Jump to content

Immobilizer

Crazy Canuck
 Share

Recommended Posts

Crazy Canuck Enthusiast

Crazy Canuck

Posted
Posted

So I just got a letter from my insurance company stating that my 24 Denali HD was high risk for theft and if I didn't install an aftermarket immobilizer with a pin or code that I would have to pay a $1,500 theft surcharge on to of my renewal premium.  Anyone have advice on what I should look for?  I imagine I would lose both my remote start with the fob or the app?

CamGTP Senior Enthusiast

CamGTP

Posted
Posted

Get a different insurance company?

 

I've never heard of that before. My family owns 2 newer Kia/Hyundai cars and have no high risk for theft and I live somewhat close to Minneapolis.

Crazy Canuck Enthusiast

Crazy Canuck

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I am going to look around for sure.  I went these guys as they were quite a bit cheaper than my previous supplier.  I'm Canada so afraid if one is doing it, they all will be as insurance is quite regulated here.

CamGTP Senior Enthusiast

CamGTP

Posted
Posted

Just seems so odd that they say your truck is a theft risk. Sure it costs a lot but with the new computer systems for 2024's, you'd think they'd be really hard to steal without a key.

bruceb58 Enthusiast

bruceb58

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, CamGTP said:

Get a different insurance company?

Exactly what I would do.

ManyCamaroz Enthusiast

ManyCamaroz

Posted
Posted

A coworker's SIlverado was stolen several months ago in Houston. Security camera footage showed them roll up at 4:56am and roll out 5 minutes later. They used some electronic device to flash and reprogram the computer.

rdonarski Enthusiast

rdonarski

Posted
Posted

Wow, it's a sad world out there! I live in N WI. I monitor boat landings. A couple weeks ago I noticed a guy left his keys in the ignition in his truck when he went out on the lake. Clearly, he isn't concerned about theft. I'm sure there is plenty of crime up here but nowhere near as much as the big cities.

Another JR Senior Enthusiast

Another JR

Posted
Posted

Immobilizers involve cutting into the ignition control wiring of your truck. They inherently add several failure modes both due to the cut wiring and the device itself that reduce the reliability of your truck. I use my truck for remote camping and would not want this.  I’d be finding a new insurance company. 

  • Like 1
Crazy Canuck Enthusiast

Crazy Canuck

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Ya, I have been thinking about the warranty and potential for problems.  I made a couple of calls today and two other insurance companies i spoke with seem to be as much or more as the one I am with when you add in their surcharge.  A guy I am golfing with tomorrow is a broker, I am going to ask his opinion as well.

MTU Alum Enthusiast

MTU Alum

Posted
Posted

These 2024s have the latest cybersecurity from GM.  There is a central gateway module right behind the serial data port.   It's very difficult to hack the newer trucks.  

rdonarski Enthusiast

rdonarski

Posted
Posted

Cutting into the wiring would be a hard no for me. I did that one time to a new truck and ended up regretting it. 

Handy Enthusiast

Handy

Posted
Posted

I got a new 2024 2500HD last year and was shocked to get full insurance through Costco, American Family Connect, for $310 per six months.  It is less than what they are charging me for my 2013 Tahoe worth 10% of what the Silverado is worth.  I was stunned and told the person they must have made a mistake.  They said no, the rates are lower because of all the safety features on the new trucks.  However, State Farm wanted twice as much money so not all the insurance companies agreed.  The Costco insurance company stopped writing new policies in California last year but I was able to add the new truck because I already had existing policies with them.  I would not add the device your company is suggesting.  My 2005 Silverado was stolen 2 years ago so theft is on my mind.  I decided to just pull the starter fuse in the new truck when I feel at risk.  I also got a Faraday box and bag to protect the key fobs on a suggestion from a post on this site.  In fact, the Faraday bag has allowed me to hide an extra key fob on the truck as a hide-a-key.  I do remote camping in Baja and all this electronic stuff makes me nervous about sudden failure, so the hide-a-key has always been an important backup.

Another JR Senior Enthusiast

Another JR

Posted
Posted (edited)

Foil works just as well as any “Faraday” bag or box. If all you are doing is stashing a key for emergencies foil covered by Saran wrap is fool proof and essentially free. I can understand if you are using the hidden fob regularly you might want to pay for a zipper pouch.  
 

My Toyota fobs have a button push sequence to turn the fob off so it can’t be activated or used by a hacker. I don’t know if the GM fobs have a similar feature. 

Edited by Another JR
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • PunchT37
      Parking Brake - Automatic Engagement Questions

      By PunchT37 · Posted

      I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
    • SoCal Angler
      Parking Brake - Automatic Engagement Questions

      By SoCal Angler · Posted

      2023 GMC 3500 HD, SLE, 6.6L Gas, 4x4, 6 Spd Options:  SLE Convenience Package; Driver Alert Package 1; Spray on Bedliner; X31 Off Road Package; TRAILERING MIRRORS, HEATED POWER -ADJUSTABLE, AUTO DIMMING, WITH TURN INDICATORS WHEELHOUSE LINERS, REAR INC. REAR AXLE - 3.73 RATIO INC. GVWR, 11,350 LBS. (5148 KG) INC. FRONT AND REAR PARK ASSIST, INC. ULTRASONIC     I have been launching my new boat and noticed some things related to the parking brake.. I usually set the parking brake (habit) when on flat ground for typical driving.    When backed down on the launch ramp to launch the boat and I place gear selector into Park, the parking brake activates automatically. My second nature is to set parking brake manually and noticed I was turing the parking brake off.  The parking brake appears to be setting itself automatically.   I looked all over my owner's manual and only found references to being on an incline and manually setting parking brake, or at times parking brake will be auto engaged, but nothing specific to my situation.    When is the parking brake automatically engaged?  Under what specific circumstances?  Can the auto set parameters be changed?     I like the auto set feature.  It would be nice if always engaged when shifted into Park and released when shifted out of Park (like my wifes 2025 RAV4).   Thanks!    
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...