Jump to content

2021 5.3 GMC Sierra lifter failure

Paul Ternes
 Share

Recommended Posts

Paul Ternes Enthusiast

Paul Ternes

Posted
Posted

I just picked up my Sierra with 7100 miles from GMC service that was in for lifter, push rod replacement. I'm shocked they released the truck to me without replacing the engine oil.

Does this seem right to you? The service department also did not replace the fuel pipes below the intake manifold. I read somewhere the pipes are one-time use and must be replaced.

Does anyone know if and where GM specified replacing the fuel pipes?

Paul Ternes Enthusiast

Paul Ternes

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, shakenfake said:

I'm sure they replaced the engine oil. Never heard of replacing fuel pipes.

Rinke GMC in Centerline Michigan did not replace the oil. I just now had it changed at a local shop. Filter and oil dirty.

That's why I'm blown away by this!

diyer2 Senior Enthusiast

diyer2

Posted
Posted

I lived in Warren MI. Graduated from Lincoln High School. 

Nothing surprises me any more. The question is how many miles were are the oil? Was the oil dirty due to the mileage?

While I agree they could have changed the oil, if it isn't in the TSB for the work performed they won't do it because GM wouldn't pay them for it. 

voided3 Enthusiast

voided3

Posted
Posted

They didn't change the oil on ours during the lifter repair earlier this year, but they did replace the fuel pipe. Admittedly they had changed the oil 400 miles prior during the first repair attempt, though, but that was because they pulled the cylinder head the first time and they had to change it in order to avoid coolant contaminating the oil. All of this happened between 585 and 1700 miles, though, so it was pretty fresh to begin with.

 

Anecdotally, the lifter issue hasn't returned yet (operative word "yet"...) at roughly 11,500 miles, but I drive the truck in L7 to disable DFM and change the oil every 3,700-4,000 miles. Basically, I don't let the oil life percentage drop below 50%. We also negotiated in an extended component coverage on the engine to six years, 100,000 miles, since it took four dealer visits over 51 days to actually fix the issue as this was early 2021 prior to the updated TSB guidance. All of that said, I have no interest in owning this truck out of warranty due to the awful valvetrain and overall questionable build quality so it'll be gone before then.

  • Like 2
M1ck3y Senior Enthusiast

M1ck3y

Posted
Posted

The current ceo has killed gm. They might be making money but as far as I'm concerned gm is no longer the legend it used to be.

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Happy man Enthusiast

Happy man

Posted
Posted

Please educate me on what a "fuel pipe' is and includes that you are referring to and why it should be replaced on a lifter repair.  I am not a "motor head" is why I am asking.  I have a 2021 5.3L that has 5,100 on it so far.  It has been flawless so far but would like to be educated/prepared in case needed.

  • Like 1
Paul Ternes Enthusiast

Paul Ternes

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Disclaimer; I'm not a motorhead either. This is what I've learned after some homework. If anyone knows better, please enlighten me!

 

Under the intake manifold, there are 2 semi-rigid fuel pipes that need to be removed when servicing lifters on the 5.3

GM part #12677002 and #12679463. I did read somewhere that GM specifies 'single use' and these parts are not to be reused. I've looked at other dealer service invoices for lifter replacement and these pipes were replaced.

My Sierra build date is 12/20 and I've babied that truck like my first born child. 2 lifters collapsed simultaneously at freeway speed leaving the truck undriveable. I hope you escape this curse!!

Happy man Enthusiast

Happy man

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Paul Ternes said:

Disclaimer; I'm not a motorhead either. This is what I've learned after some homework. If anyone knows better, please enlighten me!

 

Under the intake manifold, there are 2 semi-rigid fuel pipes that need to be removed when servicing lifters on the 5.3

GM part #12677002 and #12679463. I did read somewhere that GM specifies 'single use' and these parts are not to be reused. I've looked at other dealer service invoices for lifter replacement and these pipes were replaced.

My Sierra build date is 12/20 and I've babied that truck like my first born child. 2 lifters collapsed simultaneously at freeway speed leaving the truck undriveable. I hope you escape this curse!!

Okay, thank you!  I will save this post.  I also have been doing all I can to help with the shortfalls i.e., Catch can, Filtermag, Lucas's oil treatment, turning off Auto Stop, no hot-rodding, frequent oil changes at first couple thousand miles.  It's kinda a ridiculous obsession, but it does run super quiet even with the hood up.  My Denali 5.3L was built in DA Mexico in February '21.  I am fairly sure none of my efforts will fix a bad lifter or lifter spring.  I do wish GM would send out a recall on this issue so I could have some peace of mind.   I travel on long trips with family.  If it leaves me stranded that will probably end my relationship with GM and I will return back to Toyota for good where I didn't have these worries.  I just liked the Denali offerings, so I thought I'd give it a try and then this carp I learned about.  It was all rainbows and unicorns at the dealership when purchasing...Ha.

dgstarr63 Enthusiast

dgstarr63

Posted
Posted

I feel the same way you do. I own a restored 1962 Impala SS that I would like to show at the Bowling Green Kentucky VCCA International Meet next August. I live in Oregon and would trailer my 62 using my 2021 Silverado 5.3 DFM truck. After spending $50K for the truck I refuse to take a chance on a lifter failure. I could be stranded anywhere between Oregon and Kentucky waiting for a backordered set of lifters. I would probably be put  in line behind the repairing dealers regular customers. I have owned 8 GM trucks since 1968 and this is the first one that I am afraid to travel with.

Paul Ternes Enthusiast

Paul Ternes

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 minutes ago, dgstarr63 said:

I feel the same way you do. I own a restored 1962 Impala SS that I would like to show at the Bowling Green Kentucky VCCA International Meet next August. I live in Oregon and would trailer my 62 using my 2021 Silverado 5.3 DFM truck. After spending $50K for the truck I refuse to take a chance on a lifter failure. I could be stranded anywhere between Oregon and Kentucky waiting for a backordered set of lifters. I would probably be put  in line behind the repairing dealers regular customers. I have owned 8 GM trucks since 1968 and this is the first one that I am afraid to travel with.

Your reading too much into this! Put your trailer on your truck and drive it. The chance of failure is really very low. I will say GM Roadside Assistance was excellent. They had a flatbed truck at my location within 15 minutes. A dealer loaner wasn't available but GM offered to pay for a rental. We agreed GM would pay for 90 day insurance policy on my summer car that was in storage so I had something to drive. I haven't seen that reimbursement yet. Haha

voided3 Enthusiast

voided3

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, dgstarr63 said:

I feel the same way you do. I own a restored 1962 Impala SS that I would like to show at the Bowling Green Kentucky VCCA International Meet next August. I live in Oregon and would trailer my 62 using my 2021 Silverado 5.3 DFM truck. After spending $50K for the truck I refuse to take a chance on a lifter failure. I could be stranded anywhere between Oregon and Kentucky waiting for a backordered set of lifters. I would probably be put  in line behind the repairing dealers regular customers. I have owned 8 GM trucks since 1968 and this is the first one that I am afraid to travel with.

On the upside, when you tow that much weight, you most likely will be in one of the "L" gear ranges which disables DFM and greatly reduces the likelihood of a failure. I tow a 4,000 lbs. camper with our '21 Silverado 5.3 8-speed in L6 with tow/haul engaged, for example.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined

  • Who's Online   4 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,856 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Chuck FB
      summer road trips in the 2026 2500HD

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Aimatdeer
      Ac not keeping up

      By Aimatdeer · Posted

      Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • CamGTP
      Gas Prices

      By CamGTP · Posted

      Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Atlas
      Gas Prices

      By Atlas · Posted

      Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...