Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

sky net is already up and running under Elon's SPaceX , they launched over a 1000 mini sats last year. I rememeber watching them being launched out over the west coast. It was facinating seeing a string of sats in a "train line" across the night sky. it must have be over 2000 miles long .

 

Anyways he's selling it as free or lowcost interenet service for impoverished countries.  but they are capable of 24/7 image recording which he can be sold to local state , cities Countries for policing and basic survailance of the people.

Posted
29 minutes ago, diyer2 said:

There are so many things a robot can't do and it will be years before they can. 

like what???

Posted
no reason for human troops to be fresh anymore, you seem to think your needed,. the only human left on the battle field will be mechanics and he's on shaky ground too
Its not about being needed. It's about wanting to do it and being there.

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Posted
like what???

If you dont know then you believe the end of the human species is near because robots can do everything and better.

 

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

  • Confused 1
Posted

You know what happens when there’s not enough work to sustain a population? It shrinks. The environmental people would be extremely happy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
3 hours ago, flyingfool said:

no reason for human troops to be fresh anymore, you seem to think your needed,. the only human left on the battle field will be mechanics and he's on shaky ground too

A troop being "fresh" is a Cold War concept which is more effective today with all the technology.  This is not an even or, technology will keep a troop fresh whether military command structure knows it or not.  Troop numbers have downsized a bit because of technology, but won't be replaced because of technology.  Hollywood is the only place technology doesn't need a troop on the battlefield.  In the real world, human intelligence can't be replaced.  Although, it would be nice to have an android like "Data" (Star Trek Next Gen) working next to me.

Posted
3 hours ago, flyingfool said:

sky net is already up and running under Elon's SPaceX , they launched over a 1000 mini sats last year. I rememeber watching them being launched out over the west coast.

In the last 30 yrs, launches from the Western Range have never been more than 36 per year, 20 of which had nothing to do with satellites.  Your information source is grossly inaccurate.  During my glory days, I was a member of a rocket launch Disaster Control Group.  

Posted
1 hour ago, The Zip said:

In the last 30 yrs, launches from the Western Range have never been more than 36 per year, 20 of which had nothing to do with satellites.  Your information source is grossly inaccurate.  During my glory days, I was a member of a rocket launch Disaster Control Group.  

This might be what he was referring to:

https://www.kmov.com/news/see-a-string-of-lights-in-the-sky-it-was-probably-spacex-s-starlink-satellites/article_ca175fb8-88ff-11ea-acb9-63a781c28857.html

 

The 60 Starlink broadband satellites rode atop one of SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rockets, taking off from Florida’s Kennedy Space Center at 3:30 pm ET. The devices are now coasting through orbit, where they will soon begin climbing to about 340 miles above ground, their operational altitude. This launch brings the total number of Starlink satellites in orbit to more than 400.

 

SpaceX has said the satellites will allow it to beam Internet directly to terminals that consumers will set up at their homes or offices. Service is expected to roll out in the United States and Canada this year, CEO Elon Musk has said. The company plans to eventually grow its constellation to more than 40,000 satellites, blanketing the entire planet in cheap, high-speed Internet connectivity.

Posted
1 hour ago, The Zip said:

In the last 30 yrs, launches from the Western Range have never been more than 36 per year, 20 of which had nothing to do with satellites.  Your information source is grossly inaccurate.  During my glory days, I was a member of a rocket launch Disaster Control Group.  

what's inaccurate ?

Posted
26 minutes ago, aseibel said:

This might be what he was referring to:

https://www.kmov.com/news/see-a-string-of-lights-in-the-sky-it-was-probably-spacex-s-starlink-satellites/article_ca175fb8-88ff-11ea-acb9-63a781c28857.html

 

The 60 Starlink broadband satellites rode atop one of SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rockets, taking off from Florida’s Kennedy Space Center at 3:30 pm ET. The devices are now coasting through orbit, where they will soon begin climbing to about 340 miles above ground, their operational altitude. This launch brings the total number of Starlink satellites in orbit to more than 400.

 

SpaceX has said the satellites will allow it to beam Internet directly to terminals that consumers will set up at their homes or offices. Service is expected to roll out in the United States and Canada this year, CEO Elon Musk has said. The company plans to eventually grow its constellation to more than 40,000 satellites, blanketing the entire planet in cheap, high-speed Internet connectivity.

Kennedy Space Center (KSC) is the Eastern Range launching into a different orbit than the Western Range.  He said he remember watching these launches from the West Coast.  There is no way he could see these KSC launches from LA?

Posted
15 minutes ago, The Zip said:

Kennedy Space Center (KSC) is the Eastern Range launching into a different orbit than the Western Range.  He said he remember watching these launches from the West Coast.  There is no way he could see these KSC launches from LA?

I'm no rocket scientist, I don't even know which way they go once they are airborne, but I do know people in Wisconsin who could see the string of lights from a recent launch. We're pretty far from America's wang up here. Just saying they could be seen from a ways off- not the launch itself, but when they went overhead.

 

Here's the story from a local news station. https://waow.com/2020/04/27/spot-a-line-of-lights-in-the-night-sky-its-most-likely-spacex-starlink-satellites/

 

Posted
28 minutes ago, flyingfool said:

what's inaccurate ?

As a member of a Launch Disaster Control Group (LDCG), you are on the ground in close proximity to a rocket launch.  I have been a member of the LDCG for over 300 rocket and missile launches.  In the best year of the Western Range, there was no more than 3 launches per month.  You watching 1000 launches from the Western range is inaccurate.  That's an average of 83 per month, not possible.

  • Like 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, The Zip said:

As a member of a Launch Disaster Control Group (LDCG), you are on the ground in close proximity to a rocket launch.  I have been a member of the LDCG for over 300 rocket and missile launches.  In the best year of the Western Range, there was no more than 3 launches per month.  You watching 1000 launches from the Western range is inaccurate.  That's an average of 83 per month, not possible.

Did you read the article I shared? It said 60 mini satellites were launched on 1 Falcon 9 rocket. So not 1000 launches, but 1000 satellites in total. 

Posted
1 hour ago, aseibel said:

Did you read the article I shared? It said 60 mini satellites were launched on 1 Falcon 9 rocket. So not 1000 launches, but 1000 satellites in total. 

I read what you wrote, but don't click on untrusted links.  Subject got off track for a minute, I have no more comments about rocket launches.

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, The Zip said:

Kennedy Space Center (KSC) is the Eastern Range launching into a different orbit than the Western Range.  He said he remember watching these launches from the West Coast.  There is no way he could see these KSC launches from LA?

i'm telling you what i saw,  on the west coast Los Angeles San Pedro area. I stood there for "20 minutes"  1 hour after sunset. watching a conga line of sats cruising by West to East..at least 1000 units.  no way will 60 mini sats traverse the sky for this long of a duration. while flying by at a steady speed of a normal satalite in orbit, they where all perfectly spaced probably 50 mile separation.  some one has an interesting project up there if its not  SpaceX stuff.

on a side note, i had a super bright led focusing flashlight and set it to pulse mode. and managed to train it on a few of them. interesting enough one sat pulled off the conga line stopped and gave a relfective flash back at me, then continued back in the group

Edited by flyingfool

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Good morning! I have a whirring sound coming from the engine or transmission area when driving w/o towing when I accelerate at 1100 rpm’s. That’s how it started. Yesterday it was more obvious while towing a U-Haul even when not accelerating at 70 mph. I could see where it may have been possibly shifting gears due to a slight grade and the intermittent rpm changes as the transmission was possibly lowering the gear down. It was making the sound multiple times but it is not constant. I replaced the serpentine belt and idler pulley but no change. It only does it when I’m driving. No noise accelerating while in park. Just started @ 53,000 miles. It’s not always there though. Unfortunately, I feel it may be transmission related. Any thoughts or knowledge about the 2022 tranny that anyone can share. I have 2500 miles left on my p-train warranty. Thanks to all for any help! 
    • RAIN. It's dumping buckets. We needed it. What a welcome change...sitting here listening to it pour with my office window open.   Ok, not too much. It's not even September yet, we're not finished with summer yet....
    • If you have actually done it, there must be some secret tool or method of accessing the hidden bolt head that both manifold connections have. Two of the three bolt heads are staring at you in the face from below but the third one is covered by shielding and as far as I know only accessed by removing part of the fender well lining to gain access to it and even then its awful to access or from what I had seen of someone fighting with it on a video.    There is a reason why even mechanics that deal with the awkward or risky business of undoing the exhaust at the manifolds have done the same method others are doing with these L8T by flexing the exhaust if need be or just able to slip the pan out as I did without needing to touch hardware or pry on the exhaust. By rights the two seals should be replace when those joints are cracked loose as well.     
    • Actually it was a lot more controlled then I thought it might be and that isn't actually when I spilled some oil. I had thought prior of rounding up a couple of longer bolts with the same thread to swap out for a couple of the front edge pan bolts and then leaving one bolt left in the back but loosened off and then using a suction device to remove most of the fluid, that certainly would have worked and while I do have a couple of different devices I could have used to suck the fluid, now having done the job once I wouldn't even bother. I had thought of buying one of those pressurized vessels to suck or new fluid in and would if I was doing a job like this on a few vehicles but with one vehicle I just didn't bother and I have pail pumps as well I could have used assuming the hose end would fit into that less than roomy space but being such a thin fluid it pumped well with a quart type pump and just kept the hose into the trans and kept swapping containers and repeat.    What I would change to the method I did though was first jack up just the rear of the truck to put on jack stands to allow more oil to come out of the check plug on the front of the pan ( and as I did, I made sure to put that drain plug back in finger tight ) then follow through by putting the front on jack stands. Also that I would have used a larger sized drain pan in the sense of covering an area wider/longer beyond the transmission but I didn't have one and saw someone else on a youtube video using a masonry mud mixing tub and bought one at a hardware store to use in the future. The main oopsy  I did and why I spilled some oil was all my fault as I neglected to follow my own plan, I should have let down the pan as I did to drain out the front of it as much as would come out but then scooped out the remainder of the oil with the Dixie cup I had sitting there just for that purpose as by that point there is enough room to reach right into the front of the pan and just bail it out basically. 
    • Pretty easy to just remove/drop the exhaust behind the manifolds. They're in no way hard to get to. Maybe 5min of work, and you get the opportunity to put some anti-sieze on them in case anything ever comes up, you eliminated the risk of snapping a stud. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...