Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

my 21' works well in certain scenarios. If it's long straight highway it does very well. If it's winding 2 lane roads with the sun on the horizon, it will disable itself frequently. I figure at least it is smart enough to know it can't work correctly.

 

I also like that you can adjust the distance for spacing between the car in front. I'm sure they are still working out some calibration settings, but overall I like it's features. But I do not consider this autopilot like others may.

Edited by black00ta
Posted
9 hours ago, Jeremy Menard said:

I also had a similar issue.  Front brake assist or collision avoidance failed.  Vibration and red warning after fender bender at front passenger.   $6300 damage and GM denied my claim.   GM isn't standing behind their safety systems on a $65,000 truck 

So you're saying it's GM's fault that you wrecked your truck?  

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, AirForceAngler said:

So you're saying it's GM's fault that you wrecked your truck?  

:rollin: The audacity of some people, can't take responsibility for their own actions, they just want to play the blame game. I actually think it is because he didn't spend enough. If he had spent $70k on the truck it would have been enough to ensure the safety systems never ever fail and work 100% of the time to keep him safe while being a distracted driver. I also never understood the "I spent $XX amount I am entitled to this" argument...

 

Tyler

Posted

Sounds like some need to read the owners manual to learn what it is supposed to do and the warnings about what that it will not do.

 

 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Finally got into see the service department about the adaptive cruise malfunction. Had a video which showed that it was temporarily out of service. No surprise here, they could find nothing wrong after running a diagnosis on the system. I had it happen again after taking it in. It was around 8 am and I was heading east on the same highway, the sun was low in the horizon and right in front of me. I suspect that this was the cause of the problem. Seems like they could come up with better technology that would work better.

Posted

I think we'll see these issues for a long time, until they put sensors in the road that talk to the car, and possibly even cars that monitor each other.   The reality is using optical cameras for staying in a lane, only works when the camera can see the lane markings clearly, rain/snow/direct sun, are always going to blind it.   If they used more cameras with more angles of view it would help, but there's only so many angles you can get on the front of a car.

 

The radar is great with cars and objects, but it can't identify lanes, unless they started using radar reflective lane tags.  Ideally you'd have something in the roadway itself the car can track.  Other wavelength cameras would do better in rain/snow and be less impacted by sunshine, but I doubt we'll see car companies use them anytime soon. 

 

Car companies clearly are not really interested in using the cameras in the best way possible, or they'd allow recording during driving.  At the end of the day I'd imagine it comes down what 95% of decisions in all industries do, cutting cost = more profit.

Posted
11 hours ago, Bamacommander said:

Finally got into see the service department about the adaptive cruise malfunction. Had a video which showed that it was temporarily out of service. No surprise here, they could find nothing wrong after running a diagnosis on the system. I had it happen again after taking it in. It was around 8 am and I was heading east on the same highway, the sun was low in the horizon and right in front of me. I suspect that this was the cause of the problem. Seems like they could come up with better technology that would work better.

So this system uses a camera to detect a vehicle in the front. I know when I drive towards the sun I either have sunglasses on or the sun visor down or both. The camera doesn't have that option. The system errs on the side of caution and lets you know with a warning that it's turned off temporarily. I'd rather have it do that than run into something. Also how far away do you have the following distance set? I would bet that has a big difference on the system reaction time.

Posted

I set it at the maximum distance , which I was told is the three car length setting. Now that I understand it’s shortcomings , I’ll take it into consideration when using it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,677 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...