Jump to content

Pics of AT 4s with Black OEM wheels

tdowell65
 Share

Recommended Posts

tdowell65 Enthusiast

tdowell65

Posted
Posted

I have the 18" AT4 wheels on my 20 AT4 in Smokey quartz metallic and think the truck will look good with a black wheel.  Might level or lift later but for now leaving it as is suspension wise.  I've seen some 20" take offs that have been painted black that I think would look good on truck for now, but was hoping to get some pictures of similar setups.   I've seen some 22" on here and they look great as well just wanting to stay with 20 for a little more sidewall.   

 

Thanks

 

  • Like 1
FredJ Enthusiast

FredJ

Posted
Posted

I agree. I think some colours of AT4s would look great with the 20" black wheel that's standard on Elevation trim. The wheel seems identical except for colour to the 20" AT4 wheels. 

I ended up with a pacific blue at4 with 18" rims and loving it. Black wheels would look awesome though. 

 

tdowell65 Enthusiast

tdowell65

Posted
  • Author
Posted

 I found a take off place that gave me decent trade on my 18" for these 20".  I like the looks lot better than I thought and no road noise now.  I did like the looks of the Duratracs though.  Thinking about putting the red caliper covers on to give it just little bit of pop.  

9C6BA1CB-2AC5-40A7-AFC2-4591AB2A8621_1_201_a.jpeg

Grover67 Enthusiast

Grover67

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, tdowell65 said:

 I found a take off place that gave me decent trade on my 18" for these 20".  I like the looks lot better than I thought and no road noise now.  I did like the looks of the Duratracs though.  Thinking about putting the red caliper covers on to give it just little bit of pop.  

9C6BA1CB-2AC5-40A7-AFC2-4591AB2A8621_1_201_a.jpeg

 

14 hours ago, tdowell65 said:

 I found a take off place that gave me decent trade on my 18" for these 20".  I like the looks lot better than I thought and no road noise now.  I did like the looks of the Duratracs though.  Thinking about putting the red caliper covers on to give it just little bit of pop.  

9C6BA1CB-2AC5-40A7-AFC2-4591AB2A8621_1_201_a.jpeg

Really like that! Looking to do the same to mine, I've got the Dark Sky '20 version.
Did you do any other blacking out, looks like AT4 badges, besides what I can see?

tdowell65 Enthusiast

tdowell65

Posted
  • Author
Posted
10 hours ago, Grover67 said:

 

Really like that! Looking to do the same to mine, I've got the Dark Sky '20 version.
Did you do any other blacking out, looks like AT4 badges, besides what I can see?

Pretty much all I done to it so far.  Replaced the AT4 badges, tinted windows 3M on front, replaced the muffler and changed the 18"to 20" Elevation wheels.  I did order the red brake calipers.  I hate the running boards on it wouldn't mind replacing it with some amp boards.  Not planning on doing a whole lot more to it because it never stops LOL 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • richard wysong
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By richard wysong · Posted

      I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • James Beyer
      Trading 7.3 (Godzilla) for G.M.C gas

      By James Beyer · Posted

      Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • asilverblazer
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • Coastie05
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...