Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey all, seen the New 6.2L has max tow of 13,100lbs for a half ton. 

Did GM put a 3/4 ton frame in half tons to get this towing capacity?

What is the new crewcab payloads?

 

My 18 Chevy ltz crewcab with 6.2l, 8 speed, 3.73 gears has max towing of 11,800 and 1850lb payload in comparison.

Later-

Posted

no 3/4 frame as far as I know. Tongue weight and max vehicle weight will determine if it is good to go. Combined 13,000 is good as long as the others are met.

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
21 hours ago, James Beyer said:

Hey all, seen the New 6.2L has max tow of 13,100lbs for a half ton. 

Did GM put a 3/4 ton frame in half tons to get this towing capacity?

What is the new crewcab payloads?

 

My 18 Chevy ltz crewcab with 6.2l, 8 speed, 3.73 gears has max towing of 11,800 and 1850lb payload in comparison.

Later-

 

 

No.  NHT and non NHT trucks, they all have the same frames.  Spring rates are increased, heavier cooling, taller gearing and the 9.76" axle instead of the 9.5".  

 

As for payload, gotta check the door stickers as they print the towing and payloads on a tag in the driver's door jamb.  

 

Also.  Sure, they "advertise" that weight, but they leave out the fine print in how they get to that weight.  

 

To truly, safely tow 13,000lbs regularly and reliably, that's 3/4 ton truck territory (gas or diesel).  Figure you try and hook up 13,000lbs.  Tongue weight is 10 to 15% of the trailer weight (the trailer stickers on the trucks calculate 10%).  So 10% would be 1,300lbs on the tongue.  If you payload at 1650lbs, that leaves you 350lbs of room. 

 

You have to count every ounce when trying to get that "max advertised" number, and yet I still see 1/2 tons with their bumpers dragging on the ground overloaded or over tongued and they just don't care.    

Edited by newdude
  • Like 1
Posted
21 hours ago, newdude said:

 

 

No.  NHT and non NHT trucks, they all have the same frames.  Spring rates are increased, heavier cooling, taller gearing and the 9.76" axle instead of the 9.5".  

 

As for payload, gotta check the door stickers as they print the towing and payloads on a tag in the driver's door jamb.  

 

Also.  Sure, they "advertise" that weight, but they leave out the fine print in how they get to that weight.  

 

To truly, safely tow 13,000lbs regularly and reliably, that's 3/4 ton truck territory (gas or diesel).  Figure you try and hook up 13,000lbs.  Tongue weight is 10 to 15% of the trailer weight (the trailer stickers on the trucks calculate 10%).  So 10% would be 1,300lbs on the tongue.  If you payload at 1650lbs, that leaves you 350lbs of room. 

 

You have to count every ounce when trying to get that "max advertised" number, and yet I still see 1/2 tons with their bumpers dragging on the ground overloaded or over tongued and they just don't care.    

 

It's not just the payload (which is a big enough problem). These ratings don't distinguish between a 20 foot flatbed hauling steel at 13k pounds with no wind resistance, and a 35 foot toy hauler loaded to the max. Those are 2 totally different towing scenarios.

  • Like 1
Posted

My 2023 Silverado 1500 crew cab short bed 4wd LTZ with NHT shows a payload of 1826 pounds and a tow rating of 13200 pounds. This truck was ordered without sunroof, bed liner or running boards to help with the payload.

  • Like 1
Posted

Qualitatively it's night and day difference between the 1500 and 2500 regardless of the similar stats.  Pulling an 11k trailer with 1300lbs of tongue was rough with the 1500 nht.  3/4 Duramax was much more composed.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Whoever greenlighted the work truck matte black front bumpers on every trim but the AT4X should be fired!  I was hoping that was an AI mistake, but just realized they were on every model of the 2027 Silverado too.     Some parts of the interior do look premium, but the Denali Ultimate dashboard looks like an afterthought.  At least they appear to have lost the microfiber the high end Silverado models showed, but the '27 High Country dash looks better than the Denali.  
    • New member here. I am researching a read-first event-recorder concept for late-model GM V8 trucks. This is not a sales post. There is no product link, price, preorder, or mailing list. I am trying to determine whether the underlying problem is real before building anything.   Has your truck ever had a brief problem such as: - rough running or a momentary misfire - an oil-pressure warning or unusual pressure event - reduced power or a brief stall - a U-code or lost-communication problem - a symptom that disappeared before the dealer or independent shop could reproduce it   If so, I would appreciate the following details: - year, model, engine, and mileage - what happened and under what conditions - whether a DTC and useful freeze-frame data were stored - whether the shop was able to reproduce it - what the eventual confirmed repair was, if known - what additional information would have helped the diagnosis   The concept being evaluated is a removable leave-in recorder that continuously retains a rolling window from before and after an event. It would not tune, reflash, clear codes, or change the vehicle calibration.   I am also not claiming that it could predict lifter failure or see every internal ECM variable.   The real question is whether continuous event history would add enough useful evidence beyond freeze frame, GDS2, and existing scan tools — or whether it would simply be another unnecessary gadget.   For owners and technicians, which problem would make something like this genuinely useful: 1. intermittent misfire or AFM/DFM-related behavior 2. oil-pressure events 3. lost communication or electrical faults 4. none of the above Please be blunt. Negative feedback is just as useful as positive feedback.
    • No tears over the SLE and SLT trim levels disappearing but I kind of loathe the "Elevation" name. It's a truck--skip the elegance.   The slab-dashboard design is decidedly different. Almost has a Hummer flavor to it. "Professional Grade" seems to be leaning very white-collar, tech-driven these days moreso than blue-collar, functional design.   The Silverado would be my choice between the two new trucks. Pleased with the engine lineup in both. The GMC is a little "too much" for a truck, IMO, and the Denali borders on ridiculous - but I do know there are buyers for luxury trucks out there. It's just not my speed.
    • Your safety is of utmost importance, @joshua1221, and we understand the importance of having all your lights working in your truck. If you have not already, we highly encourage you to bring your concerns to the attention of your local GM dealer. They are in the best position to diagnose your concerns as well as confirm the compatibility of the mirrors with your truck. Additionally, we would like the opportunity to explore any way we may be of assistance. When you have a moment, please visit: https://s.gm.com/support-request and fill out the support request form with all pertinent details. This form helps our team gather the right information and ensures your request is routed appropriately.
    • - I like the outside but not as much as the Chevrolet.  They ICE'd the EV styling and it works, but I think exterior goes to Chevy on this one.     - SLE and SLT dead = Not.  Surprising.  Fits into the rest of the GMC lineup like this which (aside from Pro) matches the rest of the family.  Elevation, AT4, Denali.     - Interior.  Sophisticated Malaise era.  Why do I say Malaise?  Drawn with a ruler.  Rectangles everywhere.  Looks very premium though.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...