Jump to content

Coolant Leak 2015 Sierra

SkiDooNick700
 Share

Recommended Posts

SkiDooNick700 Enthusiast

SkiDooNick700

Posted
Posted

Hey guys,  2015 GMC Sierra 6.2 NHT April 2015 build. 

 

All of a sudden I've got a coolant leak but haven't been able to pinpoint where from.   I see the drivers side frame wet and will drip to the ground.   Coolant level already down up to 2 inches from Cold line.   It's even wet on the back side of the lower valence. Just noticed this leak after a 200-300 mile trip back from vacation.  

 

Dried up the frame,  took it on a 3 mile drive,  already dripping with coolant.

 

Any advice? I am not sure where else to look - might need to start pulling stuff off the truck to get a better view?

Is my truck build date part of the known TSB? Is it possible to see the stress cracks per the TSB without disassembling anything?

 

 

20210804_175635.jpg

SkiDooNick700 Enthusiast

SkiDooNick700

Posted
  • Author
Posted
55 minutes ago, Snowcamo said:

Bottom of the water pump usually has a weep hole. Try there. That's not to bad of a job if your mech inclined.

 

I will have to take a look to see if it is wet.   It didn't cross my mind to check it.  

 

50 minutes ago, CamGTP said:

$5 it's the radiator that needs to be replaced.

 

I am worried this may be the case lol.   There is like a tray or something running under the radiator and it is wet all along it from what I am able to see visually. 

SkiDooNick700 Enthusiast

SkiDooNick700

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, CrawlSlow said:

I would start with the easy stuff first before taking things apart.. Drain plug, check along side of radiator to see if it's wet.

 

Thanks for the tips.  Is the drain on the passenger side? 

 

As far a checking the sides of the radiator,  I swear I've looked at every possible angle top and bottom left and right and I am not able to get a clear visual of the sides of radiator. 

 

I watched a video it seems like a pretty quick process to remove the top cover piece,  air box, and fans.   Thinking this might help my view out. 

Edited by SkiDooNick700
SkiDooNick700 Enthusiast

SkiDooNick700

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Well guys looks wet at drivers side corner of radiator.   I'm thinking it is cracked somewhere?  Going to try to pressure test.

 

It was pretty easy to get the fans out the way,  just took me a while to figure out the clips and such.   I need to buy the right tool for the job lol. 

20210805_175819.jpg

  • Like 1
SkiDooNick700 Enthusiast

SkiDooNick700

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 8/4/2021 at 8:06 PM, CamGTP said:

$5 it's the radiator that needs to be replaced.

 

You appear to be the winner!  Took some things apart including removing fan shroud.   Did a pressure test,  the drivers side corner of radiator is leaking.  It was a pool in no time. 

 

Now to find a new one,  looks like GM replaced with a new part number. 

  • Like 1
SkiDooNick700 Enthusiast

SkiDooNick700

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 hours ago, Gagliano7 said:

https://www.rockauto.com/en/catalog/chevrolet,2015,silverado+1500,5.3l+v8,3307665,cooling+system,radiator,2172

 

Thanks yep I used RockAuto to figure out the updated number.   Called a local "dealer" who has one in stock,  about 350$.  Had to purchase via their website to get that price otherwise they have to sell for 500+ in person. Something about GM e-commerce policy. 

  • Like 1
Ravenkeeper Senior Enthusiast

Ravenkeeper

Posted
Posted
On 8/4/2021 at 5:00 PM, Snowcamo said:

Bottom of the water pump usually has a weep hole. Try there. That's not to bad of a job if your mech inclined.

Usually when the water pump plug goes, it's a huge mess, and not driveable.   It will blow out all of your coolant.

 

On 8/6/2021 at 6:39 AM, SkiDooNick700 said:

 

Thanks yep I used RockAuto to figure out the updated number.   Called a local "dealer" who has one in stock,  about 350$.  Had to purchase via their website to get that price otherwise they have to sell for 500+ in person. Something about GM e-commerce policy. 

Cheaper than RA?

SkiDooNick700 Enthusiast

SkiDooNick700

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 hours ago, Ravenkeeper said:

Usually when the water pump plug goes, it's a huge mess, and not driveable.   It will blow out all of your coolant.

 

Cheaper than RA?

 

Rock Auto has it for 335 plus $20 shipped.   It was more or less a wash.   At that point I said to myself let me get locally if I can instead of having a radiator potentially tossed around by UPS or FedEx.

 

Finished install of new one last night,  took on 20 minute test drive.  All seems good so far.   I need to do a good washing of the engine bay now, there is so much coolant still down the frame and such lol. 

 

I think I am going to order a new T Stat, my temp gage always fluctuated a tad but very very recently (last 100 miles)  it's doing some big swings, from 210 down a line and back up to almost 210.

 

Also my idle seemed kinda rough yesterday not sure what is up with that.  She's going through a phase!

  • Like 2
diyer2 Senior Enthusiast

diyer2

Posted
Posted

 instead of having a radiator potentially tossed around by UPS or FedEx.

 

They delivered the part you bought I bet. 

Z45 Senior Enthusiast

Z45

Posted
Posted (edited)

There was a service bulletin on leaks, had my 2015 repaired under warranty for leaks.  In short faulty thermostat cause radiator failure.

Quote

This condition may be the result of excessive thermocycles within the cooling system caused by excessive cycling of the thermostat. These excessive thermocycles within the coolant system may cause the tubes to fatigue, crack and leak at the radiator headers. To correct this condition, a new thermostat has been designed that eliminates the
thermostats excessive cycling.   If this condition is found, in addition to replacing the radiator, the engine coolant thermostat housing (w/thermostat) must also be replaced. Refer to Engine Coolant Thermostat Housing Replacement in SI, which is located in the Engine Heating and Cooling section.

 

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiA-7iSyqvyAhUIVc0KHd6zACMQFnoECAYQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.nhtsa.gov%2Fodi%2Ftsbs%2F2019%2FMC-10155058-9999.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2ifEl9-OC04g37-bj7JXC2

Edited by elcamino

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...