Jump to content

How do you guys estimate Fuel Mileage?

Calboy
 Share

Recommended Posts

JimCost2014 Senior Enthusiast

JimCost2014

Posted
Posted

If I were getting 5 - 10 MPG, would still drive my truck.

 

As much as I use it as a truck, it is worth the extra expense at the pump, compared to putting a "load for the dump" in the backseat of an eco box because of fuel mileage.

 

Hmm, wonder if this post will get as heated as the catch can one just did😬🤔

  • Like 1
  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Silverado4x4
Silverado4x4

For the life of me I just can't understand why people want to sink hundreds of dollars to try and improve fuel mileage as the money you spend to try and pick up maybe 1-2 mpg will take you years and y

Transient
Transient

I don't.  If I was worried about mpg I would've bought the diesel engine. 

Transient
Transient

Kinda like people who pay $10k-$20k more for a hybrid instead of a gasser when it'll take years and years to pay for the money spent for the upgrade.  Fools and money are often departed.

shakenfake Senior Enthusiast

shakenfake

Posted
Posted

Haha anything involving

1. Oil

2. Fuel Mileage

3. GM Recalls or crappy engineering

 

Gets all the pensioners riled up. 🤣

 

I am 50/50 on that @JimCost2014I would save a little on gas commuting in another car if possible instead of put miles and what not on my truck. Then again I don't really use my truck like a truck that much. I just like the comfort and niceties it has over other vehicles.

swathdiver Senior Enthusiast

swathdiver

Posted
Posted
22 hours ago, Calboy said:

Hey Guys,

 

How do most of you decipher your gas mileage? I am looking at adding a couple of upgrades to see if my gas mileage improves. Are you using the truck feed back on the dash or going old school and calculating from a full tank to empty based on miles? If you are using the truck feedback how accurate do you feel it is?

I don't estimate it, I calculate it several different ways and average it out on a spreadsheet.

 

One of the biggest effects on fuel mileage is the fuel chosen.  There is a difference between brands and octane levels.  You measure to see which delivers the lowest cents per mile to operate.

 

I get my best gasoline mileage on Chevron's 93.  Even though it delivers the highest mpgs, it costs more per mile to burn it.

 

Tires are another large factor in fuel efficiency.  Both in design, condition and pressure and alignment.  An out of alignment truck if fighting itself to go down the road straight.  Grumpy taught me that.

 

Lubricants.  Engine oil, transmission and gear oils also have an effect on gas mileage.  I picked up a 1/4 mpg by switching from plain Mobil 1 5W30 to ACDelco's oil for my truck.  I also picked up a 1/4 mpg by using the drag reduction clips on my rear brakes alone.  Those rusted and lost their effectiveness after time though.  I have some new coated ones to put on at all four corners soon.

 

Having said all of that, mine has burned an average of 2.2 gallons per hour since 2017.  In 2020 my truck cost seventeen cents a mile to drive.  This year it has cost twenty four cents a mile to drive it. 

 

So you know what?  What has the biggest effect on fuel efficiency?  The kind of man in the White House does!  LOL

 

It costs us an extra $21 to drive 300 miles in 2021 compared with 2020.   

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, swathdiver said:

Tires are another large factor in fuel efficiency.  Both in design, condition and pressure and alignment. 

 

Yes this ^^^^^

  • Like 2
Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, JimCost2014 said:

Hmm, wonder if this post will get as heated as the catch can one just did😬🤔

 

Na...takes two and smart money quit playing 😉 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
JimCost2014 Senior Enthusiast

JimCost2014

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Na...takes two and smart money quit playing 😉 

Thinking maybe it just ended up 1 post over, Oil Pressure😮

  • Like 1
Transient Senior Enthusiast

Transient

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Na...takes two and smart money quit playing 😉 

Does that mean you're not smart money?

Edited by Transient
KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, JimCost2014 said:

If I were getting 5 - 10 MPG, would still drive my truck.

 

As much as I use it as a truck, it is worth the extra expense at the pump, compared to putting a "load for the dump" in the backseat of an eco box because of fuel mileage.

 

Hmm, wonder if this post will get as heated as the catch can one just did😬🤔

I probably put close to 2 million miles in the seat of a truck. My personal favorite is an avalanche. My wife drives a sport sedan. My preference for cruising across country would be a medium to full size car. You can get a well appointed car for the price of a work truck. And still buy a decent used truck to do truck stuff around the house with the savings. You get the benefit of a car and still have a truck. The benefits you may ask? Fuel savings, better handling, stability in bad weather and passing a semi. Ease of entering and exiting the interior. Back in the day people were pretty resourceful. They put a hitch on their sedan to pull their trailer to the dump, Home Depot and even their camper. The auto makers got smart a couple decades ago. Realizing the profits in a regular work truck after adding doors. They dressed them up a bit and advertise them as dual purpose and raked in the money. The next big sellers coming are the maverick and Santa cruise. They both are lowered about 5 inches and smaller. Basically sedans with beds. And priced about the same as mid sized sedans. 

swathdiver Senior Enthusiast

swathdiver

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, KARNUT said:

I probably put close to 2 million miles in the seat of a truck. My personal favorite is an avalanche. My wife drives a sport sedan. My preference for cruising across country would be a medium to full size car. You can get a well appointed car for the price of a work truck. And still buy a decent used truck to do truck stuff around the house with the savings. You get the benefit of a car and still have a truck. The benefits you may ask? Fuel savings, better handling, stability in bad weather and passing a semi. Ease of entering and exiting the interior. Back in the day people were pretty resourceful. They put a hitch on their sedan to pull their trailer to the dump, Home Depot and even their camper. The auto makers got smart a couple decades ago. Realizing the profits in a regular work truck after adding doors. They dressed them up a bit and advertise them as dual purpose and raked in the money. The next big sellers coming are the maverick and Santa cruise. They both are lowered about 5 inches and smaller. Basically sedans with beds. And priced about the same as mid sized sedans. 

Don't forget that the gubment basically legislated cars out of existence with all their laws and regulations.  

 

I'll never have a car again, unless for a toy.  My parents, brother and sister and I have all been seriously injured in accidents in cars.  Paying extra for gas is the price of safety.

Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, JimCost2014 said:

Thinking maybe it just ended up 1 post over, Oil Pressure😮

 

Not from my participation. My Ignore button works just fine. 🤫

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted
47 minutes ago, swathdiver said:

Don't forget that the gubment basically legislated cars out of existence with all their laws and regulations.  

 

I'll never have a car again, unless for a toy.  My parents, brother and sister and I have all been seriously injured in accidents in cars.  Paying extra for gas is the price of safety.

I take several trips across country yearly. It never fails during the trips I come across bad weather. During high winds and down pours high center vehicles are dancing all over, drivers chasing their vehicles. Or there’re pulled over. Cars no problem. I’ve been there done that. As far as crash safety it’s debatable.

  • Like 1
swathdiver Senior Enthusiast

swathdiver

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

I take several trips across country yearly. It never fails during the trips I come across bad weather. During high winds and down pours high center vehicles are dancing all over, drivers chasing their vehicles. Or there’re pulled over. Cars no problem. I’ve been there done that. As far as crash safety it’s debatable.

Before they changed their website, my 2009 GMC had zero fatalities on record with the IIHS and the others like it and yours are minimal as well.  Our little Kia on the other hand, it was the highest rated for deaths last time we looked!  

 

Curiously, I've had no issues in high winds or driving through tropical storms in the Yukon.  The right tires mitigate most of that.

  • Like 1
Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, swathdiver said:

Curiously, I've had no issues in high winds or driving through tropical storms in the Yukon.  

 

😱

  • Haha 1
KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, swathdiver said:

Before they changed their website, my 2009 GMC had zero fatalities on record with the IIHS and the others like it and yours are minimal as well.  Our little Kia on the other hand, it was the highest rated for deaths last time we looked!  

 

Curiously, I've had no issues in high winds or driving through tropical storms in the Yukon.  The right tires mitigate most of that.

It boils down to personal preference, I get it. As always we can work the stats to our preference. I’m a driver, not a rider. I’ve encountered all situations. I’ve been turned around in wind driven rain events in a 1/2 ton with BFGs my preferred tire. I saved it. A well balanced car would have been a wiggle. Trucks are bill boards with little weight in the back. I like my truck for local duties. If it’s windy or rainy, it stays home.

  • Like 1
aseibel Senior Enthusiast

aseibel

Posted
Posted
On 12/13/2021 at 3:34 PM, Calboy said:

I am looking at adding a couple of upgrades to see if my gas mileage improves. 

 

20 hours ago, swathdiver said:

Tires are another large factor in fuel efficiency.  Both in design, condition and pressure and alignment. 

 

The biggest thing you can do to help your fuel economy is to maintain the already highly tuned aerodynamics by NOT installing taller, wider, more aggressive tires. That is a common mod people do that only hurts your wind drag and rolling resistance. Put on some highway tires, maybe even skinnier than OEM. But nobody wants those on a truck. Any cheap bolt-on mod that claims to improve mileage is more likely to be snake oil. If I didn't like the sound my Airaid MIT tube makes I wouldn't have it installed. No noticeable difference in mileage.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Another JR
      Gasser Subforum Has Been Quiet - - So, Regenerative Braking and Using L10

      By Another JR · Posted

      Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • newdude
      Gas fill door

      By newdude · Posted

      Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • newdude
      Gasser Subforum Has Been Quiet - - So, Regenerative Braking and Using L10

      By newdude · Posted

      No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...