Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Since GM didn't offer the RSE (rear seat entertainment) for the 19+ trucks, has anyone found a way to add video to factory screen?  I am been talking with the guys at MVI (gm-navigation.com) about using the front camera option, which would allow me to come out of the module with an HDMI, but am unsure.  It isn't a desired function and I have a few concerns.  I want my passengers to be able to watch video (either adding a blu-ray player or screen mirror from a phone).

Posted

Seems pricey.  I was hoping for something that would integrate into the factory stereo, similar to the previous body style.  We also wanted the video to be viewable from the front seats (passenger, etc.).

Posted
3 hours ago, EZ Money said:

Seems pricey.  I was hoping for something that would integrate into the factory stereo, similar to the previous body style.  We also wanted the video to be viewable from the front seats (passenger, etc.).

Same setup here for 500 less
https://www.shopchevyparts.com/electronics/2020-silverado-1500-rear-seat-infotainment-system-with-dvd-player-black-vinyl/84556195-p-92305781.html

Posted

I still cannot see that on the front screen.  I’m looking for something that will play video on the front screen.

Posted
3 hours ago, lapoolboy said:

Don't bother....the resolution is garbage.

Resolution is probably 720.  It better than DVD quality and should show a blu-ray just fine seeing as it’s only 8”.

Posted

I have an Mvi system on my 18 Sierra.  My picture is great for dvd,  firestick, and cameras. 

Posted

Yes, I had their system in my ‘15 Sierra and we have one in our ‘19 Tahoe, but nothing for the new Infotainment system.

They were telling me about a front camera option that has an HDMI input but their site has been down for a few days.

Posted
15 hours ago, EZ Money said:

I still cannot see that on the front screen.  I’m looking for something that will play video on the front screen.

Not to be a downer, but if you figure this out you better remember to turn it off if you get pulled over. There is a reason that auto manufactures lock this out on the front screen.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, mjonesjr84 said:

Not to be a downer, but if you figure this out you better remember to turn it off if you get pulled over. There is a reason that auto manufactures lock this out on the front screen.

Agreed.... this is as bad if not worse than fumbling around on your phone in many areas.  Generally around 250 bucks 

 

As a biker, I also cringe at this

  • Like 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, mjonesjr84 said:

Not to be a downer, but if you figure this out you better remember to turn it off if you get pulled over. There is a reason that auto manufactures lock this out on the front screen.

Do you ever drive over the posted speed limit?  Because you get a ticket for that too.

 

I've actually had front seat video capability in my vehicles for the past 20+ years...since I had my 2nd car when I was 18.  I'm pretty versed on the laws and what I have to do if I get pulled over.

Posted
1 minute ago, EZ Money said:

Do you ever drive over the posted speed limit?  Because you get a ticket for that too.

 

I've actually had front seat video capability in my vehicles for the past 20+ years...since I had my 2nd car when I was 18.  I'm pretty versed on the laws and what I have to do if I get pulled over.

Sure do, doesn't make it right.

 

Video playing on a screen, ie distracted driving, is more dangerous than speeding. 

Posted
18 minutes ago, Rob Mugs said:

Agreed.... this is as bad if not worse than fumbling around on your phone in many areas.  Generally around 250 bucks 

 

As a biker, I also cringe at this

Just the opposite for me.  I've had front seat video capability in every vehicles I've owned for the past 20 years.  I tend to speed and change lanes alot, but throw on a video and it calms me down.  I don't really watch it as much as I do listen.  Not sure why, but its different than plain music.

Posted
12 minutes ago, mjonesjr84 said:

Sure do, doesn't make it right.

 

Video playing on a screen, ie distracted driving, is more dangerous than speeding. 

Just the opposite for me.  I would say I am less distracted with a video playing.  I tend to speed and change lanes alot, but throw on a video and it calms me down.  I don't really watch it as much as I do listen.  Not sure why, but its different than plain music.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks - I wasn't quite caffeinated this morning. 2:1 makes sense, turning the crankshaft 360 degrees will turn the cam 180 degrees, and had I done that, the cam's dot would be at 6 and the crank's at 12 again.   I went ahead and took the sprocket off anyway, aligned everything dot-to-dot including the balance shaft just for s&g. I'm glad I did because I discovered no Loctite on the timing sprocket bolts. Maybe it's not required, but at only 20 ft-lb torque spec, those bolts aren't in there very tight. Cleaned and reassembled with some thread locker and torqued.   A general observation: Less is more with RTV. If a little doesn't stop a leak, a LOT probably won't, either. RTV is thinly veiled revenge, in a tube...      
    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...