Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

WearOut.jpg.5bb46a854f523774f5dc8d786b2265f0.jpg

 

This is a point of reference argument where no one will agree on A point of reference. Wear in a mechanical device doesn't care what anyone thinks. I just does what it does guided by universal law regardless of the ignorance or education of is observers. 

 

There is a reason a chart like this doesn't have scales for either axis. The height of the graphed line and it's length are dependent on the machines particulars of build and operation but the line exist regardless independently of those conditional sets. 

 

Does it matter? Oh yea. But will the owner 'realize' the fruitage of the seeds he sows? Most likely, he will not. Why?

 

Because along the X axis most people trade very early in the zone of "normal operation" and conclude from not playing the hand they dealt themselves that the cards they dealt didn't matter. The national percentage of powertrains making it to 100K, 200K and 300K prove this majority result. 

 

This is not unlike a child that plants a kernel of corn and because he isn't eating corn on the cob then next day concludes that all the things that a farmer does to reap a crop simply don't matter. Worse he demands that the famer is an ignorant sort and should not be listened to. 

 

You absolutely can do as you please. Has zero effect on my machines. Does not influence my decisions or my pocketbook and I'm way to old to be shamed into giving up on rational thought. 

 

The handful of owners that operate a vehicle well past 500K prove the majority wrong. Do what you've always done and you get what you've always got. 

  • Thanks 2
Posted (edited)

And there’s the rub. Most people on here say I’ll never use a self serve car wash. I do I belong to a club. Every day when I go on my walk I can stop by wash and vacuum my truck. Do I see any scratches? No my 66 year old eyes see a clean truck. The hand washing crowd trucks looks good on the weekends mine looks good everyday. Will changing the oil early and more often make my ride last 300K or longer? How many really want a ride that long. Can you patch your underwear for longevity? Probably. Both would be about as comfortable to use. 

Edited by KARNUT
  • Haha 1
Posted
15 hours ago, FJB said:

I'm still making early oil change no matter what internet EXPERTS TELL  ME .

spacer.png

 

😀jk

 

And here is a live shot of Grumpy figuring all this #@#@ out!🤣

spacer.png

  • Like 2
  • Haha 4
Posted
1 hour ago, BIGDOGx said:

spacer.png

 

😀jk

 

And here is a live shot of Grumpy figuring all this #@#@ out!🤣

spacer.png

 

I NEVER EVER wear shorts. 

Ever!

image.jpeg.13c03883c6c3ce9fdaed45e17416d61b.jpeg

  • Haha 1
Posted

What!? No shorts! Over 60 degrees shorts for me. It says I’m retired I don’t care I’m comfortable. Of course having pretty legs helps. 😎

  • Haha 1
Posted

This is Grumpy figuring tomorrow's breakfast.😀

  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, diyer2 said:

This is Grumpy figuring tomorrow's breakfast.😀

 

4 hours ago, BIGDOGx said:

spacer.png

 

😀jk

 

And here is a live shot of Grumpy figuring all this #@#@ out!🤣

spacer.png

 

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

Yeah, it is thin, for sure. I remember changing the oil in a minivan the wife drove several years ago and it was 0W-20, also. I was like this is just Crisco vegetable oil! Peanut oil for frying a turkey is thicker than that! LOL!

 

Amazing how engine and oil technology has evolved over the years to what we have today. Not all are perfect, but the advancements made are pretty impressive. Enjoy your new truck, FJB.

Edited by ShotgunZ71
  • Like 2
Posted

On the theme of early oil change on a new vehicle.. is there such a thing of "breaking-in" on the speed limit before taking it to higher speeds?  Not talking about racing or WOT just normal driving.

  • Like 1
Posted

I wonder if anyone has sent their new oil in for evaluation. That would end speculation and prove the manufacturers are full of it. I've only had one engine failure in 40 plus years. Not from oil. The new engines with cylinder deactivation are more sensitive to clean oil. Not that I would ever buy one, never! It would be good to know.

Posted
6 hours ago, RedLT said:

On the theme of early oil change on a new vehicle.. is there such a thing of "breaking-in" on the speed limit before taking it to higher speeds?  Not talking about racing or WOT just normal driving.

 

I say "no", there's no such thing. Normal driving is perfectly fine. I drive my vehicles normal from the test drive to the time I trade or sell. I go above 55, sometimes even have to brake hard. No issues to date. Yes, even a few heavy-foot moments with less than 1000 miles have occurred. Don't do these things repetitively and all should be good. Not going to purchase a vehicle and ****-foot the test drive or the first 500 or 1000 miles. That's just crazy. Don't flog it continuously, but don't baby it either.

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, RedLT said:

On the theme of early oil change on a new vehicle.. is there such a thing of "breaking-in" on the speed limit before taking it to higher speeds?  Not talking about racing or WOT just normal driving.

 

I'm wasting my time on this but it's my time to waste, right? 

 

Break in is about HEAT management. Everything expands when heated and when things expand clearance diminishes. I'll keep this simple looking at only piston to cylinder clearance. When a motor is built it has a target 'cold' clearance that is published. But it also has a targeted hot clearance that is not published. No matter what the cold clearance is the hot clearance is the same. Trust me on that or don't. Makes no difference to me. How much cold clearance is called out depend on alloys and construction and expected operating conditions. All things that concern heat and heat is the variable of expansion. All meant to reach a prescribed hot clearance. This clearance is the number that supports the rings and limits gas exchange. Blow by. 

 

When a motor is "new' the finish is rougher that it will be after 'break in' and so during break in it runs hotter than it will once broke in. Rougher surfaces run hotter. Speed and load determine the amount of 'sensible heat' generated and loading it too much or running it to fast heats a part with less clearance NOW than it will have THEN and to that point enough heat is generated to 'hot weld' asperities. Yes that increases clearance if you are fortunate and if not it will seize the piston in the cylinder and destroy it. After about a hundred plus years of consumers 'knowing more than designers" they almost have this stupid proof. Almost. Few motors lock up anymore BUT what does happen is you end product life is SHORTENED by the amount of clearance your ignorance demanded.

 

Things wear in, then they wear, then eventually, they wear out. What is worn out? Too much clearance or uneven wear. 

 

Your book talks from both sides of the page. Elaborate break in is not required BUT keeping it within the book boundaries can add significant life to the assembly. Believe, don't believe. The universe could care less. 

 

WearOut.jpg.5bb46a854f523774f5dc8d786b2265f0.jpg

 

Good break in moves you to the left in the area of "Normal Operation". Ignoring it moves you to the right. 

 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
  • Thanks 1
Posted

You didn't waste your time. After 40 years in automotive engineering I just learned something new.  Your explanation should be published in the owners manual.  As a guy who is always asking "why?", I appreciate the reason why a break-in period is needed. I knew that mating parts needed to be cycled to be worn in together but I didn't know that the (excessive) heat played such a major role.  I thought it was excessive stress, but then what causes the excessive stress? The heat!

  • Thanks 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,782
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    ShowMeShooter1332
    Newest Member
    ShowMeShooter1332
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 5,829 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I was around and remember that era very well, so I'm calling b/s on that statement. If they were that bad no police department or taxi company would've bought a single one ... but they were used in both services (and fire) for DECADES. They were bulletproof and proven. Even the early 21st century ones weren't too bad! The early models were legendary.   Mine is proof, but people like atlas are blinded by agenda and refuse to believe facts right before their very eyes.   Even decades after they were built, a new generation started driving them, posting all their builds and shenanigans on Grandmarq.net and Crownvic.net. The failures would show up then, since they all were deep past 100k-150k miles by that point, and younger drivers tend to be a little aggressive, especially with vehicles than can lay a one-tire fire for as long as you hold your foot in it. They've more than proven themselves over the decades.   The only thing that'll really take them out is road salt. The bodies and sheet metal were garbage. A victim of the cheapout FoMoCo and GM have been partaking in before then, and since.   Today it's the stuff that counts - the undercarriage that rots away first!    GMs Caprice was no slouch either. Reliable as a stone ax - the opposite of what they build now.    
    • Let me know how your vehicles do in 10 years. You don't know ******, kid. 😂    There's a reason that Panther platform was used as police, fire, and taxi service for DECADES ... long before you were born, apparently.
    • If your connector also has a big lever to get the connector on and off, you don't want to force the lever either way, as it becomes a bigger problem if you bust the lever or the mechanism it works.
    • It's just useful to disconnect the battery to prevent odd shorting out when unplugging/plugging stuff together.  I also  touch the two cable ends together (after disonnecting) to drain the small amount of stored battery energy in various modules.   I believe the main system where you need to be more concerned with, so you need to do the above and then wait some time, iss when you are working on the air bag system, to prevent inadvertent firing of the air bags.   The in-cab switches are just that, plain switches, it's generally not a problem to swap them in/out.  For my '12, I'll get an error message on the dash if I power up the truck w them unplugged, but that's it (power up= turn the ignition on).   The ITBC located above the spare tire is a computer that manages the trailer brake system.  That is probably more important to have the battery disconnected.  It does have to be programmed to the truck, either before or after it's installed, for it to work.  For my '12, I had a very hard time reinstalling the main connector to it (IDK if yours is the same or not), it turned out the silicon seal was jamming up, preventing it from going on all the way.  I finally got it fully installed by lubing the seal with a bit of dielectric grease, then it slid on and latched in place easily.
    • JR ! I just got the truck back from the Dealership today . The technician did a cold remote start on the truck this morning and it made the noise . It was determined that it was a starter issue and replaced it under warranty . Of course   it did not make the sound after a new starter was put in because the truck was not cold . We will we see what happens tomorrow morning when I start the truck cold  . Keep tuned !   Oh I found a video on YouTube of a cold start and it did the same thing your truck and mine do , I will see if I can find it and post it up
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...