Jump to content

Seized AFM lifter round 3

Mathew Kirsch
 Share

Recommended Posts

Mathew Kirsch Enthusiast

Mathew Kirsch

Posted
Posted

Just paid to have all 16 lifters replaced in my 2015 Silverado 1500 5.3L with 141,000miles, because one seized in the #3 cylinder.

 

This happened the first time back at around 103,000 give or take.

 

Got it back, ran mint. For about 500 miles.

 

Last Saturday I was 150 miles from home, and had just gotten up to highway speed on the expressway when something caught my eye. The traction control light was on, then I saw the check engine light blinking. Sure enough when I got into it even a little, it would start shaking and squeaking. 

 

The mechanic who fixed it came over yesterday and scanned it. Says it's misfiring on #1. So maybe not another seized lifter? Sure feels like one though...

 

'Bout ready to send the truck to the crusher, and swear off GM products for life.

  • Sad 3
diyer2 Senior Enthusiast

diyer2

Posted
Posted

I understand but the install may have something to do with it. 

  • Like 2
16LT4 Enthusiast

16LT4

Posted
Posted (edited)

Plenty of reasons for misfires, I'm assuming the ignition system was ruled out? Intake valve CBU?

Edited by 16LT4
  • Like 1
Mathew Kirsch Enthusiast

Mathew Kirsch

Posted
  • Author
Posted
43 minutes ago, 16LT4 said:

Plenty of reasons for misfires, I'm assuming the ignition system was ruled out? Intake valve CBU?

 

It happened Saturday. I didn't get home until 7PM. Sunday was Sunday. Yesterday was a holiday. 

 

Hopefully he's able to take a look at it today.

 

 

Snowcamo Senior Enthusiast

Snowcamo

Posted
Posted

Lifter, cam pushrods need to be replaced at the same time. Not one or the other. Check the ignition coil to plug wire connections as they corrode over time.

  • Like 1
mjm-1957 Enthusiast

mjm-1957

Posted
Posted

The squeaking is never good, could be a roller let go on one of the lifters and is grinding down the cam lobe.

  • Like 1
customboss Senior Enthusiast

customboss

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, 16LT4 said:

Plenty of reasons for misfires, I'm assuming the ignition system was ruled out? Intake valve CBU?

CBU = internet for carbon build up........gawd that had me wondering what the heck was......cluster bombs etc.....LOL  

  • Haha 1
pokismoki Senior Enthusiast

pokismoki

Posted
Posted (edited)

even the Dodge rocker arms have issues, no matter what truck you buy these days they are all ******! too many gizmos and features..   better off going back to old SB1 motor with carb and mechanical fuel pump and digital ignition. 

 

 

if you stripped off all the emmissions stuff the 5.3 would be awsome again

 

 

Edited by pokismoki
  • Thanks 1
16LT4 Enthusiast

16LT4

Posted
Posted
21 hours ago, customboss said:

CBU = internet for carbon build up........gawd that had me wondering what the heck was......cluster bombs etc.....LOL  

 

Seems to be a bit of a concern for some DI engines in these trucks, but is definitely a concern for Ford Ecoboosts, BMW N54/N55 and VW/Audi EA888 engines.  Just another potential cause of misfires, especially at the OP's 140k+ miles.

 

 

  • Like 1
customboss Senior Enthusiast

customboss

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, 16LT4 said:

 

Seems to be a bit of a concern for some DI engines in these trucks, but is definitely a concern for Ford Ecoboosts, BMW N54/N55 and VW/Audi EA888 engines.  Just another potential cause of misfires, especially at the OP's 140k+ miles.

 

 

Absolutely!  An issue that I worked earnestly on before retirement. Starting with Toyota 3.0 V6's in early 2000 and ended in HD DI diesel engines carbon cleanup in-situ. 

  • Like 1
Mathew Kirsch Enthusiast

Mathew Kirsch

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The mechanic had good news for me. Valve train is OK. Cam is OK.

 

#1 fuel injector is either stuck open or not firing at all. He thinks stuck open because the #1 plug was "washed clean."

 

This is the second time the #1 injector has failed. Happened very early on when the truck only had a couple thousand miles on it.

  • Like 1
diyer2 Senior Enthusiast

diyer2

Posted
Posted

 

Great news. 

A suggestion, shorter OCI's maybe change oil brand. 

 

  • Like 1
KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted

I just noticed there was 2 threads on the same truck. Most people who want to be helpful are going to ask questions. Cost analysis, how many miles, original owner, shape of vehicle, only vehicle. And most important who's doing the work. At different stages in my life I would do things differently. Early on I would do the work myself. Rebuild the top end myself or salvage engine. Probably my only vehicle needing to fly. Staged two fix good enough to trade in. Staged three in my 40s screw it trade in running bad take the hit. In my 50s with the low mileage 6.0 truck available. Pull the 6.0 modify it and the transmission install in the 2015. The parts to do all that is available. In the rust belt my whole out look would be different. I’d have a Subaru for bad weather. My truck would be in the garage it would be cherry. The only that would be original would be the block.. People forget we’re all different, live in different parts of the country. 

  • Like 1
16LT4 Enthusiast

16LT4

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Mathew Kirsch said:

The mechanic had good news for me. Valve train is OK. Cam is OK.

 

#1 fuel injector is either stuck open or not firing at all. He thinks stuck open because the #1 plug was "washed clean."

 

This is the second time the #1 injector has failed. Happened very early on when the truck only had a couple thousand miles on it.

 

And the resulting fuel dilution of the oil is probably at least partially at fault for your repeated lifter/valvetrain issues.  Methinks the crux of the issue has been stumbled upon...

  • Thanks 1
diyer2 Senior Enthusiast

diyer2

Posted
Posted

How often did you change the oil and filter? 

What oil and filter?

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 524 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...