Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, AirForceAngler said:

We have 2 Rav4s with ACC and it works great in those.  Reading about the GM version makes me kinda glad I don't have it in my Silverado.

Don't misunderstand, it's still 100x better having it than not. On a scale of 1-10, the Outback was probably an 8-9. This is probably a 6-7. I wish supercruise had been a year earlier in these. 

 

Anyway, that is if I can ever get mine fixed......

Posted (edited)

What happened was there were 3 lanes of traffic heading east . The left lane had continuous traffic , I was in the middle lane and there were trucks in the right lane. A truck in the right lane came into the middle lane just in front of me to pass a slower truck. So the distance between my truck and his was very short. The adaptive cruise kept me at the same speed and didn’t slow me down then it shut off.  I took over from there, I was not on the phone or otherwise distracted . It was a very short distance and I was basically sandwiched  between the two lanes. I’m amazed at how many people responded trying to give a description of what happened when they weren’t even in the truck when this happened .  

Edited by Bamacommander
Correct typos
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I use the adaptive cruise most of the time. 

 

There are some traffic situations that I prefer regular cruise. 

Fortunately, on these trucks you can switch between the two versions anytime -- some vehicles only have one or the other.

 

Just like it has been in the days before ACC there are also some traffic situations that regular cruise isn't suitable either.

 

Fortunately, manual is still available.....

 

 

I find that when driving into a setting/rising sun the camera gets blinded and will disable the adaptive cruise. 

 

 

Only time I've had ACC aggressively brake and warn was when another vehicle cut into my lane way way to close to my bumper. 

I guess it would likely do the same if the truck was driven into another lane to close behind a vehicle already in that lane. I don't plan to test it. 

 

 

 

Edited by redwngr
  • Like 1
Posted

And GM is pushing Super Cruise? If they cannot even get that fixed, then I don't think I'd want that. The system malfunctioned, why is that so hard to understand? That's a safety issue here.

Posted

One thing I learned when I went from my 20' AT4 to my 21' is there's a lot of variation in how well these systems work truck to truck as well.   For example the auto high beams worked horribly on my 20' to the point I never used them after the first week, but work great on my 21'.   On my 20' in rain I'd frequently get the radar collision warning at stop lights, as if you were parking and going to hit something, has never happened in my 21'.   The adaptive cruise/lane detection is much better in my 21' than it was in my 20', my 21' has less issues with low sun/rain conditions.  On the other hand the traction control worked much better on wet roads on my 20'.

 

That said, I don't like using the adaptive cruise for the exact reason the OP listed in any sort of traffic, on roads with little to no traffic it's fine, and I'd never rely on it, especially for playing the game of coming to a complete stop.  It does not do a good job of keeping track of traffic unless it's in the lane ahead of you, on a straight road, in perfect conditions.  It also struggles to find the lane on worn roads, and if it can't find the lane it will shut adaptive cruise off.  I've also noticed that if someone cuts right in front of you, which happens all the time here, it tends to confuse the system.   The way idiots drive here in PA, they consider 2 car lengths more than enough room at 70 mph, these idiots think tailgating is a sport, so even on the shortest setting there's always someone speeding up and pulling in front of you (maybe this is why most of them drive in the left lane blocking traffic!).   Unless it's raining, the only place i've lived where people are more scared of wet roads in Vegas, and it rains more here than portland. 

 

Honestly I'm not very impressed with the collision alert system either.  I've had it threaten to lock the brakes up in situations that did not require it.   A couple times I've had it freak out on an empty road when there was a black repair patch going across a light colored concrete road.  It also freaks out if you are coming to a corner that doesn't require stopping and there's a car or person walking, for example driving through a park with a corner and walking path.  It can't figure out the road curves and freaks out.  I'm significantly more concerned the system is going to create an accident locking the brakes up when there's no need (and getting rammed from behind by the tailgaters) than it actually going to save me from an issue in front of me. 

Posted

I have a 2020 Silverado High Country, and I use Adaptive Cruise all the time and Love it!!!  BUT!!!

It is like all technology, it has its limitations. I have had mine disable in direct sunlight and pouring rain.

the worst condition is nearing  a red light in a 4 lane where the car in front of you moves over to the other lane.

even if there is a car in front of where that one was, the truck guns the accelerator to regain the cruising speed, right toward another car or an empty lane with a red light. Give me a software update so the Adaptive Cruise Camera can recognize red lights and stop signs! JK

 

all that said, I will continue to use the Adaptive Cruise. It works most of the time. the limitations are in the single camera and the software.

 

  • Like 1
Posted

i have had this happen twice to me only i was in traffic on interstate at 75 mph not closing on anyone just got the seat vibration message stating adaptive cruise control temporally unavailable.    Another time driving on interstate again highway speed no cars close and adaptive cruise temp unavailable with entire seat vibration.   Seems odd 

Posted

Not familiar with GMs version of the adaptive CC, but my wife's 4Runner has it and I hate it.  If the front camera (or whatever it is that detects the distance between your vehicle and the vehicle in front of you) is dirty, blocked, or obstructed another way, it will not allow the cruise control to be turned on and will give you a message on the DIC saying that the camera is dirty and needs to be cleaned or cleared and CC is unavailable.

Posted
On 9/17/2021 at 7:58 PM, Wiggums said:

And GM is pushing Super Cruise? If they cannot even get that fixed, then I don't think I'd want that. The system malfunctioned, why is that so hard to understand? That's a safety issue here.

*Allegedly*.  You weren't there, and neither were we. 

Posted
9 hours ago, dsr611 said:

Not familiar with GMs version of the adaptive CC, but my wife's 4Runner has it and I hate it.  If the front camera (or whatever it is that detects the distance between your vehicle and the vehicle in front of you) is dirty, blocked, or obstructed another way, it will not allow the cruise control to be turned on and will give you a message on the DIC saying that the camera is dirty and needs to be cleaned or cleared and CC is unavailable.

 

When the adaptive on these trucks becomes unavailable if the camera unable to 'see', the system can easily be switched to regular cruise using the cruise control buttons. 

 

 

 

Posted
On 9/16/2021 at 8:53 AM, Bamacommander said:

Are you guys nuts. I was able to avoid the truck because I was paying attention. It wasn’t a panic situation , but it was a close call. The adaptive cruise is supposed to be a safety feature . Right now mine is not . They have all these technology features so as to make the vehicle safer to drive. I wanted to alert others of a potential serious issue with regard to this matter, and see if anyone else has had any problems. Try to avoid speculating as to what I did or didn’t do because you weren’t in the truck with me when this happened and more then likely your getting it wrong . 

I’m surprised you had to slam on your brakes. In my wife’s Camry even in the closest setting you’re pretty far away when it starts to slow down. That being said yours didn’t but I’m surprised you didn’t pick up in that sooner so you weren’t slamming on the brakes. Sounds like your truck needs some work though. 

Posted
On 9/16/2021 at 9:53 AM, Bamacommander said:

Are you guys nuts. I was able to avoid the truck because I was paying attention. It wasn’t a panic situation , but it was a close call. The adaptive cruise is supposed to be a safety feature . Right now mine is not . They have all these technology features so as to make the vehicle safer to drive. I wanted to alert others of a potential serious issue with regard to this matter, and see if anyone else has had any problems. Try to avoid speculating as to what I did or didn’t do because you weren’t in the truck with me when this happened and more then likely your getting it wrong . 

I also had a similar issue.  Front brake assist or collision avoidance failed.  Vibration and red warning after fender bender at front passenger.   $6300 damage and GM denied my claim.   GM isn't standing behind their safety systems on a $65,000 truck 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,475 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
    • Do you have access to BP fuels? Some stations have Silver 91 E-0 priced the same as their 93 E-10.  There is a local Marathon with 90 alky free for $6 a gallon but I go down the road to BP for $5-ish. They also have a 100 E-0 but that stuff is $10 a pop. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...