Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Does anybody know what the steel wheel load ratings are? And are the steel wheels on the work trucks/lower trims the same as the spare steel wheels? 

 

 

USD20GMT172A021003.webp.jpg

USD20GMT172A021002.webp.jpg

USD20GMT172A021001.webp.jpg

Posted
22 hours ago, silveradosid said:

there is a load rating on the sidewall of the tire at a rated psi

 

Thank you on this. I have a 2014 Sierra and dont have access to them personally. The wheel also should have its own load rating separate from the tire itself. I am more curious as to if the steel spares are the same wheels or not. The part #s are different and the wheel prices are very different in range from the spares to the actual 4 wheels. These look pretty good IMHO is why i am asking, and not able to go around to check them out myself right now in the near future. They could be a good cheap alternative for wheeling.

 

14 hours ago, AJMBLAZER said:

My spare is on a 17” aluminum rim. 
 

 

IMG_2919.jpeg

 

Do you know if your aluminum wheels are like the old 17x7.5 or updated 17x8? my search has been inconsistent on the actual width of the aluminum wheels. Also, is there a wheel load rating embossed in the back side of that spare? 

Posted

Steel spares are the same as the production ones, but painted black and a temporary tire. They are 7.5 if I remember correctly. I was researching them on ebay the other year. You can find aftermarket steel wheels in 17x8 or 17x9 that are cheaper than the OE steel wheels even used ones.

Posted
5 hours ago, henrypbui said:

 Do you know if your aluminum wheels are like the old 17x7.5 or updated 17x8? my search has been inconsistent on the actual width of the aluminum wheels. Also, is there a wheel load rating embossed in the back side of that spare? 

Sorry I don’t. It’s under the truck facing down so you can’t see the markings. I found that picture online

Posted

Interesting that aluminum spare is on a truck. I have only seen those on Tahoes and Suburbans and clone SUVs.

Posted (edited)
On 1/10/2024 at 6:56 AM, henrypbui said:

Does anybody know what the steel wheel load ratings are? And are the steel wheels on the work trucks/lower trims the same as the spare steel wheels?

 

 

 

 

I've never seen the load ratings published from GM ever.  

 

Spare wheels are typically designated by configuration of the truck.  A heavier optioned truck like an SLT or Denali might have the aluminum wheel vs. the steel wheel as the spare is a larger and heavier tire, but a WT or LT might have that same tire but a steel wheel.  No real rhyme or reason that I can come up with other than that.  

 

They've got two steel wheels and one aluminum.  Of the two steels, one is the same wheel as the factory 17" steel wheel you've posted on that GMC (same p/n).  The other I think has a different design with a whole bunch of small holes in it, like what they used on the 14-18 trucks.  The alumium is that one that's posted in here the black 7 spoke.

 

As far as the load rating, one could technically assume that its a minimum of 1825lbs?  I say this with the fact that the highest possible GVWR on a new 1500 is 7300lbs.  If we divide that by 4, that's 1825lbs per corner.  I'd like to think its higher than that number, probably over 2000lbs, but again, I've never seen the data anywhere.  

Edited by newdude
Posted

Now you mention it, the PPV vehicles used the small hole version of the steel wheel.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, GETGONE said:

Now you mention it, the PPV vehicles used the small hole version of the steel wheel.

 

 

Stock Silverado steel just painted black.  I'd post a picture but this site hates me now and won't let me lol so here's a link - https://images.app.goo.gl/GKVZVPr7n5SxSVrX7

 

New T1 PPVs are on 20" steels.  

Edited by newdude
Posted

Maybe some of the police around me swapped theirs. I swear I've seen them running small hole wheels. I do like the older larger hole ones, but not sure if they clear the T1 calipers.

 

Those T1 PPV 20" steelies are going for over $2K a set WITHOUT tires!

Posted (edited)

I have found multiple PNs for these wheels same design. The 1s described for WT wheels are selling a little over $50 a wheel as the spares are $130 or more for black, silver, and 1 with no mention. Steels should be 17x8 and the aluminums i have found sellers/forum members are saying 17x7.5 anr 17x8. 

 

I know my K2XX are 17x8 steel take offs i have and aluminum were 17.x7.5 spares. 

 

Part #s i have found

 

Gm steel wheel part #s

86508934 black not sure of what material

84947816 aluminum spare wheels

84440191 silver steel spare wheels 

560-08130 Black steel spare wheels

84927607 stock front and rear steel wheels

 

The last part # 84927607 are selling at dealers online from $48-80, locally my search shows $60 cheapest. All the other wheels are almost 3xs the price. 

 

Personally I like the looks of the steel wheels better than most aftermarket steel wheels. Even the aluminum spares look good, just they probably wouldnt be a good wheel to tow up to 10k lbs with being a cast wheel from china dependent if there is an actual load rating for them around 2300lbs. Or so. Example of the steel wheels repainted on a GX470

img_1_1704832476791.jpg

Edited by henrypbui
Adding more to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Looks tight. Not a lot of working room. Hows yous knuckles?
    • Spot on. The government makes ridiculous mandates, and this causes manufacturers to jump through hoops for every TENTH of a MPG. Main reason quality is in the toilet and prices are in the stratosphere.   The gov't tightened the MPG requirements so much 5 years ago that the only way manufacturers could meet these absolutely ridiculous numbers was to go all EV. Hence the push.     Nobody hates good MPG, Atlas - nobody is "whining". Your side has that trait all locked up. What a stupid argument attempt!   What I particularly hate is the government meddling in the free market system. Had this system been allowed to work as designed and intended by our Founders, cars and trucks would be hitting numbers that would blow our minds, all while costing 30% LESS. Not only that, but engines could probably hit 150k miles again without needing major internal surgery.   My forty year old Ford 302 has 312k on it. Wonder what changed?🤔
    • The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...