Jump to content

Best bedliner?


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a Rhino Liner or something I think, it was right around $500 to get it done.

 

Line-X was over $700 where I live.

Posted
26 minutes ago, lapoolboy said:

I second the LineX recommendation.

The Linex is worth every penny......Around here in the Boston area the linex starts at 500 and goes up a next level to 625 if I remember correctly...The only difference in the 2 the guy told me was one sun fades a little quicker on the 500$ one...I have a tonneau cover,and my truck is garaged so I really don’t need to worry about it fading...

Posted

i recommend the bed Carpet, its easy to install and remove and the bed will have the oem paint finish when you sell it.  $200, partial kit, and $400 for full bed kit

Posted

My previous truck had a spray in bed liner, but everything would slide around back there, this time I went with a simple $100 Rough Country rubber bed mat.  I like it, things don't slide around anymore, but it doesn't protect the sides of the bed.

Posted

I have no experience with Rhino Liner but this is my 2nd truck with LineX.  Had to cut a hole for the B&W 5th Wheel/Gooseneck adapter.  Used a cricular saw to cut it, you can ser how thick is Line X.

 

The red part is the bed thickness, the blue part is the LineX, is about 1/8 in thick.

 

 

20200813_115817.jpg

Posted

I had line x premium in my Colorado witch was cheaper to get done. My Silverado standard bed double cab line x wanted $800 bucks to do it so I went with rhino it was around $500 to do and tbh they both seem about the same the line x seems harder the rhino seems a little more soft/grippy. Either way I’m happy with it it’s under a tonneau cover so fading wont be an issue. Don’t really haul anything either. 

Posted
4 hours ago, greco2003 said:

I had line x premium in my Colorado witch was cheaper to get done. My Silverado standard bed double cab line x wanted $800 bucks to do it so I went with rhino it was around $500 to do and tbh they both seem about the same the line x seems harder the rhino seems a little more soft/grippy. Either way I’m happy with it it’s under a tonneau cover so fading wont be an issue. Don’t really haul anything either. 

Out of curiosity, why did you get the bed liner if you don’t haul stuff?  What made you spend $500 on spray in vs $100 on a bed mat?

Posted
5 minutes ago, pewterliftedz said:

Out of curiosity, why did you get the bed liner if you don’t haul stuff?  What made you spend $500 on spray in vs $100 on a bed mat?

I do Occasionally haul stuff in the bed my truck was a dealer demo and had some scratches already in the box. And personally I think a spray in Liner looks a lot cleaner and the bed rugs that cover the whole bed are expensive as well and I just don’t like the look of them. 

Posted

I think, this time, will skip the Tonneau Cover.  Since the truck main purpose is to haul our 5th Wheel Camper, intalling and removing the 5th Wheel Hitch is easier to deal with.  Beside, when brand new, after the liner was on, I hauled 3 oak trees to the dump site, 5 trips.  I am using the truck like a truck.  Maybe in the future, might get a Tonneau Cover, who knows.

Posted

I wish that I could remember the brand of spray in that the dealer had installed in my 2005 Silverado.  It was the typically hard liner.  It almost had a soft feel to it, and was super grippy unless it was wet.  I once drove 45 minutes to work with the tailgate down and a case of oil sitting on it and it didn't move.  I got to work and I was like WTF, no wonder people were giving me a lot of distance today.  :  )

Posted

rhino liners is much softer than lineX, i preffer the softer feel , but the linex if very grippy and abraision resistant.  I still would do a full bed carpet with walls and tailgate,  makes crawling in the bed to grab stuff easy on the knees, warmer feel  bed camping, noise isolation is great cause its 1" foam under it, dogs love it,  what else can i rave about. if hauling dirt lumber i would get OEM plastic liner instead of spray liners. they go used on craigslist for  $50

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 519 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...