Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It’s been real, folks. Sold my 2018 Silverado Monday...saying goodbye to this great community. 
 

Managed to put 53,000 miles on the truck in two years. Loved that truck! Was a little concerned about a few things that started popping up (mostly the shutter/misfire I was getting on the highway while going up hills). Other than that, great ride.

 

Going to miss this place. Really enjoyed Grumpy Bear’s build thread, among other things.

 

Happy trails.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted


What are you buying / driving now?
Posted
48 minutes ago, 2018GMC said:


What are you buying / driving now?

Honestly, I haven’t bought anything yet, been using my wife’s Mercedes ML350 for the past four days (that won’t last much longer). I might buy a used Tundra or leave the truck world all together and buy a Lexus GS350. I owned a Lexus LS460 before the Silverado. 

Posted

Good luck with your new purchase.

 

You will always be part of the GM family, plus it is free to be on the forum....

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Doublebase said:

It’s been real, folks. Sold my 2018 Silverado Monday...saying goodbye to this great community. 
 

Managed to put 53,000 miles on the truck in two years. Loved that truck! Was a little concerned about a few things that started popping up (mostly the shutter/misfire I was getting on the highway while going up hills). Other than that, great ride.

 

Going to miss this place. Really enjoyed Grumpy Bear’s build thread, among other things.

 

Happy trails.

You will be missed. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Been looking at Tundras closely myself. Bought the wife a Highlander and theres something to this whole buy it and drive it with no issues stuff. It kills me to leave GM too but they have not been the same since bankruptcy. Good luck to you, keep checking back to see if we ever figure out the shake haha. 

  • Like 2
Posted

If I was going to buy a tundra, it’d be like an ‘07-‘09 with like 100k miles.

 

My dad sold his perfect condition ‘09 base tundra for like $12k and got an ‘19 trd tundra for like $40k

 

It is absolutely hysterical how similar the two trucks feel driving. It’s like the same damn thing. The ‘19 just has some tacked on flash.

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Doublebase said:

Honestly, I haven’t bought anything yet, been using my wife’s Mercedes ML350 for the past four days (that won’t last much longer). I might buy a used Tundra or leave the truck world all together and buy a Lexus GS350. I owned a Lexus LS460 before the Silverado. 

I almost pulled the trigger on a gs350, but then I drove the model 3 performance.

 

if you want an awesome sedan that costs very little to own. Get the stealth model 3 performance. You get the long range awd and then you can pay a couple grand for the software update to get the same power as the performance model ( LR awd has same drivetrain as perf)

 

Will make the lexus gs350 feel like it’s 15 years old.

Edited by truckguy82
Posted
Been looking at Tundras closely myself. Bought the wife a Highlander and theres something to this whole buy it and drive it with no issues stuff. It kills me to leave GM too but they have not been the same since bankruptcy. Good luck to you, keep checking back to see if we ever figure out the shake haha. 
Im curious why you think GM is so bad?

I have a 2020 GMC Denali HD Duramax and absolutely love it, Last GM i owned was a 2006 GMC sierra.

Been in Fords and Toyota in between and right now i wouldnt even consider either again

2013 Tundra, 2011, 2014 F150's and 2018 F250 Powerchoke

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Posted
51 minutes ago, truckguy82 said:

I almost pulled the trigger on a gs350, but then I drove the model 3 performance.

 

if you want an awesome sedan that costs very little to own. Get the stealth model 3 performance. You get the long range awd and then you can pay a couple grand for the software update to get the same power as the performance model ( LR awd has same drivetrain as perf)

 

Will make the lexus gs350 feel like it’s 15 years old.

Good to know, but I’m actually going to “downsize” and when I say that, I mean in price. I can get a GS for around $14,000 used right now with 100,000 miles, 2013-2014. I trust the brand enough where I don’t worry about the mileage being too high at that point. Drive one yesterday...114,000 miles. I swear to god it felt like a brand new car. So tight, so quiet, so responsive. Interior was mint without a single sign of wear.
 

But I bet the Tesla is awesome. You can’t beat that electric motor power and torque. 

Posted
45 minutes ago, FLTRXS said:

Im curious why you think GM is so bad?

I have a 2020 GMC Denali HD Duramax and absolutely love it, Last GM i owned was a 2006 GMC sierra.

Been in Fords and Toyota in between and right now i wouldnt even consider either again

2013 Tundra, 2011, 2014 F150's and 2018 F250 Powerchoke

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
 

What was your issues with the Tundra? I haven’t seen or heard anything bad about them except for the rusted frame that they fix. Have a friend that owns a shop, says he sees these things coming in with 300,000 miles...just change the oil, tires and brakes, that’s about it. 
 

I do like the Silverado though. I’ll never get that type of fuel economy out of a full sized V8 truck again. Hell, I won’t get that fuel economy out of 90% of the cars and SUV’s I’m looking at. I averaged 24 mpg over the LIFE of my truck. Not on a single trip, but the entire time I owned it! 53,000 miles of driving. Let’s say I needed to do lifters and a torque converter at 120,000 miles?? The cost of those repairs still wouldn’t exceed the money I saved on fuel compared to other trucks.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, FLTRXS said:

Im curious why you think GM is so bad?

I have a 2020 GMC Denali HD Duramax and absolutely love it, Last GM i owned was a 2006 GMC sierra.

Been in Fords and Toyota in between and right now i wouldnt even consider either again

2013 Tundra, 2011, 2014 F150's and 2018 F250 Powerchoke

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
 

A tundra is more reliable, thats a fact.

 

When you buy a tundra, you a buying a 15 year old platform with a 15 year old drivetrain. It’s easy to be reliable when you do that.

 

There is no question every other brand makes a better performing truck for the money in nearly every measurable aspect. To me, reliability is important, but it’s just a metric that I need to weigh. Some people put more weight on reliability than me, and the tundra is the best choice for them.

Edited by truckguy82
  • Like 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, Doublebase said:

Good to know, but I’m actually going to “downsize” and when I say that, I mean in price. I can get a GS for around $14,000 used right now with 100,000 miles, 2013-2014. I trust the brand enough where I don’t worry about the mileage being too high at that point. Drive one yesterday...114,000 miles. I swear to god it felt like a brand new car. So tight, so quiet, so responsive. Interior was mint without a single sign of wear.
 

But I bet the Tesla is awesome. You can’t beat that electric motor power and torque. 

 

I was looking at those years gs as well.

 

also check out the m37 at a similar price. Not the m56 and not the q70.

 

rented an m37 and I freaking loved it. Also rented a q70 which is nearly the same car but with electric steering and I didn’t like it at all.

 

If you get a gs, look for the radar cruise button on the steering wheel, and the mark levinson sound system.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, FLTRXS said:

Im curious why you think GM is so bad?

I have a 2020 GMC Denali HD Duramax and absolutely love it, Last GM i owned was a 2006 GMC sierra.

Been in Fords and Toyota in between and right now i wouldnt even consider either again

2013 Tundra, 2011, 2014 F150's and 2018 F250 Powerchoke

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
 

I loved my 07 Avalanche and many GM’s before that but after tons of shaking, clunking and other issues on my 14 they bought it back and now I have a 17 Denali thats had the TQ convertor flushed 3 times and still shakes along with homemade rubber and zip ties around my leafs so it doesn't clunk every time I turn, horrible clunk and jerk 1-2 shift and already had both LCA’s replaced, all this before 36,000 miles. Brother in law has a 16 that he bought new and its already had lifters collapse 3 times. Im not bashing GM by any means, I love their stuff but the reliability is just gone, you will probably have alot of luck with the HD line, I dont know anything about them.

Posted

My 14 GMC would have been my truck to keep if it wasn’t for cylinder deactivation. It was quiet road well, good fuel mileage with the cylinder deactivation turned off. The replacement cost for consumables would have been reasonable. Trucks now with 8-10 speed transmissions, start stop and other high cost useless electronics would make out of warranty repairs very expensive. I always believe the 6 speed transmission was the perfect sweat spot for these trucks. Reasonable to rebuild. As long as I can find a clean pre 2013 GM that’s where I’ll stay.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...