Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Good morning so I just purchased a 2022 worktruck single cab with the 2.7 high output motor im impressed with this motor has anyone did any mods to this motor yet ?

If so what improvements did you see ? 

Thanks  

  • Like 1
Posted

They're isn't much for mods on those trucks. I thought someone made an intake for them just for sound but no tuning software is out yet the last time I checked.

 

Not sure why Anon is downplaying 4 cylinder engines, it's pretty impressive for something with 2.7 Liters to make well over 300 horsepower and torque. And the new updated 2.7 makes over 400 ft lbs.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 3/24/2022 at 10:21 AM, Anon12345 said:

And so it begins.... Those trying to get more from a 4 banger and we start hearing and seeing the fart can rice rocket american trucks making a sh*t ton of noise but the speedometer barely moves, like hondas and toyotas and subarus....

Dude its just as quick as the 5.3. Quit being a 1983 redneck. 

  • Haha 4
Posted
On 3/24/2022 at 8:00 AM, Fubar12 said:

Good morning so I just purchased a 2022 worktruck single cab with the 2.7 high output motor im impressed with this motor has anyone did any mods to this motor yet ?

If so what improvements did you see ? 

Thanks  

I have the K&N cold air intake on mine. It makes the engine sound a little better and you can hear the turbo/sucking more. I don’t care what anyone says, throttle response is better and there’s more pull on the higher end. It’s worth it. You don’t need a tune to see benefits. 

  • Sad 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Anon12345 said:

Lmao, how about you stop being a pot head liberal?

Huh?  I don’t smoke pot or vote democrat. I’m just not ignorant to the fact that 4cyl and 6cyl can be just as quick or quicker than a V8 in a pickup truck. Quit crying about it. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Anon12345 said:

Lmao, how about you stop being a pot head liberal?

Oh and the fact that the 2.7 makes the Silverado/Sierra handle like a sports car compared to one with the 6.2. You don’t realize how much that front end weight makes the truck a sloppy pig. 
 

(I love the 6.2 but facts are facts)

  • Thanks 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Anon12345 said:

Its a TRUCK, not a CAR, so why is "handling like a sports car" a concern in a TRUCK?

 

4 bangers dont belong in full size trucks. 

 

Go back to buying your imports with the 4 bangers. Making a ****** ton of noise while producing 50 horsepower, must be a 4 banger. 

It’s called modification. I had a few lowered trucks they handled very well. It’s not a one size fits all. I can see a lowered 2 door slightly modified 4 banger being a blast to drive. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Anon12345 said:

Its a TRUCK, not a CAR, so why is "handling like a sports car" a concern in a TRUCK?

 

4 bangers dont belong in full size trucks. 

 

Go back to buying your imports with the 4 bangers. Making a ****** ton of noise while producing 50 horsepower, must be a 4 banger. 

I’m a V8, but I can also appreciate the new 2.7L 4 cylinder.  
 

I can bet you any amount of money that if I got 2 Chevy trucks. One with a 5.3L and one with a 2.7L. I make you wear earplugs to not hear the engine and you’d drive both.  I can almost bet you couldn’t tell the difference and your perspective on the so called “4-banger” would change.  Have an open mindset when it comes to things likes this.  Hell don’t you remember the GMC Syclone or Typhoon.  Those V6s were fast enough to take down Ferrari’s in the early 90s.  Let that sink in for a minute. 
 

I can’t wait for the 2.7L to be in the Colorado and Canyon.  Those trucks are going to “scoot”. 

Edited by TNTSilverado
  • Like 2
Posted
13 minutes ago, TNTSilverado said:

I’m a V8, but I can also appreciate the new 2.7L 4 cylinder.  
 

I can bet you any amount of money that if I got 2 Chevy trucks. One with a 5.3L and one with a 2.7L. I make you wear earplugs to not here the engine and you’d drive both.  I can almost bet you couldn’t tell the difference and your perspective on the so called “4-banger” would change.  Have an open mindset when it comes to things likes this.  Hell don’t you remember the GMC Syclone or Typhoon.  Those V6s were fast enough to take down Ferrari’s in the early 90s.  Let that sink in for a minute. 
 

I can’t wait for the 2.7L to be in the Colorado and Canyon.  Those truck are going to “scoot”. 

I drove the 2.7 4 banger. I dont like it. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Anon12345 said:

Its a TRUCK, not a CAR, so why is "handling like a sports car" a concern in a TRUCK?

 

4 bangers dont belong in full size trucks. 

 

Go back to buying your imports with the 4 bangers. Making a ****** ton of noise while producing 50 horsepower, must be a 4 banger. 

By comparison you hillbilly. 4 cyl has no place in a truck?  That’s like saying the Ford GT sucks because it has a 6 cyl. 50 HP?  Again, more torque than the 5.3 now. Get your head out of your ass you unvaccinated inbred mongoloid. You didn’t like it when you test drove it because you’re stuck in 1972. If you out war plugs in, you wouldn’t tell the difference between it and the 5.3. 
 

I think the 5.3 and 6.2 are awesome and I miss the V8 sound but it fires me up that people are so damn closed minded. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Mike Borowski said:

By comparison you hillbilly. 4 cyl has no place in a truck?  That’s like saying the Ford GT sucks because it has a 6 cyl. 50 HP?  Again, more torque than the 5.3 now. Get your head out of your ass you unvaccinated inbred mongoloid. You didn’t like it when you test drove it because you’re stuck in 1972. If you out war plugs in, you wouldn’t tell the difference between it and the 5.3. 
 

I think the 5.3 and 6.2 are awesome and I miss the V8 sound but it fires me up that people are so damn closed minded. 

"Closed minded" lmao. No. I dont base things off paper specs. Paper specs on google told you the numbers you wanted to see for a boosted 4 banger. So you get jittery and excited with your paper specs, instead of basing it off of real life. You are just a dumbass liberal regardless of how you claim to vote. Your opinions and the way you talk says otherwise. Hillbilly? No. Far from it. Just not mentally ill like you. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Anon12345 said:

"Closed minded" lmao. No. I dont base things off paper specs. Paper specs on google told you the numbers you wanted to see for a boosted 4 banger. So you get jittery and excited with your paper specs, instead of basing it off of real life. You are just a dumbass liberal regardless of how you claim to vote. Your opinions and the way you talk says otherwise. Hillbilly? No. Far from it. Just not mentally ill like you. 

What in the actual hell are you talking about??? Paper specs?  Those ARE the specs!  I’m done with this, there’s something clearly wrong with you. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 3/27/2022 at 1:27 PM, Anon12345 said:

I drove the 2.7 4 banger. I dont like it. 

Have your driven the High output 2.7 ?? 

Its a world of difference 

 

Posted

So back to the OP…… is there any mods for the single cab people have done?????

 

im looking for more creature comforts and interior as well

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The whole story is false. The screw is there as a temporary fix to allow the pump to even turn on. When the nozzle is returned the pump shuts off.. At this point people are just being punked   https://youtu.be/1DtlaEuHXAA?si=06mrRmw9HLUwdeRk   https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1CyRZdsaSc/ https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1DxV1Hyrqi/       SNOPES: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19HPYUnRik/
    • Follows the motif on the Sierra EV.  Satin finsh to the lower bumper area, painted above:   Elevation       Denali      
    • Not exactly what I was hoping for, but I do like it. I wonder if they'll bring back Smokey Quartz Metallic? 🤔 https://gmauthority.com/blog/2026/06/here-is-the-all-new-2027-gmc-sierra-1500/
    • Whoever greenlighted the work truck matte black front bumpers on every trim but the AT4X should be fired!  I was hoping that was an AI mistake, but just realized they were on every model of the 2027 Silverado too.     Some parts of the interior do look premium, but the Denali Ultimate dashboard looks like an afterthought.  At least they appear to have lost the microfiber the high end Silverado models showed, but the '27 High Country dash looks better than the Denali.  
    • New member here. I am researching a read-first event-recorder concept for late-model GM V8 trucks. This is not a sales post. There is no product link, price, preorder, or mailing list. I am trying to determine whether the underlying problem is real before building anything.   Has your truck ever had a brief problem such as: - rough running or a momentary misfire - an oil-pressure warning or unusual pressure event - reduced power or a brief stall - a U-code or lost-communication problem - a symptom that disappeared before the dealer or independent shop could reproduce it   If so, I would appreciate the following details: - year, model, engine, and mileage - what happened and under what conditions - whether a DTC and useful freeze-frame data were stored - whether the shop was able to reproduce it - what the eventual confirmed repair was, if known - what additional information would have helped the diagnosis   The concept being evaluated is a removable leave-in recorder that continuously retains a rolling window from before and after an event. It would not tune, reflash, clear codes, or change the vehicle calibration.   I am also not claiming that it could predict lifter failure or see every internal ECM variable.   The real question is whether continuous event history would add enough useful evidence beyond freeze frame, GDS2, and existing scan tools — or whether it would simply be another unnecessary gadget.   For owners and technicians, which problem would make something like this genuinely useful: 1. intermittent misfire or AFM/DFM-related behavior 2. oil-pressure events 3. lost communication or electrical faults 4. none of the above Please be blunt. Negative feedback is just as useful as positive feedback.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...