Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Motor L86

oil loss = about 1 quart every 2k miles

-happened since I bought the truck with 20k miles, now has 60k miles

-street tuned by justin at blackbear. When looking at the live data he said it definitely doesn’t look like its the rings. Not sure how he could tell that.

-i also don’t think its the rings...because if I take it easy on my truck for a few days, and then I go WOT, I get a ton of black smoke out of the tailpipe. But this doesn’t happen if I go WOT frequently. Which means in my theory is, the oil is collecting somewhere and then is getting sucked into the engine at WOT. Once I deplete the pool of oil, it stops smoking. Typically when vehicles have bad rings, it will happen every time you go WOT.

 

where the F is it going? It must be fixable without a rebuild if it’s not the rings and some peoples trucks don’t burn any oil.

Edited by truckguy82
Posted (edited)

i think these new engines have weak oil control rings installed on the pistons wile using very thin 0-20 oil,  it might help if you use 5w-30 or 10-30w this summer, see if that helps

 

try installing a cheapo catch can off amazon inline with the pcv system

Edited by pokismoki
Posted (edited)

fyi..............

Quote

Oil Consumption
The accepted rate of oil consumption for engines used in the vehicles referenced is 0.946 liter (1 qt) in 3200 km (2000 mi).

Important: This rate only applies to personal use vehicles, under warranty, that are driven in a non-aggressive manner and maintained in accordance with the appropriate maintenance schedule, with less than 58,000 km (36,000 mi), or driven at legal speeds in an unloaded (for trucks) condition.

Important: This rate does not apply to vehicles that are driven in an aggressive manner, at high RPM, high speeds, or in a loaded condition (for trucks). Oil consumption for vehicles driven under these conditions will be more.

Many factors can affect a customer's concern with oil consumption. Driving habits and vehicle maintenance vary from owner to owner. Thoroughly evaluate each case before deciding whether the vehicle in question has abnormal engine oil consumption.
 

 

Edited by elcamino
  • Like 1
Posted

Thats about how much my cammed L86 drinks in the summer.  I did the same thing before I had the cam too.

Posted

0.03% to 0.05% of the fuel burnt is the normal and useful range, new to needs a hard look. As fuel it tied to load and tune.....

 

This is far less than the GM 'canned' reply for warranty work. This isn't 'normal' by any school of engineering. It IS the point at which GM is willing to do something about it. "Normal" is the word they use to make you feel better about a truly awful lie they are telling. 

 

There is one form of leak you will never see on the ground. Intake manifold runner gaskets. Just tossing that out there. Rings one would check with a 'leak down' test. Not live data :wtf:

 

When is the last time the PCV valve was checked? Failed open will build a puddle. Plugged baffles in the drivers side valve co cover. Something is 'pressure balance" amiss. 

  • Like 1
Posted
22 hours ago, pokismoki said:

i think these new engines have weak oil control rings installed on the pistons wile using very thin 0-20 oil,  it might help if you use 5w-30 or 10-30w this summer, see if that helps

 

try installing a cheapo catch can off amazon inline with the pcv system

Tried 5-30 no difference

Posted
18 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

0.03% to 0.05% of the fuel burnt is the normal and useful range, new to needs a hard look. As fuel it tied to load and tune.....

 

This is far less than the GM 'canned' reply for warranty work. This isn't 'normal' by any school of engineering. It IS the point at which GM is willing to do something about it. "Normal" is the word they use to make you feel better about a truly awful lie they are telling. 

 

There is one form of leak you will never see on the ground. Intake manifold runner gaskets. Just tossing that out there. Rings one would check with a 'leak down' test. Not live data :wtf:

 

When is the last time the PCV valve was checked? Failed open will build a puddle. Plugged baffles in the drivers side valve co cover. Something is 'pressure balance" amiss. 

I’m going down the rabbit whole of the pcv system.

 

the thing is, i’ve looked into my intake several times since I use valve cleaner before each oil change. I’ve never noticed any oil in the folds of the intake hose, on the butterfly valve, or inside my limited view of the intake mani.

 

But it has to be pooling somewhere. You should see the smoke at WOT if I’ve been babying the truck for awhile. Just a huge cloud of black behind me like I have a diesel. Then it goes away completely. If I drive like an ass for multiple days, there will be no smoke.

 

i’m pretty sure that eliminates any sort of internal engine issues.

 

One thing I found, on the 2017 c7 vettes, is that they reduced the diameter of the breather tubes. (There’s probably a lot more to it than just thinner tubes) Then I found a random post from a seemingly educated man how to breather tubes for our motors are too big. Hmmm

Posted

Also I found out the v6 uses a totally different pcv and afm manifold. Wonder if the v6’s are pretty much all oil consumption free.

Posted
4 minutes ago, truckguy82 said:

Also I found out the v6 uses a totally different pcv and afm manifold. Wonder if the v6’s are pretty much all oil consumption free.

Hardly?  GM revised yet again on the LGX 60 High feature for the previous couple iterations and oil consumption.....Your oil will continue to disappear with your dirty rings that simple. 

Posted
23 hours ago, truckguy82 said:

.because if I take it easy on my truck for a few days, and then I go WOT, I get a ton of black smoke out of the tailpipe. But this doesn’t happen if I go WOT frequently. Which means in my theory is, the oil is collecting somewhere and then is getting sucked into the engine at WOT. Once I deplete the pool of oil, it stops smoking. Typically when vehicles have bad rings, it will happen every time you go WOT.

 

I 'think' if this were the case it would be blue-tinted smoke not black. Just sounds like a big fuel dump, meaning the EQ ratio might be a bit rich. BB likely tuned it on the safe side if you don't have a wideband. 

Posted
40 minutes ago, truckguy82 said:

Also I found out the v6 uses a totally different pcv and afm manifold. Wonder if the v6’s are pretty much all oil consumption free.

I couldn't say and wish I knew. The V6's also don't suffer crazy torque converter failures either. They use a different one altogether. Truth is every motor uses some but over the normal OCI's we just can't measure it. 

 

On the wife's 2.4 I used QSUD and decent filters on 7.5K OCI's and the rings gave up around 80K. A quart in 600 miles. We top end soaked that motor twice using the GM cleaner for this problem and several crankcase flushes and now have it down to a quart in 10K. Still using DEXOS1Gen2 just changing it every 2.5K with filter. As you can see I keep track and it took a good long while but we did get it freed up. Well better anyway. 

 

image.png.5007cb21e581c9b967a73febd522401f.png 

 

Pepper was only on DEXOS1Gen2 for about 30K when I switched it to Red Line and then latter AMSOIL and it has always received 5K OCI's. I also cooled the motor down which cooled the oil down. Likely not such a big deal with AMSOIL but the mineral based DEXOS oils are not quite as robust in oxidation resistance. Never moves on the stick between changes with but a hint of oil dampness in the PCV hose. What both of those motors have in common are low tension rings.

 

When a motor starts using some oil and you run it softer it gets a soft coat of carbon on the piston top that burns off easy when you matt it. Another possible explanation for the smoke after taking it easy. 

 

Kid you not. When Sugar Bears motor was pumping oil like a Texas oil well it never smoked. Weird.

 

Anyway, MOOK got me thinking about this some more.....  

Posted
2 hours ago, lucas287 said:

I 'think' if this were the case it would be blue-tinted smoke not black. Just sounds like a big fuel dump, meaning the EQ ratio might be a bit rich. BB likely tuned it on the safe side if you don't have a wideband. 

Its not from running rich, have had several high hp cars with widebands. 
 

it did the exact same thing before the BB tune.

 

It also highly variable, it all depends on how often I get on it. The only thing that could really be happening is something pooling up. I suppose it could be water in the muffler too, but that wouldn’t vaporize that fast. And our mufflers have a drain.

Posted
1 hour ago, truckguy82 said:

Its not from running rich
 

Maybe so! Hey @JONBLARC7 did you ever get yours to stop black smoking at WOT? Ran across a thread over on HP Tuners where you were trying to nail down EQ ratios to remedy it. 

 

1 hour ago, truckguy82 said:

have had several high hp cars with widebands. 

were they direct injected?

Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, lucas287 said:

Maybe so! Hey @JONBLARC7 did you ever get yours to stop black smoking at WOT? Ran across a thread over on HP Tuners where you were trying to nail down EQ ratios to remedy it. 

 

were they direct injected?

I think you missed a key part

 

it only smokes a couple times when I haven’t driven it spirited in awhile.

 

when you’re WOT the ecu switches to open loop. Open loop means you’re not using sensor data and then adjusting based on those readings. The 02 sensors are bypassed. The fuel tables are pre-programmed and will be the same every time you put your foot down. If I was running rich, it would do it every time. I’m well aware of black smoke from running rich. I’m also well aware that a lot of cars produce black smoke when they first stomp the go pedal. This is not one of those circumstances.

 

i literally used to drive around with a laptop in my passenger seat for years and monitored the wideband afr, egt’s, oil pressure and temp, intake temp, intake pressure (fabbed up my own intake temp sensor setup)

 

granted it was obd1 and used a map sensor, so, maf’s, knock sensors, and multiple o2 sensors are greek to me

Edited by truckguy82

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks!  I figured as such; GM and other manufacturers have used standard parts and harnesses across trim levels and such for decades.  I pulled the blank accessory cover off of my commuter van (a 2016 or so Chevy 15-passenger) years ago and found the plug for a USB outlet.  It wasn't connected to anything, though (I tried swapping in an outlet from another van).  I was a GM Tech years ago (late-90s) and was pretty familiar with my 2006.  I might be wrong, but I view newer vehicles (pretty much anything made in the past 20 years) as being a lot more plug and play.  Meaning, more unused wires and plugs unless you have the Mack Daddy of vehicles.    
    • not all plugs will be used.  gm uses more generic harnesses that support most/all options, and if your truck doesn't have a specfiic option, the plug won't be used (commonly will have a dummy insert in the plug , or it'll be taped up, but some may just be left as is).  But it's sldo possible some p.o. has installed the wrong/cheaper parts that aren't correct for your vehicle...
    • First off, I'm not trying to just get easy advice/fixes for the issues I've noticed so far.  I'll be combing through the site via searches and such, and if past experiences are any indication, should find what I need.  For the sake of conversation, though, I figured I'd post the handful of things I've noticed in the 12 hours since buying my 2010 SLE CCSB.     Indicator lights: Airbag and TPMS.  The tire pressures aren't reading for any of the wheels, so I'm pretty certain the sensors were either removed, are damaged, or are otherwise inoperable.  I used to mount and balance tires 25 years ago but am pretty much ignorant when it comes to TPMS.  My 2006 didn't have the sensors and this might be the fourth vehicle I've owned that does.     Radio: Rear speakers aren't working.  I removed the driver's side rear door panel and checked the speaker and wiring.  I also removed the sill and b-pillar covers to check the wiring.  A few minutes of Google Fu showed that this is potentially a head unit issue.    Switches: Power mirrors don't turn left/right.  I ordered replacement driver's door switches that should arrive tomorrow.  The windows and locks work but it was only about $20 for all of them.  The driver's side rear window switch lets the window down but won't put it back up.  I think the passenger rear doesn't work at all.  In the coming days/weeks, I'll break out my multimeter to check all of that.   Unknown wiring harness: There's a box attached to the front driver's side of the engine compartment, right where the second battery shelf is located.  There are three plugs, one of which looks like it fits a standard headlight-style bulb (9007 or similar).  It doesn't look like it's plugged into anything.  I'll do some digging and if I don't see anything elsewhere on the site, post some pictures here.   Unknown plugs on brake booster: There are at least two female plugs on the brake booster that aren't being used.  I think it might be a replacement/aftermarket, so maybe those are used for a different application, as there don't seem to be any unplugged harnesses and no indicator lights are on.   Little squeaks when turning: Sounds almost like a bushing around the bed of the truck.  I'll have to pay close attention as I get more familiar with the truck.   Clunk on acceleration: possibly the infamous drivetrain clunk.  My 2006 had it and I'm just not familiar enough with this truck yet to fully grasp what it is.   Anyway, my apologies for the vague and all over the place post.  This truck is new to me, and it's been four years since I drove my 2006.  With 200k miles, I know I'll need to learn this truck quickly to avoid having any major issues, despite being confident it's got much more life to it.  My 2006 had nearly 320k on it when I parked it (nearly 300k of which I put on the truck), and it was still drivable then, though I suspected the head gasket might have blown.  I'd hoped to have that truck back by now, but it's gone forever, as I detailed in my reintroduction thread.  
    • I always drive in Sport mode. With more driving, I am finding the initial response when accelerating is much quicker now🖕 Lou
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...