Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I pulled my flares to change the running lights on my 2020 3500 AT4, in the process I broke some of the retainers clips. I've started searching but the schematic picture is vague and not sure it's what I'm looking for. Anybody know the part number and source?

Posted
I pulled my flares to change the running lights on my 2020 3500 AT4, in the process I broke some of the retainers clips. I've started searching but the schematic picture is vague and not sure it's what I'm looking for. Anybody know the part number and source?
How many you looking for

Sent from my SM-A705U using Tapatalk

Posted
At least 6
I have extras I can ship em to you. Not sure what the dealer charges for them but I make you a good deal

Sent from my SM-A705U using Tapatalk

Posted

go watch the boost auto parts light install video. they have the part numbers in there. 

they are expensive, about $6 each

Posted
13 hours ago, H'sAT4 said:

Thanks for the responses, I did find a part number and  sourced them from Amazon. 

link?

 

Posted

Rexka 30pcs Rocker Panel Moulding Clip 11547581 for GM Enclave, CT6, XT5, XTS, Cruze, Equinox, Impala, Sonic, Traverse, Acadia, Terrain

Posted

Let us know how well they work.  I'm interested!

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I thought these fasteners were part # 11610700, which you can't find anywhere. Hopefully these 11547581 parts work!

Posted

11547581 clips are correct. I installed the smoked sequential fender lights and replaced several clips. The Boost Auto install video says if you are careful and use trim tools, you can get the fender off without breaking the clips. That is not true, go ahead and have the clips on hand because they are going to break.

Sent from my SM-G981U using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

I'm glad to hear they work, but they aren't quite the same as the OEM Clips.  The main thing, however, is that they do work and they are available at an affordable price. The bad news is that they aren't currently available from Amazon. Maybe elsewhere?

Edited by unit
Added text
Posted (edited)

4 different part # clips hold on the front flares on GMC.

 

- 11571006  Calls for X2 one per side.

- 15864780  Calls for x2 so one per flare.

- 11547581  Calls for "As Required" so this one is most used on the flares.

- 11588818  Calls for X4 so 2 per flare.

 

For GMC rear flares:

 

- 11571006  Calls for X4 so 2 per side.

- 15864780  Calls for x2 so one per flare.

- 11547581  Calls for "As Required" so this one is most used on the flares.

 

For CHEVY front flares:

 

- 15864780  Calls for x2 so one per flare.

- 11547581  Calls for "As Required" so this one is most used on the flares.

- 11588818  Calls for X4 so 2 per flare.

 

For CHEVY rear flares:

 

- 11547581  Calls for "As Required".  The only style clip used on the rear CHEVY flares.  

Edited by newdude

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • New member here. I am researching a read-first event-recorder concept for late-model GM V8 trucks. This is not a sales post. There is no product link, price, preorder, or mailing list. I am trying to determine whether the underlying problem is real before building anything.   Has your truck ever had a brief problem such as: - rough running or a momentary misfire - an oil-pressure warning or unusual pressure event - reduced power or a brief stall - a U-code or lost-communication problem - a symptom that disappeared before the dealer or independent shop could reproduce it   If so, I would appreciate the following details: - year, model, engine, and mileage - what happened and under what conditions - whether a DTC and useful freeze-frame data were stored - whether the shop was able to reproduce it - what the eventual confirmed repair was, if known - what additional information would have helped the diagnosis   The concept being evaluated is a removable leave-in recorder that continuously retains a rolling window from before and after an event. It would not tune, reflash, clear codes, or change the vehicle calibration.   I am also not claiming that it could predict lifter failure or see every internal ECM variable.   The real question is whether continuous event history would add enough useful evidence beyond freeze frame, GDS2, and existing scan tools — or whether it would simply be another unnecessary gadget.   For owners and technicians, which problem would make something like this genuinely useful: 1. intermittent misfire or AFM/DFM-related behavior 2. oil-pressure events 3. lost communication or electrical faults 4. none of the above Please be blunt. Negative feedback is just as useful as positive feedback.
    • No tears over the SLE and SLT trim levels disappearing but I kind of loathe the "Elevation" name. It's a truck--skip the elegance.   The slab-dashboard design is decidedly different. Almost has a Hummer flavor to it. "Professional Grade" seems to be leaning very white-collar, tech-driven these days moreso than blue-collar, functional design.   The Silverado would be my choice between the two new trucks. Pleased with the engine lineup in both. The GMC is a little "too much" for a truck, IMO, and the Denali borders on ridiculous - but I do know there are buyers for luxury trucks out there. It's just not my speed.
    • Your safety is of utmost importance, @joshua1221, and we understand the importance of having all your lights working in your truck. If you have not already, we highly encourage you to bring your concerns to the attention of your local GM dealer. They are in the best position to diagnose your concerns as well as confirm the compatibility of the mirrors with your truck. Additionally, we would like the opportunity to explore any way we may be of assistance. When you have a moment, please visit: https://s.gm.com/support-request and fill out the support request form with all pertinent details. This form helps our team gather the right information and ensures your request is routed appropriately.
    • - I like the outside but not as much as the Chevrolet.  They ICE'd the EV styling and it works, but I think exterior goes to Chevy on this one.     - SLE and SLT dead = Not.  Surprising.  Fits into the rest of the GMC lineup like this which (aside from Pro) matches the rest of the family.  Elevation, AT4, Denali.     - Interior.  Sophisticated Malaise era.  Why do I say Malaise?  Drawn with a ruler.  Rectangles everywhere.  Looks very premium though.    
    • I may be old school. But I’ll pass. I’ll stick with the old stuff. Thank you.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...