Jump to content

Chevy shake, vibration at highway speeds, my fix and what I found out

danno0676

By danno0676
in Troubleshooting & Recalls

 Share

Recommended Posts

danno0676 New Member

danno0676

Posted
Posted

My first post, I joined to try and help others. 
 

Quick skip to the fix, the drivesahft.

I recently purchased a 2015 Silverado, 4wd, 4 door, 6.5 bed, 5.3, 6 speed auto.

 

First mod, replacement trans to fix the torque converter shutter.

 

Second mod, upgrade the factory 18's to reproduction 20's with 275/60/20 Nitto terra grappler G2's.

 

I drive from VA to PA for work, usually I camp out in the right lane and cruise around ~60, the truck felt good, not smooth, but nice enough after moving from a 2002 F250 CCLB 7.3 that was slightly lifted. On a trip to FL I picked up some speed, 70+, and thought I must have a tire out of balance. At 75+ it was downright awful. 

I would associate the vibration at 70 to a bad u joint, a high speed vibration, but it wouldn't go away with throttle modulation. At 75+ it changed to a more violent shake/wobble. Once in FL I had the tires rebalanced, the 60 below speed was smoother but the 70+ unchanged.

 

Once I had more time I did some intense  internet research and found lots of interesting paths for diagnosis.

First was easy, I was very concerned after reading multiple threads about the G2 tires having vibration issues. Having worked in the auto industry for years in the past, and hearing the "wives tales" about "low quality" aftermarket wheels I was unconcerned about the wheels but I checked them anyway, tires and wheels straight and true.

 

Next, while it was on the lift, I grabbed pry bar and with the truck running in gear I propped it beside the rear driveshaft and watched/listened to it scrape on and off of the pry bar. Shut the truck off and grabbed a run out gauge, 49 thousandths out. 

Next was find a driveshaft. First I tried to source on locally, no one would make one but they were glad to order one for me. So I started to scour the internet, mail order custom made high power/high speed units, or mass production units. I found a company called Powertrain Industries that looked the best, great reviews and all Spicer components on a full 5" tube for about $700-$800. A little more research and I found PTI was recently purchased by Dorman. I called Dorman to get some specifics on their shafts, the person I spoke with confirmed that and told me that they moved all of the shaft production to PTI (the stock photo on the Dorman shaft is a direct image from PTI as well). So in the end I ordered the Dorman shaft for about half the price, installed it, and after a 90mph test drive the truck is as smooth as a Cadi.

Hope this helps someone.
 

IMG_20211210_152443232.jpg

IMG_20220712_102243173.jpg

IMG_20220710_124055982.jpg

IMG_20220710_124037695.jpg

IMG_20220710_124048870.jpg

  • 1 month later...
danno0676 New Member

danno0676

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 8/16/2022 at 8:03 PM, sk said:

So which Dorman p/n did you order?

946-633

That is the number for a crew cab, 6.5' bed, 5.3 4wd. There are a million different wheelbases offered for this truck, different shafts for the v6 model as well because it has a different rear diff (I think).

After some communications with eBay member 
https://www.ebay.com/usr/ultimate_auto_parts?_trksid=p2047675.m3561.l2559

They ARE Dorman and sell quite a bit cheaper than anyone else. 
You can use https://www.dormanproducts.com/ to do a Year Make Model search.

  • 11 months later...
  • 10 months later...
J OBrien Enthusiast

J OBrien

Posted
Posted

You

I just bought a 2023 Silverado 1500 High Country 5.3 (L84) with 10 speed (MHS) 4x4. It shakes, shutters or vibrates from start through all gears at any speed! $75,000 truck! Help! John OBrien
  • 2 weeks later...
MikeBMW Senior Enthusiast

MikeBMW

Posted
Posted
On 6/23/2024 at 9:52 AM, J OBrien said:

You

I just bought a 2023 Silverado 1500 High Country 5.3 (L84) with 10 speed (MHS) 4x4. It shakes, shutters or vibrates from start through all gears at any speed! $75,000 truck! Help! John OBrien

For your 2023, try asking here:
https://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/forum/240-2020-2024-silverado-hd-sierra-hd/

  • 3 months later...
Quili New Member

Quili

Posted
Posted (edited)

I have a 2019 Chevy Silverado trail boss with the same problem. Any suggestions on what I need to do? I already had the transmission flushed like last week but it still has a vibration feel to it.

Edited by Quili
  • 4 months later...
grandpapa20_ Enthusiast

grandpapa20_

Posted
Posted (edited)

I have a 2017 Silverado 1500 on a 7” lift. Has aftermarket wheels and tires. Definitely has a shake bad enough that my driver seat shakes and rattles the mirrors on the doors. Think it could possibly have something to do with the driveshaft? Not sure if it did it Pryor to the lift as it was already lifted when I bought it. 

 

IMG_6335.jpeg

Edited by grandpapa20_
CamGTP Senior Enthusiast

CamGTP

Posted
Posted

First thing is to check the tire balance and road force. Also make sure the wheels are hub centric. If those check out then, I'd measure the driveshaft angles to make sure those are okay, if the angles are too extreme the u-joint can't do their job correctly and it could cause a driveline vibration. Lastly would likely be checking the driveshaft itself, having it balanced checked.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
grandpapa20_ Enthusiast

grandpapa20_

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, CamGTP said:

First thing is to check the tire balance and road force. Also make sure the wheels are hub centric. If those check out then, I'd measure the driveshaft angles to make sure those are okay, if the angles are too extreme the u-joint can't do their job correctly and it could cause a driveline vibration. Lastly would likely be checking the driveshaft itself, having it balanced checked.

Defiantly agree on the road force and things. I know it shook before I had the tires put on about 15,000 miles ago. I really think it might be the driveshaft. Is it possible when the lift was put on and driveshaft got put in, it could be 180 out?

CamGTP Senior Enthusiast

CamGTP

Posted
Posted

The driveshafts are balanced by themselves, it wouldn't make any difference if you flipped the driveshaft at the rear axle.

grandpapa20_ Enthusiast

grandpapa20_

Posted
Posted

Ok. Wasn’t to sure if that could’ve been a possibility or not. I may have the driveshaft balanced then and see if that might be it. I know the wheels were ordered specifically for the truck by the previous owner. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Coastie05
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      Batteries don’t always show signs of a few years ago my vehicle started fine in the morning and took me to work. After work the battery was completely dead and I needed a jump. No, I didn’t leave anything on and the battery was only a couple months old. It was replaced under warranty. 
    • Jake87
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Jake87 · Posted

      AFM is confirmed in the Corvette engine, so I'm assuming the higher volume trucks will get it as well
    • NDKoze
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By NDKoze · Posted

      If his battery was that bad I would think it would have been showing signs before this that were ignored. Stinks that it happened the way it did in rush hour traffic, but this seems like a pretty fringe scenario. I don't mind it that bad and never turn it off. The only slight annoyance for me is the slight delay between brake to gas, but I have gotten used to it and figure if it can save a little gas why not.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.
    • KARNUT
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By KARNUT · Posted

      It was all part of the tiny bit of fuel savings it goes towards what was mandated by the government. Much like cylinder deactivation. That was relaxed by the recent administration. All that doesn’t help the individual buyer. But as a whole helps the manufacturer to try to reach the previous ridiculous past mileage per gallon mandate. So yes it was mandated and added cost to the vehicle. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...