Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 1/4/2023 at 4:46 PM, Pryme said:

Truck takes 8qts so wouldn’t it be a half quart?

Yeah. I misquoted. I typically add up to a quart between oil changes. I change the oil and filter with 8.5Qts. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I've read through a lot of this long thread and am feel a lot of dread.  I have a 2020 GMC Sierra 2500 Denali.  The dealer put 6 quarts in the engine at 19,000 and I have since started burning oil.  First time I took it in they checked for leaks (found none) and gave it back saying come back in 1,000 miles.  Of course, once GM got involved, the dealer realized they did not conduct a proper oil consumption test.  I am in the middle of one now and can see a huge shift in 'cover you ***' type of documentation.  Likely because GM has contacted them about it.

 

Read the last order and you can smell the BS. 

  • First return to dealer it was barely on the dipstick.  Added 1.5 quarts (so they claim)
  • Second return is was not on the dipstick.  Added 1 quart.
  • Noted evidence of towing.  **NO STUFF!!  Who drives a 2500 for pleasure?  But I have not towed since early Fall, 1,000's of miles before the last oil change and consumption test.
  • They state on the order that 1 quart per 1,000 miles is acceptable.  Assuming an oil change at 5,000 miles, and I lose 62.5% of my oil??  From driving 60% highway / 40% city?

Note the order has a quantity of 2 for quarts of oil.  Why 2 if they only used 1?

 

I have had 4 Chevy and GMC pickups plus 7 other GM vehicles.  If nothing further is done, I likely need to sell this very expensive truck.  If I do, it will be my very last GM product ever.

 

 

 

20230527_113338.jpg

  • Sad 1
Posted
55 minutes ago, MachWun said:

I've read through a lot of this long thread and am feel a lot of dread.  I have a 2020 GMC Sierra 2500 Denali.  The dealer put 6 quarts in the engine at 19,000 and I have since started burning oil.  First time I took it in they checked for leaks (found none) and gave it back saying come back in 1,000 miles.  Of course, once GM got involved, the dealer realized they did not conduct a proper oil consumption test.  I am in the middle of one now and can see a huge shift in 'cover you ***' type of documentation.  Likely because GM has contacted them about it.

 

Read the last order and you can smell the BS. 

  • First return to dealer it was barely on the dipstick.  Added 1.5 quarts (so they claim)
  • Second return is was not on the dipstick.  Added 1 quart.
  • Noted evidence of towing.  **NO STUFF!!  Who drives a 2500 for pleasure?  But I have not towed since early Fall, 1,000's of miles before the last oil change and consumption test.
  • They state on the order that 1 quart per 1,000 miles is acceptable.  Assuming an oil change at 5,000 miles, and I lose 62.5% of my oil??  From driving 60% highway / 40% city?

Note the order has a quantity of 2 for quarts of oil.  Why 2 if they only used 1?

 

I have had 4 Chevy and GMC pickups plus 7 other GM vehicles.  If nothing further is done, I likely need to sell this very expensive truck.  If I do, it will be my very last GM product ever.

 

 

 

20230527_113338.jpg

Make sure you hang onto that evidence that they billed you for two quarts but said they only added one in the oil consumption check records. Their credibility will be damaged by that if you get to arbitration or a lemon law case. 

  • Like 2
  • 6 months later...
Posted
On 12/15/2021 at 8:50 AM, Truston Gunter said:

No visible leaks on the underbelly and driveway. 

 

On 12/15/2021 at 3:07 PM, unit said:

Seems like excessive oil use to me.  That might have been normal in an early 50's engine but not in any I've driven lately.  Doesn't mean that you'll get any satisfaction from the dealer but that's my take on it.  Some Ford 5.0 L engines have excessive oil use problems and Ford is fixing some of them.  I agree - have it documented while under warranty.

I have a 2020 Silverado 3500hd 6.6 gas as a wrecker and it does the same thing . Chevrolet has an issue with these motors . I’m not sure if it’s cause it’s the first generation new face Silverados or what but you change the oil and drive less than 1000 miles and all the oil is done 

Posted (edited)

This whole oil consumption topic is all over the place.  When I first started reading about it, the engines either used oil from day 1 or didn't.  It was pretty much black and white.  Now I'm seeing people with 30k plus miles saying it is happening to them.  It's a very concerning but somewhat confusing topic too because I also have read, and this includes myself, of engines that never use a drop.  From a curious stand point I'm wondering if using a 5W-40 HDEO oil would slow down the oil usage for those that are experiencing this problem.  If anyone out there that is having oil consumption problems and has tried this please respond back, or is going to try this in the near future.  I would very much like to hear some results of trying an HDEO in their engines.  I might actually go to a 5W-40 HDEO for my truck just for the heck of it.  It certainly can't hurt anything except for maybe a small % gas mileage loss due to parasitic drag.  I doubt anyone would actually notice a difference at all but the engine might in a positive way.

Edited by Jettech1
Posted

So far none with my truck about to turn 8k miles but my truck has been babied. Heck, if only pulled it up near redline one time passing on a two lane highway. I wonder if the ones using oil get driven hard? I’d imagine a wrecker sees a hard life. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, Pryme said:

So far none with my truck about to turn 8k miles but my truck has been babied. Heck, if only pulled it up near redline one time passing on a two lane highway. I wonder if the ones using oil get driven hard? I’d imagine a wrecker sees a hard life. 

I drive the piss out of mine.  Sees redline several times a day going back and forth to work.  When towing our camper my foot was to the floor when merging onto the highway, when passing on the highway my foot was to the floor as well.  My truck has seen redline more times than Biden got votes....No joke... 🤣

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Jettech1 said:

This whole oil consumption topic is all over the place.  When I first started reading about it, the engines either used oil from day 1 or didn't.  It was pretty much black and white.  Now I'm seeing people with 30k plus miles saying it is happening to them.  It's a very concerning but somewhat confusing topic too because I also have read, and this includes myself, of engines that never use a drop.  From a curious stand point I'm wondering if using a 5W-40 HDEO oil would slow down the oil usage for those that are experiencing this problem.  If anyone out there that is having oil consumption problems and has tried this please respond back, or is going to try this in the near future.  I would very much like to hear some results of trying an HDEO in their engines.  I might actually go to a 5W-40 HDEO for my truck just for the heck of it.  It certainly can't hurt anything except for maybe a small % gas mileage loss due to parasitic drag.  I doubt anyone would actually notice a difference at all but the engine might in a positive way.

I do wonder if a lot of the people claiming they've never used oil actually check, or of they have the dealer always change their oil and have just never heard anything about it. There is a common issue with the Toyota 5.7L 3UR-FE where not enough of the FIPG seals on the cam towers get applied at the factory and oil ends up leaking out. I had two different Tundras and both had the leak, but tons of people claim they "don't have" the issue, including two people I personally know with Tundras. However, they didn't actually know they didn't have the leak, they just didn't know they did (kind of the absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence thing). When I checked their trucks for them, they both had the leak. Anyway, my point is that people claiming they don't have oil consumption issues might partially be people really just saying they don't know if they have consumption issues.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Got another story for you @Pryme, I do love to tell stories lol.  Anyhow back in 81 my grandfather gave me his 71 chevy pickup.  The bed was rotted out as was a lot of it (salt from northern Maine) go figure.  It had the 350 V8 in it with a 2 barrel carb and 3 on the tree.  I had just got my license and beat the snot out of that truck.  He had babied it for the 10 years he had owned it.  It only had 70k on it if memory serves me correct.  Anyhow being 15 years old, had just got my license and now had a cool ass truck with a 350 V8 in it.  That engine didn't last 3 months before it started burning a ton of oil.  So my dad and I removed the engine and tore it down to rebuild it.  What we found, is that because it had been babied all of those years, that the top of the cylinder walls had the dreaded edge on them.  I had broken every compression ring on that engine and the oil rings were toast as well.  Lesson learned from me, make them see redline from day one and all will be fine....lol..

Edited by Jettech1
Posted
6 minutes ago, BuckWallace said:

I do wonder if a lot of the people claiming they've never used oil actually check, or of they have the dealer always change their oil and have just never heard anything about it. There is a common issue with the Toyota 5.7L 3UR-FE where not enough of the FIPG seals on the cam towers get applied at the factory and oil ends up leaking out. I had two different Tundras and both had the leak, but tons of people claim they "don't have" the issue, including two people I personally know with Tundras. However, they didn't actually know they didn't have the leak, they just didn't know they did (kind of the absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence thing). When I checked their trucks for them, they both had the leak. Anyway, my point is that people claiming they don't have oil consumption issues might partially be people really just saying they don't know if they have consumption issues.

I think that is plausible.  Actual knowledge these days about vehicles or anything going on with them is kind of rare from what I've seen and dealt with.

Posted

I'm on my second 6.6 gasser, both driven like @Jettech1's. Rode hard loaded and unloaded with zero consumption. Every oil change done by me and checked meticulously.

 

I do have a really close buddy who's brother drove a 2020 srw 3500 work truck gasser. His truck used oil so bad, chevy was going to do an overhaul. Problem with that truck was it pulled 16k+lbs between MN, Iowa, and WI daily. I have never seen a truck abused so bad and that was part of the reason I bought my 2021 gmc 2500 gasser.

  • Like 2
Posted

A buddy of mine has a 2020 Silverado 2500 with the L8T and said he used 2 qts of oil over about 8,000 miles, so I guess that's within GM's "normal" tolerances. He also tows a 37' bumper pull travel trailer with a loaded weight just under 10k lbs, so it works pretty hard.

Posted
9 minutes ago, BuckWallace said:

A buddy of mine has a 2020 Silverado 2500 with the L8T and said he used 2 qts of oil over about 8,000 miles, so I guess that's within GM's "normal" tolerances. He also tows a 37' bumper pull travel trailer with a loaded weight just under 10k lbs, so it works pretty hard.

It sounds like he doesn't change his oil very often.  Not judging of course.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Well one of our most reliable vehicles was sold yesterday. The first and only I gave for free to a grandkid. If they got skin in the game they take care of it. My wife bought new. Five years later my daughter got it to use. We got it back and gave it to our grandson after graduation. He did zero maintenance just oil changes. When the AC quit he drove his mother’s car rather than get it fixed. Instead he just bought a beater and sold the Elantra. 
    • I usually do as well or better than the sticker for mileage. Usually better going west than east. North then South. Wind makes a difference. I’m not usually a conspiracy theorist. But it did dawn on me I’m going by the vehicle calculation. Now that would be interesting.
    • https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/fuel-economy-stickers-don-t-tell-the-whole-story-aaa-data-reveals-why/ar-AA26ocHk?ocid=winp2fptaskbarhover&cvid=6a4122ea3dae47e5b8dfbed5d4fd3d55&cvpid=648f6b4fc2fa4eddb4c12893aeb957ed&ei=59
    • What’s missing in all this is patience and investment in the future. Buy a 170K starter home. Ten years later sell it invest in a more expensive home. Eventually you’ll have a 600K home and pay starter home payments. Buy a starter car. Maintain it well. Save the payments after it’s payed for then buy an expensive car if you desire. Buy a tumbler make your own coffee, pack your lunch. Cook your own dinner. Most importantly take care of your car.
    • People mislead themselves. Statistics are highly useful indicators.   Here's the tie-in to this thread. If an oil sample tests shows a wear indicator of 7 using cheaper ACDelco oil, and a wear indicator of 2 (lower = less wear) using a particular brand of Mobil oil, and wear has a linear relationship with engine lifespan, anyone could assume that Mobil is reducing wear by more than 50% (let's just say a 200% reduction for you red state people trying hard to do math) which leads to increasing engine life by 2x. Perhaps, in a vacuum, by itself, when dreamed by AI.   Yeah?! That's what the statistic is saying, isn't it?   No, it isn't. It didn't come out and say engine life is doubled. That's a very bad assumption, and a case of severe myopia by assuming something potentially untrue about the only data point in focus.   Average cost of a new car is 50k. You bet it is.   The median cost of a new car is more like 35k. Expensive cars are skewing the perception that "average" now means a $50k price of entry for a very average automobile. And that's not true. People who don't understand statistics twist the living heck out of them to mean all sorts of things they don't actually mean.   "Average" new car payment is $1000/month. Yep, it is. And in that number are all the $35k new car buyers who bring significant equity, and the $25k new car buyers who finance the car for a month just to get a rebate, and then pay it off. Know what isn't in that number? All the payments made by people who don't finance a car.   Picking one's own data point (don't have a car payment, never paid $50k for a new vehicle, my house cost $170k, I afforded a middle class lifestyle on $4.50/hr) is just a data point. Just like earning $25/hr in an area where the median home price is almost $1 Million is a data point. In fact, it's a lot of data points given that 80% of the US population lives in/around major cities. They're not idiots; the vast majority of them do it to make a living because that's where the big money is.   The highs have become higher, lows have become lower, and how your personal mileage varies is not truth for an entire country. At the same time you can't NOT acknowledge the data. While it doesn't paint YOUR personal picture, it certainly tints the reality that you also live in, as does your single data point.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...