Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Edit: Going from 2020 Bose to 2023 Bose

 

Curious if anyone has gone from a 19/20 to "refresh" and can speak about the sound quality differences.  Less bass/more?  Is it any clearer?  I see some people saying the Bose is garbage but is there a significant change between the non-refresh and the refresh?  While not a "great" sound in my 2020, it suffices my needs

 

Bass is pretty easy to "fix" but if there's a ton of distortion etc, that starts getting pricy..... adding amps, speakers, etc etc

 

Thanks!

Edited by Rob Mugs
Posted
21 hours ago, Rob Mugs said:

Curious if anyone has gone from a 19/20 to "refresh" and can speak about the sound quality differences.  Less bass/more?  Is it any clearer?  I see some people saying the Bose is garbage but is there a significant change between the non-refresh and the refresh?  While not a "great" sound in my 2020, it suffices my needs

 

Bass is pretty easy to "fix" but if there's a ton of distortion etc, that starts getting pricy..... adding amps, speakers, etc etc

 

Thanks!

I seriously doubt they changed anything with the speakers other than upgraded the infotainment software/hardware. You won't see the kind of change you're talking about till the next major change if then.

 

Posted (edited)

Well, I had a 21 RST with Bose, got a 23 LT Trail Boss with non-Bose, its a huge disappointment with that downgrade. 

Edited by mrfarb
Posted (edited)

I've driven plenty of 19-22 at work and I myself own a 2022 refresh LT non-Bose.

 

The non-Bose refresh LT has better sound than the 19-22 non Bose LT by a good margin IMO.  19-22 non-Bose has a garbage base range to it.  I don't like full on thumping bass, but you set it to +12 and its like listening to a 14-18 non-Bose with default bass settings.  

Edited by newdude
Posted

My 2023 Sierra Denali Ultimate Bose system is night and day better than my 2019 High Country, I see a speaker in the windshield pillars and upper rear doors and center channel all of which I didn't have on my 19 HC and it's sounds much better to me.

Posted
On 5/9/2023 at 7:53 AM, David Sherill said:

Went from 21 AT4 to 23 AT4 both with Bose and neither sound great but the 21 was definitely better.  Will probably add Kicker sub in the future.

Interesting...... they're both the "refresh", right?  Is it just less bass on the 23?  I pick mine up Monday

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

23 Silverado HC bose stereo was one of the least impressive systems I've ever heard... from any vehicle. It was somehow even worse than the 2020 Sierra Denali. Just very flat, under powered, no base, etc.

 

Now the upgraded Bose in the Denali Ultimate is on a whole different level. Much fuller sound, nice sound stage, and actually has descent base and treble. Although at this price point, it's basically mandatory. Then again, the Denali and HC aren't exactly cheap trucks either. They deserve better.

Posted

Interesting how some say the refresh is much better and some say it is much worse.

 

I've gone from '21 to '23 - both Denali. (not Denali Ultimate, which has a 12 speaker Bose vs the 7 speaker Bose in 'regular' denali

I've only run a 100 miles or so in the new one, but first impressions were that it was better. Not 'night and day' different, but improved.

So far just listening to my usual FM 'classic rock' station, and a little bit of SiriusXM.

Perhaps it is just the eq settings?  Maybe just placebo effect?

Haven't bothered to investigate settings too much yet. 

 

UQA    Bose Sound System, premium 7-speaker system with Richbass woofer 

UQS    Bose Premium Series with 12-speaker system with CenterPoint, Richbass woofer and AudioPilot

 

Posted

Audio source is a good point. Compressed and relatively lower quality source like FM or SiriusXM aren't going to sound great regardless of the stereo. In fact, they tend to sound worse on higher end systems. You might have one that gets a bit more base with some basic EQ adjustment and be perfectly happy with it. Even though it may or may not be the "lesser" system.

 

I stream with Google Play Music at the highest quality setting. Although whenever I do get a vehicle with a good stereo, I'll usually jump over to Tidal or something similar. If you can't tell the difference, the stereo is either not good enough, you just don't have an ear for it. 😉

Posted (edited)

Fwiw, it was much easier to judge the sound quality with these factory systems when they included CD players where you could run a solid known reference quality CD.  Now, it's much harder to figure out what the real capabilities are.  Although I haven't had the truck long enough to get to the audio, I've found so far that running the highest quality Spotify that is saved to my phone makes a noticeable improvement. 

 

Also, I pulled a number of albums and playlists that I had ripped from CD to 320kpbs which sounds pretty good as well.  I find that fading 2 notches to the back, and bumping the treble a couple of notches makes the system sound fairly decent.  If I find that the system can handle lossless like FLAC, I'll do another round of rips.

 

I had pretty good luck with my Vette replacing the Bose speakers with JL C2-******  series speakers, and will probably try that too, once I get some of the other more important mods done.

Edited by MrMagloo
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

2019 SLT w Bose sounded much richer than our new 2023 AT4 w Bose

Until I added the GM Kicker subwoofer part #19417164

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,764
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Tbhats2130
    Newest Member
    Tbhats2130
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,046 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Google converting 98 4.3 spider injection to carburetor if all else fails. 
    • My centre console USB ports haven’t been working and the one in the glovebox is starting to act up. When I plug my phone into the cord the radio will go black and stop playing, and the CarPlay is inconsistent.   I checked the fuses and they were fine. I changed the USB port out and still nothing. Hoping for some advice on what I should be looking at.  
    • The truck is a 1995 Chevrolet S10 Blazer, 4.3 VIN "W" engine. :cracks knuckles:   On a whim - because I needed a headache - this truck was for sale so I stopped to take a look. Doesn't run. Well, it does, but barely. Long crank, choppy idle, bad misfire(s), it REEKS of fuel. I can DO this..I'm thinking. Diamond in the rough. One owner until last year. A young guy is selling it, he bought it 6 months ago. It stranded him more than once, he's got a newborn. It was in the shop 10 days ago and he "thinks" they said it needs a new fuel injection system. He can't put any more money into it, needs it gone. I was thinking of upgrading my Macbook, which is a total want, not a need. For less than the price of a new laptop I can have fun for months tinkering on this truck and enjoying it. I'm taking this truck home. The guy was beyond thrilled, his wife was there, she thanked me profusely, I could tell they were hurting. They seemed like good people in a bind.   Some parts, a wash, maybe a set of tires, and I can have a few months of fun and then turn it for beer money (or the next project).   Sure enough, there's a work order from a shop last week in the INCHES of paperwork on this truck dating back to when the first owner bought it. They put a new distributor in it, fuel injection work describes basically opening the plenum and putting it back together. He said he couldn't afford any more work so he had them button it up and that's when he put it up for sale.   I'm not well versed in 4.3. I did discover 1995 uses the 1992-1995 SCPI "Spider" injector which is riddled with issues from splitting lines, clogged or cracked poppet valves and plastic spider legs that crumble over time. Cool. I'll just order me a ne---. Oh, the auto parts store doesn't have it? Rock Auto doesn't have it. eBay? $$$$$$ for used. These are UNAVAILABLE period end of story unless you know "a guy" who's still got one in a box somewhere.   Can't upgrade to the '96-'04 injector, it's a different plenum, wiring/pinout and sensor config.   There are a few kinda "know a guy" -guy rebuild services for these injectors out there for about $350. Okay, Okay... I'd like to know if anyone has used them? Anyone got a lead on these crappy 92-95 spiders?   I also don't want to send MY spider to Narnia and back without knowing if that's truly the problem. I guess I'll need to pull apart the plenum and do some digging.   I was also thrown for a loop. This 1995 model year truck has an OBD-II connector. The interface is decidedly not OBD-II. I can read and reset trouble codes and view live data, but there's not a lot of data. Like misfire count and on what cylinder, that's not there. It's OBD-1.5.   Nothing is ever easy. Now it makes sense why this guy wanted to disappear this thing for cheap. I'm guessing the shop told him the injector is toast, the part is unobtainable and they're not going to sort sending the thing to a rando offering rebuild service on craigslist, and the kid likely can't be without a working car for 3 weeks even if they'd facilitate that.   Experience with these early SCPI's? Stories? Things to check? Sympathy? (..Nah...)   This can sit until I sort it. But I haven't had a problem with a vehicle I couldn't easily solve in a long time.    
    • I have four that read by the dash 8 to 10% better than miles/pump calculations and I have one that is spot on. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...