Jump to content

19-20 hard folding tonneau cover?

icemanRC

By icemanRC
in Modifications, Wheels & Tires

 Share

Recommended Posts

icemanRC Enthusiast

icemanRC

Posted
Posted

I’m looking to buy a hard folding tonneau cover for my 2020 Sierra SLT crew. I’m looking at the rough country and a few others. Has anyone had any experience with the Rough Country or any of the other brands that you would recommend?

JAEDEE Enthusiast

JAEDEE

Posted
Posted

I have the Bakflip F1 on my mine and have zero complaints about it.  Easy to install, locks with the tailgate and water stays out.

Julio13 Enthusiast

Julio13

Posted
Posted

I recommend peragon great experience with it also great customer service


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Klayton Tripp New Member

Klayton Tripp

Posted
Posted
On 9/2/2020 at 9:27 PM, Paul 2020RST said:

Following.  I currently have the rough country one in my cart.  Hoping to hear someone chime in on it.

I've got the Rough Country low profile on mine. Completely happy with it, haven't had any leaks, build quality is solid, and the tailgate still drops with the fob. For the price, imho, it can't be beat!

Resqu2 Enthusiast

Resqu2

Posted
Posted

I’m going to go back with another Undercover UltraFlex. It’s worked great on my last to Chevy’s 

BravesZ71 Enthusiast

BravesZ71

Posted
Posted

Not a hard folding, but I have a Rough Country soft tri fold. The cover is great and quality is really good. I would think the hard cover from rough country would be good as well. 

Bazel New Member

Bazel

Posted
Posted

I purchased one to use while I was waiting for my Leer camper shell to arrive.

 

The shell ended up arriving in two weeks (they told me it would be 4-6 weeks), so the cover was only on my truck for about ten days.
 

I’ll sell it for $600, if you are interested.

 

Thank you,

Bazel

 

 

41D4540B-A504-4826-9A67-51A970F866C0.jpeg

Ed/2020RST Enthusiast

Ed/2020RST

Posted
Posted

I just got a Undercover Ultra-Flex and love it. It was #2 in a Review I found of several hard folding covers. I chose it over the #1 because the review stated it was more waterproof than #1.----However, it comes with vehicles specific instructions that are for "GM" vehicles which states to add the spacers on the side of the bedrail before installing the cover rails---This DOES NOT work for at least the new body style. With them installed, as you tighten down the rail clamps the rails themselves will tilt inward. I took them off and they mounted up just fine???

Brian Jones Enthusiast

Brian Jones

Posted
Posted

I picked up the Rough Country Tri-Fold. I didn't care about it being low profile or not. I am very happy with it. With a few minor adjustments I was able to see almost zero water in the bed.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Aimatdeer
      Ac not keeping up

      By Aimatdeer · Posted

      Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • CamGTP
      Gas Prices

      By CamGTP · Posted

      Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Atlas
      Gas Prices

      By Atlas · Posted

      Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • scotthvac.net
      2022-24 halogen - led grille swap

      By scotthvac.net · Posted

      2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...