Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Jettech1 said:

Now that's very interesting.  Sounds like hell for the driving but that is interesting that you only dropped 1% in oil life.

I dropped quite a bit more oil life percentage during the 9 day stay than I did during the 19 hour drive, due to much more frequent key on/off cycles.

We returned back home 2 weeks ago after about 2,600 miles total.  I'll have to get the current oil life percentage tomorrow, but I know for certain that I left our area with 45%.

 

You're right, that is a long drive, but by driving straight through there and back, we essentially had 2 more full days in the area for our vacation which was great, other than sitting around in a hotel room out on the road with nothing to do except sleep.

 

I should also mention that we departed on a Friday evening at 6:00 PM after I was up all day since morning, which wasn't ideal.  The return trip was a lot better by waking up at 4:00 AM and hitting the road 5:00 AM after being fully refreshed after a full night's rest.

Edited by BlaineBug
  • Like 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, BlaineBug said:

I took a 1,150 mile road trip earlier this month, driving 19 hours straight only turning the motor off for fuel ups, rest stops, and a 2 hour nap.  Oil life indicator only lost 1% during that whole time from 45% to 44%.

But did you actually check the oil? That would be more telling.

Posted
1 minute ago, Pryme said:

But did you actually check the oil? That would be more telling.

Full before and after on the stick.  About 56,000 miles on the truck.

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)
On 2/20/2023 at 7:05 PM, Jettech1 said:

Now that's very interesting.  Sounds like hell for the driving but that is interesting that you only dropped 1% in oil life.

Current percentage is 33%.  So at nearly 3,000 miles of driving the oil life remaining percentage only dropped 2%.  I'd also wager it was less than 2% as it was likely at 35% for awhile before we left on our round trip road trip.

Edited by BlaineBug
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I just noticed - today's oil life percentage was 32%.  And I started this thread at 45%, in which it only decreased by 2% to 43% after a 2,600-2,700 mile trip.  But now it's at 32%.  So it seems if you drive the truck continually, it will drop slower than if you take short trips around town.  It's definitely not based on time alone or mileage alone.  I wonder what the actual formula is?

Edited by BlaineBug
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, BlaineBug said:

I just noticed - today's oil life percentage was 32%.  And I started this thread at 45%, in which it only decreased by 2% to 43% after a 2,600-2,700 mile trip.  But now it's at 32%.  So it seems if you drive the truck continually, it will drop slower than if you take short trips around town.  It's definitely not based on time alone or mileage alone.  I wonder what the actual formula is?

That kind of makes sense.  The algorithm used must take into account long trips, short trips, stop and go, etc. etc.  So yeah, that makes sense to me.  Wouldn't it be nice if they had an actual sensor monitoring the oil quality?  Contaminants, etc etc.... That would be so cool and probably save a ton of oil if the computer knew exactly how your oil is doing.  Not an algorithm, a true test of the oil.  Now that would be very cool!!! But that might put a few oil companies out of business with less demand for their products....And we can't have that can we....lol

Edited by Jettech1
Posted
37 minutes ago, Jettech1 said:

That kind of makes sense.  The algorithm used must take into account long trips, short trips, stop and go, etc. etc.  So yeah, that makes sense to me.  Wouldn't it be nice if they had an actual sensor monitoring the oil quality?  Contaminants, etc etc.... That would be so cool and probably save a ton of oil if the computer knew exactly how your oil is doing.  Not an algorithm, a true test of the oil.  Now that would be very cool!!! But that might put a few oil companies out of business with less demand for their products....And we can't have that can we....lol

 

Now that would be complicated.  A Blackstone Laboratory in every engine, conducting an oil analysis every 0.826 seconds!

  • Haha 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, BlaineBug said:

 

Now that would be complicated.  A Blackstone Laboratory in every engine, conducting an oil analysis every 0.826 seconds!

Bklabs doesn't even use FTIR and that technology is what you need to do exactly what you boys are thinking about. Its possible but IR, near IR, or Ramen sensors are not durable enough/cheap enough to stand the heat yet.  Trust me I worked on it for 30 years.  

 

GM Dr's Don Smolenski and Shirely Schwartz developed a bunch of different models for GM and after testing Chemical Reactor model, Volume effects, Average oil life, Chemical Kinetics, Oil Film Surface Area vs # of Combustion events, Severity of Service models.......  They settled on Severity of Service ( DSC generated OXIDATION temp curves) adjusted for Volume and Combustion events model. That backed up by Engine Servicing model so its on a end stage timer to save their bacon if the mathematical algorthim goes too far.  Direct sensing of temps has been added in recent years to tighten up the mathmatical model.  THE BOTTOM LINE IS WE HAVE A GOOD GUESS with these models but its not direct sensing

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

So I had an idea concerning oil monitoring.  Why is that so much of a stretch for technology these days?  We have cars that drive themselves...Seems to me the money and technology for something like that is way higher than an oil monitoring sensor.  I mean why not?  If you could get say 15 or even 20k miles out of your oil with a sensor knowing when it's going bad or has too much iron or whatever else in it....wouldn't that save a ton of money and oil usage?  Why isn't that possible in the days we are living in.  Hell I have a phone that knows exactly what I'm saying and knows exactly where I am at all times.  The technology has to be there...and I think it would be super cool if our vehicles would tell us that.

Posted
Just now, Jettech1 said:

So I had an idea concerning oil monitoring.  Why is that so much of a stretch for technology these days?  We have cars that drive themselves...Seems to me the money and technology for something like that is way higher than an oil monitoring sensor.  I mean why not?  If you could get say 15 or even 20k miles out of your oil with a sensor knowing when it's going bad or has too much iron or whatever else in it....wouldn't that save a ton of money and oil usage?  Why isn't that possible in the days we are living in.  Hell I have a phone that knows exactly what I'm saying and knows exactly where I am at all times.  The technology has to be there...and I think it would be super cool if our vehicles would tell us that.

"They" want to create machines with no oil at all, so, they don't care about that.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, BlaineBug said:

"They" want to create machines with no oil at all, so, they don't care about that.

And that is a very valid point!

 

Posted
8 hours ago, Jettech1 said:

So I had an idea concerning oil monitoring.  Why is that so much of a stretch for technology these days?  We have cars that drive themselves...Seems to me the money and technology for something like that is way higher than an oil monitoring sensor.  I mean why not?  If you could get say 15 or even 20k miles out of your oil with a sensor knowing when it's going bad or has too much iron or whatever else in it....wouldn't that save a ton of money and oil usage?  Why isn't that possible in the days we are living in.  Hell I have a phone that knows exactly what I'm saying and knows exactly where I am at all times.  The technology has to be there...and I think it would be super cool if our vehicles would tell us that.

It’s been done manually. Amsoil oils has advertised extended for decades. I’ve seen them used in hundreds of vehicles and equipment. We’ve had remote filters we could pull oil out for testing. My brother went 50K miles on Amsoil in his 95 Big Daddy dodge truck. My 94 Z-28 Camaro had 5 oil changes in 130K miles. I can give more examples you get the idea. Here’s the rub. Engines have changed. If you’re constantly cruising the highway you can go father with oil than in town driving. As far as automobiles sensors that’s already done. It’s assuming you’re using the correct clean oil and senses your driving tells you when to change. As much experience I’ve had with extended and with no issues I don’t do it anymore. Not to that extreme. Definitely not with transmissions. Oil is cheap engines aren’t. Follow the extreme service schedule. You’ll be covered. I think you know that and you’re spit balling. It just isn’t worth it for most people. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • There's some truth to the above, but also, she's selling fullsize trucks and bread/butter CUV's like hotcakes, meanwhile, extracting GM's pickups from the deep discounting sales game.   GM's stock has held its own during her tenure, and the more recent buybacks are delivering cash back to investors and signal confidence in their direction forward. Even with the EV losses.   GM is an example of a modern publicly traded company. The #1 goal of any publicly traded company is to deliver the most value possible to shareholders. Despite being a car company, building the best car isn't GM's path to delivering maximum shareholder value.   McDonalds doesn't make the best burger, or the best coffee.   I've mentioned in another thread, I really don't / won't ever understand Cadillac or Buick in a modern context. Both brands are completely dead to me. I'll cede that the Escalade is a nice SUV, but the brand and nameplate mean nothing to me, and GM will never persuade me to pay north of $170k for a gussied-up Tahoe or Burb. Other people don't mind doing that and that's their purview.   The C8 shares absolutely nothing in common with any other current Chevrolet or Corvette on the market. Since its introduction 8 years ago, it's developed quite the following. It did what other Corvettes couldn't do: reduce the average age of its buyer. GM has something there, and I see them investing in the car. They'd better not mess that up.   We've successfully derailed Grumpy's thread again, but I think this one is meant to be more of a random thought thread so a little wandering is probably OK.
    • Sliding doors ftw   Also, Sienna ftw as well.  The in-laws got a 2024-2025 recently when their 2019 sienna was totaled due to a deer back in June.  They've been getting 38-40mpg on the 65mph highway they live on.
    • Forgot to mention that this started after changing the oil I use mobile 1 full syn with mobile one filter but I did add pro lube additive and was the first time doing so and is making me wonder just can't see why that would matter
    • I apologize for long post put going to try to explain everything. Parts replaced so far: Cam sensor Crank sensor Cam phaser valve Cam phaser solenoid Fuel pump Maf 1 injector Pcm Pdm   So about 2 weeks ago coming off the highway my 2007 yukon xl with the 6.2 stalled and would restart. Had unit towed back to house and I messed around with relays and unit started. Drove it the next day and same thing. Had it towed again. Scanned unit and had code p0300 with misfire data showing mainly cylinder 7 but I know that won't cause a no start. Measure fuel pressure and found only 42 psi replaced pump to have unit stall again and not restart. This time I stayed on back roads and just waited for it to restart about 30 to 60 min. During this time I found I have no injector pulse but have good power at injectors. Started unplugging 1 injector at a time and found when unplugging cylinder 7 pulse came back so i changed injecto and same issue. Turns out unit just happen to ready to start at that time. Scanned into unit and found no reason for the pcm to take away injector pulse so I replaced the pcm and same issue. I figured timing sesnor controlled the injector pulse so I replaced both sensors and while I had the water pump of i replaced the vvt components while i was in there. Read multiple people have luck chaging the maf for this issue so I changed it. Unit still stalls to this day and loses injector pulse on the ground side when it does. Have noticed watching the live data the pcm is request injectors to fire via injector pwm value. I have redone the ground wires at the left bottom of the block knowing this was the ground location for the pcm but still no luck. I am a mechanic by trade but this is having me pull my hair out. If anyone has something to have me check I will gladly im not much of a parts thrower but im about to load the cannon
    • Actually.  Wait.   I just re-read your original post.  Are you talking from INSIDE the truck you have to hit unlock?  Or from the key fob?  I had assumed from the key fob.   IF you are talking the inside unlock button, I assume you are shifting to park and its not unlocking the doors?  If so, that is changed via the settings page in the radio.  Go to SETTINGS, then VEHICLE and then it should be under LOCKS or DOOR LOCKS or something like that.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...