Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What are owners of the 2500 gas Customs getting for gas mileage in City, Highway and Towing travel trailers and campers etc????

TIA

Posted

Not custom but LT. I’m averaging around 12 on short runs. Best of 19.9 on longer trips. Real world I’d say don’t expect much over 14 average. Towing my 5th wheel camper was around 9.9 

Posted

yeah trim wouldnt make huge difference.....

 

mine in city is pretty bad but it loves the highway......8mpg around town...on highway ive seen 22mpg but avg 18-20

have LT as well

Posted

Drove mine cross country and back when I first got it, about 7k miles on that trip. Averaged 17.7 

current mostly local driving averaging about 14

Posted

Rolling empty on the highway at 80, 15.  Local rural driving mid 14s.  Have not yet towed, look forward to camping and boating with it though.  only 1300 mi. on truck so far.

Posted

NY to SC and back going 70-80 got 15.8 according to the truck electronics.  I didn't keep track of the actual gas input.

Posted

great.  awesome.  i have a 2016 2500hd crew with the 6.0 and i was dead set on keeping it forever.

 

 then you freaking jerks come around bragging about your obscenely economical fuel economy and now I’m building and pricing a new truck every three hours!

 

kidding.  but, in all seriousness, the numbers here are significantly better than i see in my six point slow .. average 12.5 in mixed driving with a best of 16 on a long, slow country drive in the summer.

 

sounds like he 6.6 is a great engine.

Posted

I had your exact truck prior to the 20' ,the honest hand calculated difference is about 1 to 1.5 mpg better on hwy. Too many variables to make an honest comparison for in town driving unless they where done simultaneously . I believe the difference in town is .5 mpg maybe? Towing 12k fiver the difference is also about.5 mpg. It does however tow more effortlessly in comparison.

  • Like 1
Posted

A slight MPG increase sounds realistic over a 6.0, but nothing earth shattering when dealing with a big heavy truck.  However the power and torque have increased quite a bit so it should perform better with heavy loads.

Posted

Nobody that buys a pickup truck cares about "fuel economy". Drive it, enjoy it then fill it up and rinse & repeat. When gasoline makes it to $7.00 a gallon that may actually bother a few but certainly not all.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, MORSNO said:

A slight MPG increase sounds realistic over a 6.0, but nothing earth shattering when dealing with a big heavy truck.  However the power and torque have increased quite a bit so it should perform better with heavy loads.

 

They've gained a good bit of weight too over K2 and especially GMT-900.  Power may be up but so is weight.  The 6.6 in the K2s would have ripped.  

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, It's Tim said:

Nobody that buys a pickup truck cares about "fuel economy". Drive it, enjoy it then fill it up and rinse & repeat. When gasoline makes it to $7.00 a gallon that may actually bother a few but certainly not all.

it’s not so much a question of whether to own a truck, but which truck to own.  for instance, if a 6.6 gets 2 mpg better than my 6.0, that’s about $600 per year or $4200 savings over seven years.  If it only gets .5 mpg, that’s closer to 1k over seven years.

 

You’re damned right I think about the impact of four grand on a financial decision such as buying a new truck.  Just like running the numbers when you refinance a house or put in a new heat pump or furnace - understanding the math on each financial decision you make can make a big difference over a lifetime.

Edited by i82much
Posted

Still not worth freting over when you have to run the numbers out to seven years, inflation will have eaten your savings. Either a person needs a truck and they buy it for that purpose or people buy a truck to be broke and stylish. The stylers will be the first to run away when gasoline hits $4.00 a gallon. Notice for instance on this website alone if anyone posts a picture of their dash the fuel gauge is always ever so slightly above "walk". Better to drive a vehicle one can run down to a third of a tank then fill it back up without worrying about the cost of fuel. JMHO.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,743 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...