Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My brother just bought a 2021 and it has wireless android auto. I have a 2019 that doesn't. Does anybody know if you are able to upgrade the 2019 to have it? I tried searching but the search function in the app is terrible.

 

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

 

 

Posted

Only other difference is his doesn't have wireless charging. Mine does with the same packages. Both SLT's with premium package.

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Posted
Only other difference is his doesn't have wireless charging. Mine does with the same packages. Both SLT's with premium package.

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk


Lol, that seems odd. You have wireless charging and don't need it. He has wireless android auto but no wireless charging. Dumb.

Sent from my SM-N981U using Tapatalk

Posted
Lol, that seems odd. You have wireless charging and don't need it. He has wireless android auto but no wireless charging. Dumb.

Sent from my SM-N981U using Tapatalk

You have to get the premium plus package to get wireless charging now apparently.

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Posted

For 2021:

 

On Sierra

NEW!  Wireless Phone Projection, for Apple CarPlay and Android Auto
On SLE and Elevation  -  Included and only available with (PDQ) Preferred Package.

On SLT/AT4?Denali - Standard

On base Sierra - not available

 

On Chev 1500

NEW!  Wireless Phone Projection, for Apple CarPlay and Android Auto
LT/RST/LTTB -  Included and only available with (PCM) Convenience Package II.

Standard on LTZ HC

Not available on WT, Custom or CustomTB

Posted
Cross fingers for an OTA update. I have a 2020 SLT and hate the cable for the most part. It does free up the wireless charging pad for my wife's phone.
The stealership told me it was not able to be upgraded. We will see i guess

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Posted
Would it just be a hardware update, radio module?
My brother says his connects over wifi. Seems to mee it could just be software related...

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

Its in final testing now follow along below ? And yes the dealer is correct this is nothing they would be able to do, took a ton of custom work to get all of it integrated 100% OEM but we've got it and its coming! 

 

https://www.facebook.com/WhiteAutoandMedia

Edited by GTPprix
Posted
8 minutes ago, GTPprix said:

Its in final testing now follow along below ? And yes the dealer is correct this is nothing they would be able to do, took a ton of custom work to get all of it integrated 100% OEM but we've got it and its coming! 

 

https://www.facebook.com/WhiteAutoandMedia

Awesome!!!! Can’t wait to see it!!

Posted
On 11/25/2020 at 6:44 PM, GTPprix said:

Its in final testing now follow along below ? And yes the dealer is correct this is nothing they would be able to do, took a ton of custom work to get all of it integrated 100% OEM but we've got it and its coming! 

 

https://www.facebook.com/WhiteAutoandMedia

Any updates?

Posted
Its in final testing now follow along below [emoji6] And yes the dealer is correct this is nothing they would be able to do, took a ton of custom work to get all of it integrated 100% OEM but we've got it and its coming! 
 
https://www.facebook.com/WhiteAutoandMedia
This is fantastic news!

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is NOT impact damage nor neglect. There were previous class action lawsuits because of such paint preparation st GM manufacturing plant. Not just the Cherry Red Color. This paint is applied in three processes to obtain the desired color.  The manufacturer will cover for 36 months or 36k miles only. That rust is actually corrosion because of the paint process failure. Corrosion is covered for 100,100 miles or a certain months. However their corrosion doesn't include this type. Go figure. Clearly manufacturer knew from previous paint issues. This started 3 weeks ago out of the blue.  
    • Is it time to put a piece of tape over the CEL? 
    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...