Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

sounds to me GM has it fine tuned it to operate with in a tight performance window eceptionally well,  i have no idea what a 3 valve electronic water pump/thermostatic system is, got any photos?

i have my doubts about any aftermarket improvements or ability to tune it.. 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

https://www.tuneautos.com/engines/gm-2.7l-l3b-turbo-engine

 

"GM's active thermal management cooling system is another unique characteristic of this new engine. A 3-way rotary valve and an ECM-controlled electric water pump make up this system. The passenger compartment is heated by an electric water pump, which also cools the engine and gearbox.

Posted (edited)

if the exhaust is super hot on 87 it must be very late timing, might not be something I want to use for offroading in a Colorado then, curious what the ZR2 with have in it. might be better off with the big 6

 

i'm probably better off building a 4x4 trailblazer instead 

Edited by pokismoki
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, pokismoki said:

if the exhaust is super hot on 87 it must be very late timing, might not be something I want to use for offroading in a Colorado then, curious what the ZR2 with have in it. might be better off with the big 6

Yes Sir understood, for clarification the exit at back of truck exhaust pipe is super hot on every octane including 93 E0 I tested in Texas from CENEX and it still showed soot but CENEX has always showed lower soot in tailpipe than other brands of fuel. I get E15 here from Maverik made by Phillips 66. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, pokismoki said:

GM made an impressive and extremely complicated product.  lease it, enjoy it, then trash it. be curious how it holds up past 8 years 

 

 

Being disabled and retired I'll let you know! I did buy a third party extended warranty for 84 months or 75,000 miles and its our only vehicle and I am not a good electronics tech.  

 

 

Posted
On 9/28/2022 at 4:08 PM, customboss said:

Was researching a bit and the 70 Nova fitted 396 had less TQ than the 2022 HO 2.7 Turbo!   Nova = 375HP 415 Ft lbs TQ @3600 rpm 

L3B HO = 310HP 430 ft lbs TQ @ 3000 rpm 

166 cubic inches vs 396 cubic inches outputs 50 years apart 😉

 

396 is 2 1/4 times more displacement and 1 3/4 times more weight. 

 

Need a lot of steel to go around all them cylinders, if 396 was iron heads a 650 lb motor vs about 375 lb motor as well.

 

Boost, aluminum, computers and other technology...a lot has happened in the past 50 years.

  • Like 1
Posted

Understood and interesting point about weight differential.  The latest GM 4.3 V6 weght is unknown to me but GM adverts that the L3B is 80lbs less than that. 

 

Trust me that last 50 years was hard on me too.....LOL  

 

 

Posted

I just found a reference that the L3B weighs 250 lbs!  Dang some of you studs out there could lift it out by hand......LOL  

 

https://dustrunnersauto.com/gm-2-7-l3b-turbo-everything-you-need-to-know/

Engine Specifications and Design:

  • Production Run: 2018 – Present
  • Cylinder Head Material: Aluminum
  • Cylinder Block Material: Aluminum
  • Configuration: Inline-4
  • Bore: 92.25 mm
  • Stroke: 102.0 mm
  • Valvetrain: DOHC with four valves per cylinder with VVT and VVL
  • Displacement: 2.7 L (2727 cc)
  • Compression Ratio: 10.0
  • Weight: 250 lbs. 
  • Maximum HP: 325 HP at 5,600 RPM
  • Maximum Torque: 380 lb-ft at 4,000 RPM
Posted (edited)
On 9/28/2022 at 11:45 PM, pokismoki said:

anyone try the 2.7 HO in the colorado yet?

 

 

Media hasn't driven yet, production doesn't start till beginning of 2023.  

 

It might be close to the Silverado with the HO in terms of performance when it comes to the Turbo Plus and the HO in the Colorado. 

 

GM has the WT and LT at 4716lbs curb weight, Trail Boss and Z71 at 4971lbs and ZR2 at 5298lbs.  For comparison my LT HO crew cab short box on the door sticker is 5049lbs.  

 

A WT or LT with the Turbo Plus (390tq) would likely be faster than my truck by a couple tenths as thats about 300lbs lighter, a Z71 or Trail Boss sounds like it would be a very close race, and a ZR2 might lose by a couple tenths.  In theory its 100lbs/tenth in the 1/4.

Edited by newdude
  • Like 1
Posted
On 9/29/2022 at 10:44 AM, pokismoki said:

sounds to me GM has it fine tuned it to operate with in a tight performance window eceptionally well,  i have no idea what a 3 valve electronic water pump/thermostatic system is, got any photos?

i have my doubts about any aftermarket improvements or ability to tune it.. 

 

 

On 9/29/2022 at 10:52 AM, pokismoki said:

if the exhaust is super hot on 87 it must be very late timing, might not be something I want to use for offroading in a Colorado then, curious what the ZR2 with have in it. might be better off with the big 6

 

i'm probably better off building a 4x4 trailblazer instead 

 

 

 

3.0 Duramax has the exact same Active Thermal Management system on it as well.  There's a few of both motors in some of the Facebook groups with over 100K on them.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, customboss said:

Understood and interesting point about weight differential.  The latest GM 4.3 V6 weght is unknown to me but GM adverts that the L3B is 80lbs less than that. 

 

Trust me that last 50 years was hard on me too.....LOL  

 

 

Understood, and I'm guessing the L3B dimensionally would fit in a lot more places also? 

 

And yes on 80 lbs less than 4.3 and I think from same video or another one from same folks corrected later in video that it was 160 lbs lighter than the 5.3...which I think runs around 530 lbs which I deduced would be near the 375 lb mark, a pentastar v6 is pretty trim and compact and is about 350 lbs so this 4 banger in that same league as other modern na 3.5 liter type v6's. But the ole 4.3 is not like the modern v6's, it's an old v8 with a couple cylinders lopped off.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, customboss said:

I just found a reference that the L3B weighs 250 lbs!  Dang some of you studs out there could lift it out by hand......LOL  

 

https://dustrunnersauto.com/gm-2-7-l3b-turbo-everything-you-need-to-know/

Engine Specifications and Design:

  • Production Run: 2018 – Present
  • Cylinder Head Material: Aluminum
  • Cylinder Block Material: Aluminum
  • Configuration: Inline-4
  • Bore: 92.25 mm
  • Stroke: 102.0 mm
  • Valvetrain: DOHC with four valves per cylinder with VVT and VVL
  • Displacement: 2.7 L (2727 cc)
  • Compression Ratio: 10.0
  • Weight: 250 lbs. 
  • Maximum HP: 325 HP at 5,600 RPM
  • Maximum Torque: 380 lb-ft at 4,000 RPM

wow, that's pretty light, from recollection a pretty efficient and compact modern motor is the pentastar v6 at about 350 lbs and I just mathed backwards from that gm engineering video stating 160 lbs lighter than a 5.3 so went conservative at 375 lbs assuming it's a little more stoutly built, similar to the 3.0 durmax which I believe is about 475 lbs, so I'm not sure I'd buy that it's 250 lbs...sounds too light to me

 

either way there's likely nothing lighter running around with the total power output of that thing and will make an awesome dance partner in the reg cab shorty or any lighter sporty platform, it sure hauls the mail around in my lifted crew that I added 985 lbs in fuel/tools/gear

  • Like 1
Posted
On 9/29/2022 at 11:02 AM, pokismoki said:

GM made an impressive and extremely complicated product.  lease it, enjoy it, then trash it. be curious how it holds up past 8 years 

 

 

The same was said when Ford first switched to ecoboost, now the take rate on them over the 5.0 V8 is something like every 3 out of 4 sold.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • You need a better code reader/scanner.  You are missing codes.  Did the dealer give you a copy of the SAVI scan from that visit?     If the fluid hasn't been changed, change it.  Shudder will likely go away.  
    • TLDR to my other post...   Hard. Pass.  Too many what ifs.     Are you set on a 3.0 Duramax?  Have you considered anything not GM just in case?  If you don't have to have a pickup, lots of other options for $27,000 out there.   
    • I see some red flags.   - No mention in the Carfax if the oil pump belt was changed.  LM2s had a 150,000mi service interval, and its got 164,245mi on it.  So right out the gate it needs about $3000-3500 for that to be done before driving it another 150,000mi.  Belt is at the rear of the engine.     - If something happens to the transmission valve body, the special coverage is expired by mileage.  That will likely be an out of pocket expense, with zero or near zero GM participation if something happened even though its in by time.   - 2020 LM2s seem to need timing chains after 80,000mi at some point.  They fixed this end of 2020/starting 2021 model year engines.  They will usually set a P0016 I think?  There is another $8000-10,000 if it needs a chain.  The main chain is at the back, secondary at the front so the pump belt would be done at the same time if it needed chains.     - Long oil change intervals.  7,000-8,000mi on average, probably close to 0% or perhaps to or beyond 0% on the OLM.  Lots of them not at the dealer which makes me wonder how much of the oil ran through that truck was the proper Dexos D rated 0w20 oil and not just gas engine 0w20, which is not the same at all.     - Long fuel filter changes, again likely taking the fuel filter life to 0% or more.  First one went 28,603, second was done 43,094 miles later at 71,697, from there another 46,452mi to 118,149mi, and then the most recent one 37,026mi later at 155,175mi.  So counting its original fuel filter, its had only 4 fuel filters on it.  No bueno IMO.         Good news?    - It has had only two warranty trips to the dealer.  The first free service (end of December 2020 on the Carfax), and the transmission reprogram recall (end of August 2025 on the Carfax).     - Truck did a LOT of moving, so that might explain the lack of emissions related repairs like bad NOX sensors, bad exhaust temp sensors, bad glow plugs, etc.         The "emissions system checked" could just be how something was flagged for Carfax.  GM dealers have to do SAVI reports for warranty repair orders so they scan the truck.  So its possible that is there for that?  
    • Thank you, @Z45!   NOTE - No all repair shop/Dealers reports to Carfax   That is my main concern.  The CARFAX looks way too clean for a 6 year old anything with 164,245 miles.  Even something known for reliability (like many Toyotas) typically has a lot more replaced, like a Nav screen, interior trim, shock/strut, or brake pads.  And surely the last set of tires (installed at ~58k miles) would be bald unless those were all highway miles.   I'm tempted to pay a local dealer to look up the VIN, but am not sure if that will be worthwhile.  Last time I did this, it was 100% useless, and I felt scammed - they noted the bumper was replaced years ago and that's it.  A 5-year old could spot the accident damage, even though nothing was on the CARFAX.   After giving the dealer a call, the truck may have a hard shift, but they have to verify with their mechanic if that's even a concern.  And I've test driven about a dozen of these now, many near Chicago, and half the trucks shift hard/odd at all throttle positions.  The ones with aftermarket lifts/larger tires shift terrible, and 3 stock trucks shifted so violently I thought the transmission valve body was going out.   At this point I'm conflicted, as I need a vehicle, and am coming up short locally.  Northern trucks in this price range tend to have either multiple owners, a lot of mods (lifts/oversized tires without re-gearing), and are generally in rougher shape.   If this truck showed up in your neighborhood for $27k and you had to purchase it sight-unseen, with the possibility of needing a 10L80 rebuild, torque converter, or rear end - would you do it?  I'm convinced most of the 10L80 trucks I test drove are broken, they can't all shift so bad, with massive flares/slipping/lurching and mis-matched downshifts like a teen driver learning stick.
    • From the spy shots, the front end does look like it's borrowing some styling cues from the Canyon. I'm more interested in the powertrain news than the screens though. If the 3.0 diesel survives into the next generation, that alone will keep a lot of current owners interested.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...