Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Not really, you just drop it off and rag on their courtesy vehicle while you wait. But it don’t really matter to me, mine hasn’t been in over a year, and I’ve never been stranded. These trucks ain’t so bad after all.
 

Bottom line is whether you buy new or restore old, someone is always going to spend time and money to work on it. 

  • Like 2
Posted
6 hours ago, Dnt said:

Trying to remember where I heard this GREAT phrase spoken at a recent political rally.   

Quote: "WE Choose Truth over Facts" I will have to google that I guess......   

 

On a brighter note, 

Dodge has upped the competition on excess power and capabilities. Please be very careful with this info, if you expose a New Green Deal supporter, they may experience heart palpitations.       

Check it out   https://www.ramtrucks.com/trx.html   

        

Let me know when they put that motor in a RCSB will ya. ? 

Posted

GM needs to come out with a full-size ZR2 supercharged. But also offer a sport model that is supercharged.  Like there 03-06 S.S. trucks. I loved the looks and stance of those trucks. I’m not into lifted trucks. Keep it low to the ground and haul 5 people.  I’d buy it instantly. 

Posted
And I've never replaced a power window regulator/motor.  

Lucky dude. 3 of them (2 drivers door) on a CCSB 1500, 2 on a 2500HD ECLB(each door), and 2 so far on a '14 3500HD (driver door & back passenger). Regulators/actuators on GM trucks are ******... among numerous other things... yet I keep driving them for some reason, lol!

 

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, TNTSilverado said:

GM needs to come out with a full-size ZR2 supercharged. But also offer a sport model that is supercharged.  Like there 03-06 S.S. trucks. I loved the looks and stance of those trucks. I’m not into lifted trucks. Keep it low to the ground and haul 5 people.  I’d buy it instantly. 

The Silverado ZRX is coming, supposedly going to be supercharged. Like you, I would rather have a sport truck version though.


Funny that the TRX, even with 700hp, is slower to 60 than the 30 year old GMC Syclone someone posted in this thread awhile back. The off road stuff I don’t need...just eats power. 

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, OnTheReel said:

The Silverado ZRX is coming, supposedly going to be supercharged. Like you, I would rather have a sport truck version though.


Funny that the TRX, even with 700hp, is slower to 60 than the 30 year old GMC Syclone someone posted in this thread awhile back. The off road stuff I don’t need...just eats power. 

Totally agree. Lifting the truck kills its performance.  Give me the S.S.  version on 22s with a supercharger crew cab and So can fit the family and dog and I’m set. 
ya the old syclones could rip in the early 90s. They were so fast they took down a Ferrari in a car and driver comparisons.  Thing that stunk about them is they could haul more than 500 lbs. 

 

But if you had one now a days they are worth a pretty penny   

Edited by TNTSilverado
Posted
GM needs to come out with a full-size ZR2 supercharged. But also offer a sport model that is supercharged.  Like there 03-06 S.S. trucks. I loved the looks and stance of those trucks. I’m not into lifted trucks. Keep it low to the ground and haul 5 people.  I’d buy it instantly. 

Sounds like a full sized car. It would be cheaper and get better fuel mileage. Stinger comes to mind, among others. The money you save you could buy a used truck. I did just that, only with a Genesis and Avalanche.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
1 minute ago, KARNUT said:


Sounds like a full sized car. It would be cheaper and get better fuel mileage. Stinger comes to mind, among others. The money you save you could buy a used truck. I did just that, only with a Genesis and Avalanche.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Full-size car can’t pull my boat to my lake house! Plus there is something about a truck that hauls @$$ like a sports car that entices me. 

  • Like 1
Posted
Full-size car can’t pull my boat to my lake house! Plus there is something about a truck that hauls @$$ like a sports car that entices me. 

That’s why you buy a used truck. Best of both worlds. It took me 40 years to figure it out. Sport sedan and a used truck. Spots sedan 0-60 low 5s, 27 MPG @ 78 MPH. The hot rod truck is going to cost high 50K or more. Stinger is about 20K less. That’s a pretty nice used truck.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
1 minute ago, KARNUT said:


That’s why you buy a used truck. Best of both worlds. It took me 40 years to figure it out. Spots sedan and a used truck. Spots sedan 0-60 low 5s, 27 MPG @ 78 MPH. The hot rod truck is going to cost high 50K or more. Stinger is about 20K less. That’s a pretty nice used truck.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Why have 2 to do the job of one. Then you have twice the gas to pay and twice the insurance. Doesn’t make any sense. I’ll stick with one TRUCK that hauls @$$.  Especially when you pass that Stinger and they look at you like holy $h!t!!  

Posted
Why have 2 to do the job of one. Then you have twice the gas to pay and twice the insurance. Doesn’t make any sense. I’ll stick with one TRUCK that hauls @$$.  Especially when you pass that Stinger and they look at you like holy $h!t!!  

That wouldn’t happen. I can only drive one a a time. I’m just trying to be rational. But hey it took me 40 years. I spent a fortune building hot rod trucks. Only to have my wife’s sports sedan keep up and get great gas mileage doing it. If I wasn’t retired I’d probably already have the hot Ram ordered.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, KARNUT said:


That wouldn’t happen. I can only drive one a a time. I’m just trying to be rational. But hey it took me 40 years. I spent a fortune building hot rod trucks. Only to have my wife’s sports sedan keep up and get great gas mileage doing it. If I wasn’t retired I’d probably already have the hot Ram ordered.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You still have to put gas in 2 vehicles whenever you choose to drive either one and you still have to insure both vehicles.  If GM comes out with this truck. You aren’t having to “build” it like your talking. It’s already a hot rod!  
 

you could always be a greater at Walmart or a used car salesman. Take that money and use it for the new Ram. Just because your retired doesn’t mean you can’t do something different that is less stressful. Keeps you young and active. 
 

I detail and give plasma on the side of my regular job. All the money I make goes to mods on my truck. I have never dipped into my savings or regular checking account in modding my vehicles. 

Posted (edited)

You also have to take into effect a used truck has no warranty so on top of insurance you have basic maintenance and if something goes wrong with it you have another expense. 
I've down this with my 2018. I never drove it because I had a 1997 C/k 1500. It was a great truck but it nickled and dimed me to death. Not worth it. Been there done that. 

Edited by TNTSilverado
Posted

If I lived in the south I think the two vehicle approach would be a lot more attractive. No snow, no salt. Easier to daily drive a car down there year round, and easier to find an older truck that’s still in nice condition.
 

Around here, ALL GMT-800s, and most GMT-900s are well on their way to being total rot boxes...I would not want to mess with it. And anything newer than a GMT-900 is a stone’s throw away in price from new.

 

Just simpler for me to get an all in one solution. A new truck that’s somewhat entertaining to drive. 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, TNTSilverado said:

GM needs to come out with a full-size ZR2 supercharged. But also offer a sport model that is supercharged.  Like there 03-06 S.S. trucks. I loved the looks and stance of those trucks. I’m not into lifted trucks. Keep it low to the ground and haul 5 people.  I’d buy it instantly. 

GM needs to make simple reliable drivelines like back in the 90's . less tech, and social media crap,  I miss velour seats !  new veihles are over HP, and under Torqued.  it's a constant chainsaw  race on the local streets

Edited by flyingfool

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...