Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think with all the issues that the screen is doing that the company should have a recall. I would say do not buy they are bad vehicles that seems like it does what it wants because of the apps, radio, calls.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 10/18/2021 at 4:51 PM, AngieM01 said:

I think with all the issues that the screen is doing that the company should have a recall. I would say do not buy they are bad vehicles that seems like it does what it wants because of the apps, radio, calls.

Have your XM antenna looked at for leaks.
It's an issue talked about here numerous times,
Just do a search.

Posted

Sorry for the issues you are having, but you shouldn't place them all in the bucket "they are bad vehicles". Design and workmanship are two different sides of the coin, I personally have never had any issue with any GM I've own with info screens, but most "issues" with electronics can mostly be traced to workmanship, poor connector assembly, bad or poor ground connection, or just damaged devises from weather, shipping or assembly. Ground connection are the most common issue since they are all over (and hidden most of the time) the vehicle. Normally a good technician (with the right info) can trace and fix those issues................just my 2 cents worth!

  • Like 1
Posted
On 10/18/2021 at 1:51 PM, AngieM01 said:

I think with all the issues that the screen is doing that the company should have a recall. I would say do not buy they are bad vehicles that seems like it does what it wants because of the apps, radio, calls.

Welcome to the site.

 

What would you suggest to all for buying/trusting a new/used vehicle? Do you plan on getting rid of your 2017? If so, what will you buy next?

  • Like 1
Posted
On 10/18/2021 at 3:51 PM, AngieM01 said:

I think with all the issues that the screen is doing that the company should have a recall. I would say do not buy they are bad vehicles that seems like it does what it wants because of the apps, radio, calls.

 

Here's the thing. Every brand has their fanboys and those that won't touch the brand with a 10 foot pole. Every brand, GM  Ford, Dodge  Toyota, etc... have multiple forums and you will see all kinds of problems and complaints in every one of them. That's kind of the idea to help owners address them. Very rarely do you see multiple posts about the many owners that have trouble free vehicles as not a lot would really care about that. But the reality is you will see probably just as many GM, Ford, Dodge, and other brands out on the road on any given day with owners that are happy with their choice so they can't all be bad. For the most it's just a matter of preference.

 

I have had Fords and Dodges before but just keep coming back to Chevy. I have had problems with each brand but overall have had the best luck with my Chevys. It's my personal preference. And not one of the brands I have had were setup perfectly. I have customized every one to address various short comings or to just make it the way I wanted. My most recent 2016 1500 has had a few issues but not any where near enough to make me walk away from the brand. It has done everything I have asked it to do. My biggest gripe so far is the fuel tank could be a little bigger. I know I could jump up to a 2500 or maybe even switch to Ford but this isn't a big enough reason to do it. 

 

Sorry for the rant... Bottom line, no brand is without their problems, you just have to decide what works best for you.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 hours ago, mikeyk101 said:

Sorry for the rant... Bottom line, no brand is without their problems, you just have to decide what works best for you.

@mikeyk101 , well said! :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
    • Thank you.   I am set on a 3.0 Duramax as my previous truck with a Ford Ecoboost had just as many, if not more, "common" issues.  Cam phasers, timing chain issues, 10-speed valve body and CDF drum, emissions issues, etc.  So I figured, why not get 2x the fuel mileage (these things got 27+mpg on every mixed city/highway test drive I put them through) and better towing capability with resale value to boot?   My minimum, shortest trip will be 50 miles 1-way and I regularly go out of state with a travel trailer.  I'm planning on using this for a marketing/event promotion business also, which would require regular towing of trailers for bands, DJs, sound and lighting gear, along with my personal camera gear for filming events.   Looked at other trucks in the $30k+ price range but the issues seem to be everywhere, plus too many with gaudy mods.  I'm literally sticking with RWD trucks because they tend to be actually used as trucks, vs. the 4x4 models I've seen with unsafe lifts, huge tires, and general mods that would affect reliability (I'm wondering if some of them were tuned, hence the aggressive throttle response and hard shifting).   So my goal is to find a stock, 3.0 with 1 or 2 owners, in good physical condition, and decently well maintained.  Can't seem to find that up here, everything in the $27-30k range has had multiple owners, smoke smell, issues, or body damage.  Or the ridiculously modified trucks with 80k miles for under $27k but lots of problems...
    • That’s pretty tough Grumpy. I reread the previous few posts. They all reference oil changes. Much like your last thread. In my humble opinion it keeps things interesting.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...