Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I ordered a 2024 3500 gasser crew cab long bed. About 6 weeks ago my dealer contacted me and said they had an allocation for a truck and could do everything I wanted except the long bed. I wanted a truck asap so I said order it but let me know if a long bed build becomes available in the near future as if it were only a matter of 2-3 weeks I might wait for the long bed.   So the short bed is built and in transit from Oshawa.   I was told the long bed build was also picked up but they don't know where it's coming from until they get a vin#.

I would rather have the long bed and I would rather have a truck from the Flint plant I think.  I actually grew up in the area and had friends that worked at the truck plant so there's a little bit of sentiment involved.   But just curious if anyone has reason to believe the quality is better in one plant or the other.     

Posted

Oshawa only builds crew cab standard box Chevy.  Flint builds everything else including what Oshawa builds. Both plants are good.  Oshawa has been struggling getting things shipped due to train and truck shortages.  

 

#iworkforGM

Posted

Flint, Silao, Oshawa and Ft.Wayne all pump out great quality for the most part.

 

I'd take an Oshawa truck any day as Oshawa has been one of GM's top rated plants for YEARS in the past.  They ran truck production for many years until 2008 or so when GM dropped trucks from there.  They also made in the past many of the W body products, 14-20 Impala, 10-15 Camaro, and much more.  

 

Silao doesn't do HD's but I've had zero build quality issues with my 2022 1/2 ton crew cab.  

Posted

Thanks for the thoughts,   So The long box would be from Flint which I suspected.  Now to figure out if I want to wait for it.   The old 2020 has 145k on it and I do a lot of driving.

Posted

Strictly anecdotal but in the years gone by my personal observation was that the Oshawa truck did not hold up as well for rust through. Again, thats just what I saw. 

As far as today, as MTU says, Oshawa has had some significant shipping issues. Its widespread though since it took Precision 15 days to get my truck 12 miles across town from Flint assy. For over $150 per mile I would have pushed it there. 

Posted

My last two trucks came from Flint and I had no problems, plus it just felt kind of good to be driving a truck built in the plant I had driven by probably a thousand times, maybe more. 

You would think you could get it a little faster when the dealership is 20 minutes away for sure.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I ordered a 2024 2500 High Country gas this spring of 2023.  It was built in Oshawa and has been waiting since late May 2023 to get on a train.  It is now July 28 2023 and can't get any answers as to when it might get on a train to Denver, Colorado.  All I'm told is that it's a train issue. Initially it was supposed to arrive in Denver late May or early June 2023.  I've been ordering Chevy pickups and suv's since the 1980's from Chevy for our construction/real estate company and never had to wait this long.  Very disappointed.  This might be the last time I order a Chevy product.

 

  • Sad 1
Posted

The fact that it shows in shipping doesnt necessarily mean its ready to ship. Theres some semantics in the terms since the truck could be in shipping but still have a hold on it for a repair or a built short item. Some part of the issues with slow "shipping" are likely due to holds on the vehicle for a variety of reasons. 

Posted

You’d think GM could save a bundle and have happier customers by setting up some sort of minimally staffed factory pick up program. They probably could charge $500 per truck for the “privilege” of picking it up in lieu of shipping charges. The dealers would fight it, though. 

Posted (edited)

GM makes profit from the shipping charges, The current model has been around forever, I wouldnt look for it to ever change. 

Having said that,I witnessed (40+ yrs ago) a couple times where a new car was delivered straight to the customer once it came off the line but these were well connected people that worked literally 300 yds from the gate where the cars were staged at the plant. 

Edited by 64BAwagon
Posted (edited)
On 7/29/2023 at 11:08 AM, Another JR said:

You’d think GM could save a bundle and have happier customers by setting up some sort of minimally staffed factory pick up program. They probably could charge $500 per truck for the “privilege” of picking it up in lieu of shipping charges. The dealers would fight it, though. 

They all have union contracts with shippers and if they ever tried that there likely would be a teamsters strike and shut everything down industry wide.  Not only that, the vehicles are not ready to drive away as many need the dealer to take it out of hibernation and install misc items that the plant does not.  All these stories about circumventing the shipping and picking up at the plant are just that, stories.  There is NO WAY to avoid paying the shipping charges.  Even Corvette's with museum delivery option have to place order with dealer (and pay dealer for everything), pay the same shipping as every other one + an additional optional fee for museum delivery and then it has to be delivered to a local dealer for prep and then delivered to the museum. 

Edited by elcamino
  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Took delivery 7/1/23 of my 2024 long bed from  the Flint plant, which is what my preference was.  Happy so far, some minor changes that I prefer from my 2020.  Overall I love the new truck. 

Posted
On 7/28/2023 at 7:34 AM, TechCon said:

I ordered a 2024 2500 High Country gas this spring of 2023.  It was built in Oshawa and has been waiting since late May 2023 to get on a train.  It is now July 28 2023 and can't get any answers as to when it might get on a train to Denver, Colorado.  All I'm told is that it's a train issue. Initially it was supposed to arrive in Denver late May or early June 2023.  I've been ordering Chevy pickups and suv's since the 1980's from Chevy for our construction/real estate company and never had to wait this long.  Very disappointed.  This might be the last time I order a Chevy product.

 

It is now Aug 20 2023 and it's still waiting to get on a train.  Very frustrating.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 2,148 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...