was safe... until it wasn't.  I found out that my truck had been scrapped about four months after the son took over everything.  There's nothing I could do; I'm 1000 miles away and it was technically abandoned property since he'd even trespassed my sister from her own house (she had no claim to it as she wasn't married, and the fiancé was the sole owner).     Anyway, today I got my second Sierra.  This is a 2010 SLE 2WB CCSB with a little over 200k miles on it.  It's got the 5.3L I'm familiar with and should handle what I need it for.  Hauling stuff that won't fit in the Transit Connect (yep, I sold out, but that's the wife's vehicle) and towing a few times a year tops.  The price seemed decent, considering how much people sell their trucks for in the Deep South: $4500.  I've seen similar trucks listed for more than double that.  I got it from a coworker who left his tag on until we transfer the title next week (Louisiana requires a notary for transfers), so I've been driving it all day.  The rear speakers don't work, which is one of the things that brought me back to these forums earlier.  I can't say how active I'll be as a poster, but I'll be scouring the archives while I find out every little thing I can about the 2010s and particular nuances/problems with my truck.   It's definitely not a GMC, but I got another Willys Jeep a few months back as well, so I'm almost at the same place I was when I first joined gm-trucks.com.  My old 1960 DJ3A was sold back around 2010 or 2011; my current Jeep is a 1946 CJ2A.  So, I've got a slightly newer GMC and a much older Jeep.  I kind of wish I still had that F-250 I had way back when too.  The Dakota is long gone and was technically my brother's truck, though I had it registered and insured.  The F-250 had to go when my grandmother's house was foreclosed on due to mismanagement around 2012 or so.     Hopefully anyone that made it this far isn't too annoyed.  I tend to be long-winded, but I'll be doing more reading than posting in the coming months.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...