Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
On 8/21/2021 at 6:55 AM, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Most of those variables lie with the end user. Not the producer and that is good for the OEM. You are making my point for me.

 

They don't need to put holes in the inner fender liners (vents? Yea, right) in Dodge pickups to pack salt into a space nearly impossible for Joe Average to clean out. The previous generations did not have them and lasted much longer. No need to abandon coatings that are rust preventative. 

 

No need to design a motor vent system that freezes killing rings and motors in 80-100K either. GM Ecotec I4's. Then not correcting it when it is causing the OEM issues?  We already have the tech and have for decades to vent a motor properly. 

 

First calculator I ever saw was $600 and made by Texas Instrument. You can buy one with the SAME features the original had in the beginning for $1 at any Dollar General. A few of them have enough processing power to run everything in a car. But the story is????? 

 

Motor tech has come so far our grandfathers would not recognize them anymore as familiar. If Honda can build a motor capable of a hundred horses per liter and make it live with poor maintenance a half million miles ON THE CHEAP, what is GM's excuse? 

 

There was a chapter in How to Hotrod Small Block Chevy's by Peterson Publications decades ago that told the story of GM's development of the Mouse Motor. 150% overload for millions of cycles was the GOAL for the rods and the end product was realized in the lightest strongest rod package ever built for a production motor. GM engineers are not incapable, their bosses are just greedy in a stupid sort of way. 

 

Oh the tech is there but these guys are so short sighted in every aspect that they toss fortunes away for instant gratification and board member approval while killing their futures and those of the planet. How short sighted? The next physical quarter. Sometimes the end of business today. 

 

 “It does not belong to man who is walking even to direct his step.” Jeremiah 10:23 

Sorry, I was not completely clear in what I was trying to relay:

 

See the source image

GM does not make this part, if it fails, I can blame the General, but was it really his fault?

Too many variables to me is too many witches' making the brew. The more hands involved, more likely to have failures.

Edited by JimCost2014
Posted
2 hours ago, JimCost2014 said:

Sorry, I was not completely clear in what I was trying to relay:

 

See the source image

GM does not make this part, if it fails, I can blame the General, but was it really his fault?

Too many variables to me is too many witches' making the brew. The more hands involved, more likely to have failures.

 

Ah! What use to be given a individual or a small team of engineers all in the same house is now piecemealed to a half dozen teams all over the globe. Yes...too many cooks in the kitchen spoils the soup. I don't remember the name of the software we use to use for inventory control but it was designed like this. Every page had a different method and means and it took a bible sized set of notes to navigate it. Full of errors. Junk...

Posted
On 8/20/2021 at 12:54 AM, SilveradoRST said:

Does the flush really get all of the old ATF out of the transmission?   How do they deal with the fluid inside the cooler lines?   

The fluid exchange is done from the cooler lines.  They disconnect them at the cooler and hook up their exchange equipment.  The new fluid is put in the machine and when they start the truck up the old fluid is pushed out into a bladder on top of the new fluid bladder and that pushes the new fluid back into the system.  They use more than what the capacity of the transmission takes to make sure it is a complete exchange.  I was told they use 20qts total. 

 

So the entire system has fresh fluid pushed through it until the new fluid comes back out.   When they are done they then hook it all back up and run it to temp and check fluid level and top up as needed.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, Black02Silverado said:

The fluid exchange is done from the cooler lines.  They disconnect them at the cooler and hook up their exchange equipment.  The new fluid is put in the machine and when they start the truck up the old fluid is pushed out into a bladder on top of the new fluid bladder and that pushes the new fluid back into the system.  They use more than what the capacity of the transmission takes to make sure it is a complete exchange.  I was told they use 20qts total. 

 

So the entire system has fresh fluid pushed through it until the new fluid comes back out.   When they are done they then hook it all back up and run it to temp and check fluid level and top up as needed.

This is great info, thanks!  I found the 2 TSB involving the ATF exchange.  18-NA-355 (Silverado/Sierra '15-'19 LD) and 19-NA-121 (Silverado/Sierra '19 New Body).  

 

Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like for 18-NA-355 it talks about using 2qts of the new fluid to flush out the cooler lines (Page 5, step 28).  

 

But for 19-NA-121, it says to only use shop air at 50psi to blow the old fluid out of the cooler lines (Page 5, step 25).  No new ATF is used to flush the cooler lines for the '19 New Body.

 

Am I reading that wrong?  (Sorry if I'm hijacking the thread).

 

Edit:  I know we are talking about oz. in the cooler lines, so not a big deal.  Just clarifying for my own knowledge.

MC-10163890-9999.pdf MC-10174268-9999.pdf

Edited by SilveradoRST
Posted
29 minutes ago, SilveradoRST said:

This is great info, thanks!  I found the 2 TSB involving the ATF exchange.  18-NA-355 (Silverado/Sierra '15-'19 LD) and 19-NA-121 (Silverado/Sierra '19 New Body).  

 

Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like for 18-NA-355 it talks about using 2qts of the new fluid to flush out the cooler lines (Page 5, step 28).  

 

But for 19-NA-121, it says to only use shop air at 50psi to blow the old fluid out of the cooler lines (Page 5, step 25).  No new ATF is used to flush the cooler lines for the '19 New Body.

 

Am I reading that wrong?  (Sorry if I'm hijacking the thread).

 

Edit:  I know we are talking about oz. in the cooler lines, so not a big deal.  Just clarifying for my own knowledge.

MC-10163890-9999.pdf 779.03 kB · 0 downloads MC-10174268-9999.pdf 544.7 kB · 0 downloads

They hook to the cooler lines that run from the transmission to the radiator and cooler.  So they don't push the fluid through the cooler like one would think.  So that is why they say to push out the old fluid with air or new fluid.  Now if you have a transmission that goes out and puts a ton of crap in the fluid, you really need to flush out the lines well to make sure nothing is in there.

 

 

Posted (edited)

I had to bring in 18 quarts to flush mine completely last week.  Think it holds not quite 12 quarts.  The remaining was used to flush the lines and what not as stated in the other members post.

 

Something to keep in mind, if you're going to be using your own fluids... You need more than what it calls for capacity.

Edited by Swiftks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Most online suppliers and Amazon. All have noted "not for use with Bose speakers".
    • Very interesting thread. Definitely didn’t expect to see this kind of mileage out of that engine. 
    • Just did an injector/HPFP replacement on Pepper at 192,400 miles; close enough to 200K, RIGHT? (If 200K is considered life end and to me it isn't). But hey, to each his own.    Have never run a catch can on this vehicle. Back side of every valve looked like a new valve spray painted semigloss black. Port walls looked 'neat' (all a normal result of passive EGR via VVT) Zero build up even in AFM cylinders. Just color. It uses no measurable oil and never has.    At 155,000 I put her on E-85 and a borescope of the cylinders at plug change showed very clean pistons and valve faces. The replaced injector tips looked new. (It was the pump piston seal that was leaking). Oh well, have six good backups.    Still gets 28 mpg on gas (highway average) and over 20 (highway) on alky. UOA's look good and runs as good now as it did when I bought it. Better in fact.    What improvement would a Catch Can provide this motor?     And given all this I expect that IF I installed one I'd see some water/gas/oil vapor accumulation. Byproducts of normal combustion.   Having said that, IF my motor used an appreciable amount of oil I'd consider it a useful 'crutch' until I had the situation corrected OR if bore polished, until I junked it or rebuilt it to stave off repeated plug fouling.    I'm not telling you what I THINK. But what its DONE.          
    • Love the look. I'm a SCSB lover myself.    Two items. 1.) A spacer changes scrub radius but this also changes when we use wheels of different offsets. A little isn't a big deal. 2.) Steel wheels, alloy wheels all have different thickness. Same effect on the stud and lug nut as a spacer. When hub centric the wheel isn't supported by the stud. It's supported by the hub. The stud just keeps it all together.  
    • I had a evap sol go bad a couple weeks ago. . I replaced it.  While watching live data at the time I saw I had some cylinder 1 misfires. No MIL but on live data I could see ~50 at startup and about 70 more after an hour a drive all on cyl 1.  I also noticed that the LTFT were -5% to -15% always.  And that bank 2 is always -3% richer than bank 1. Even across all driving modes, city, highway, etc it’s always 3% richer than bank 1. So I start with the misfire. Swapped coil, plug, and plug wires from 1 to 3. No follow. I got an Injector reseal kit, pulled the D/s injector rail, swapped #1 and #3 injectors, resealed them, reinstalled and retested.  The misfire followed to 3. So I ordered and replaced all 8 injectors, spark plugs, and plug wires. Also replaced the 1 time use fuel pipes under the intake manifold.  Injectors that were in the truck since new were  Part # 12668390.  I replaced them with # 12742701 Got from RockAuto. Pretty certain they’re genuine and the correct ones. I called a friend at a parts store who told me “the 12742701 were the correct superseded part # for the originals I was replacing”. So started truck after replacing all that and it’s running -15 - -30 LTFTs. I reset the fuel trims with GDS2 and drove it for a 60 miles trip each way. There have been no changes in the LTFTs.  I checked if the HPFP was leaking into the crankcase. I removed the pvc and watched the trims. No difference.  I checked the alcohol content and it was at 10%  I’m out of ideas here. Truck seems to run great. Just always rich on the fuel trims.  Anyone with any help or ideas would be greatly appreciated.  I ran an injector balance test just for the heck of it and it came back this. I’m confused.  I have gds2 and some other diag tools if anyone knows of anything I should test next.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...