Jump to content

Looking for rear shocks that help with towing.

Jeff Bryer
 Share

Recommended Posts

Jeff Bryer New Member

Jeff Bryer

Posted
Posted

I used Monroe Shocks & Struts Load Adjusting 58654 Shock Absorber on a 2015 GMC not sure if same part number. Anyway looking online one article states these will work. But when search online they say they won't, not sure if they will fit. Like how they help with sag and add a extra inch to back height. Looking to find out of these will fit or another brand that made for help in towing/sag and possibly add a inch to rear height 

CamGTP Senior Enthusiast

CamGTP

Posted
Posted

Helper bags is all I ever suggest to people, they work so much better for heavy towing.

Jeff Bryer New Member

Jeff Bryer

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Understand but was really hoping to not go airbag. The load Adjusting shocks worked great on my 2015 GMC. Raised the back end up about 1 inch and much less sag truck stayed pretty level and handle well. I tow 4000 lbs 90% time and 7000lbs about 4 or 5 times a year.

AJMBLAZER Enthusiast

AJMBLAZER

Posted
Posted

The shock mounts aren't made for supposrting weight.

 

If you want more height use a block, add a leaf, or spring pack.  If you want more load stability use a bag setup or something like Timbrens or SumoSprings.

Ls1meyer New Member

Ls1meyer

Posted
Posted

I had 2 Air Lift bags with a compressor installed on my ‘21 Silverado. It came with a remote fob to adjust the air pressure. I tow a 32 ft RV and an open air car trailer. I love the system. It’s there when I need or just along for the ride when I don’t. $1500 installed which I didn’t think was too bad for the assurance I get. They really took care of any trailer away I had before the bags where installed. 

GMCSierra99 Enthusiast

GMCSierra99

Posted
Posted (edited)

I am using SuperSprings. They are like adding a leaf spring. They lift the rear end up and help with body roll. I tow about 8,000 lbs. all summer and winter. So far I am liking them. I did not notice any negative ride quality while not towing. 

Edited by GMCSierra99
dgstarr63 Enthusiast

dgstarr63

Posted
Posted

If your tongue weight is so much that you get sagging in the rear, you need a load equalizing hitch such as an Easy-Lift. Your owners manual should give you your tongue weight limit.

  • 5 weeks later...
Jerry Walleston Enthusiast

Jerry Walleston

Posted
Posted
On 3/24/2022 at 12:53 PM, dgstarr63 said:

If your tongue weight is so much that you get sagging in the rear, you need a load equalizing hitch such as an Easy-Lift. Your owners manual should give you your tongue weight limit.


I've got an Equalizer hitch and only towing 4000 lbs and 350lb tongue weight and my back end sags. I have the tow package, and off road package . No adjustment on the hitch has been able to reduce it. 

Gangly Senior Enthusiast

Gangly

Posted
Posted

For squat I would go with a Deaver leaf spring pack.  Airbags are another option if its in your budget.  If you want to change the shocks, Eibach and Bilstein are your two best options.

  • 1 year later...
TrailBossMike Enthusiast

TrailBossMike

Posted
Posted

Are you referring to porpoising?  Yes, firmer shocks will help with that.  Last truck, an '18, had Eibach Pro Truck Sport shocks installed in the rear.  Huge difference!  Not to expensive.  There's probably better but they simply worked.  New truck, a '23, is bouncing all over the place.  We're on a camping trip right now but I'm replacing the OEM Ranchos as soon as we get home.

Are you using a weight distribution hitch?  Some 'bounce' more than others 

Sbowmanok New Member

Sbowmanok

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, TrailBossMike said:

Are you referring to porpoising?  Yes, firmer shocks will help with that.  Last truck, an '18, had Eibach Pro Truck Sport shocks installed in the rear.  Huge difference!  Not to expensive.  There's probably better but they simply worked.  New truck, a '23, is bouncing all over the place.  We're on a camping trip right now but I'm replacing the OEM Ranchos as soon as we get home.

Are you using a weight distribution hitch?  Some 'bounce' more than others 

Yes, I am using an 'Equilizer' brand hitch. Formally pulled the trailer with a '19 RAM 1500 and did not have this issue, traded truck because it didn't have enough horses for this trailer. This Sierra 4x4 at stock height was 'porpoising' on it's maiden pull, would like to get this corrected, looking for recommendations. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      I went to the county a few years back to dispute my property taxes. To do that I hired an appraiser and a lawyer. The County Assessor wished to argue that the homes in my neighborhood the appraiser used were all 'distressed properties" and not representative of the "Market Average".    My response was," Of the 50 homes in our subdivision 43 of them were "distressed properties" under bank foreclosure and as such "Distressed IS the market". Lawyer about choked on his coffee and handed the Assessor the 'receipts'.    I won that case on the evidence provided by the Lawyer and the Appraiser.    We have the same thing going on here. My statements were based on the GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL DATA and yours on local markets in areas of your interest. They are both correct....   Thing is, this divergence was based on NATIONAL and not on LOCAL. I think you even understand that. But like you said, we are both stubborn and hardheaded.    I do not see any advantage to disengagement.  But that said we can step back to compose ourselves. 
    • revmanii
      Looking at ordering a '26 WT because I want a std cab, std bed

      By revmanii · Posted

      Trust me I appreciate the comments and concerns. It's what I was looking for to help me evaluate the situation and what I want to do. I have decided to move forward with the BORA hubcentric slip on 3/8" (.375") with the extended lugs nuts. Fedex says they should be here Monday :). Meanwhile, the dealer got the remote start and Patriot spray in bed liner done over the last couple of days. Also, I installed an inline stop/start eliminator today. Starts back up in what whatever mode you shut it off in, so you don't have to hit the button every time you fire up.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Gas Prices

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      $2.20 E-85 down from $2.59 Around $3.80 for regular and about $5 on average for Premium.  Propane $3.99 a gallon. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...