Jump to content

Which engine - 5.3, 6.2 or 3.0?

Z71RAD88
 Share

Recommended Posts

Z71RAD88 Enthusiast

Z71RAD88

Posted
  • Author
Posted
6 hours ago, Jus Cruisin said:

I'm figuring if I don't like it I'll swap out a little early. I just wish the 6.2l would get warrantied in a timely fashion if they do go south. 

Exactly! The lead time of an engine replacement is what’s keeping me away from the 6.2. 

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

newdude
newdude

Is it though?  I can reset my trip meter and drive 7 miles and get the same result.  That's not an accurate measurement of MPG, what it can achieve in a 7 mile stretch.        

Transient
Transient

I see that you ordered your truck before I was able to post my experience.  Imo, you made the right choice getting the 3.0 Duramax.  I have a 2020 with the 6.2 and lived in San Diego from 2020 to 2023

newdude
newdude

41mi.  Doesn't count.  Show us what you get on a tank or current lifetime MPG, that counts.  

Posted Images

Z71RAD88 Enthusiast

Z71RAD88

Posted
  • Author
Posted
20 hours ago, Transient said:

I see that you ordered your truck before I was able to post my experience.  Imo, you made the right choice getting the 3.0 Duramax.  I have a 2020 with the 6.2 and lived in San Diego from 2020 to 2023.  Diesel prices were either the same or slightly lower than 91 octane.  It's the mpg that makes the difference.  Iirc, Costco is a Top Tier Fuel Diesel provider.  Otherwise, GM recommends getting their additive whenever you fill up.  The current 3.0 produces more torque than the 6.2.  Both engines also use the same trans.  As such, they're very similar in 1/4 mile times (according to TFL Truck).  Best I ever saw in mpg with the 6.2 is 24.4 mpg.  That was a drive from San Diego to Las Vegas with the cruise set at 78mph.  Like you, I was torn on which engine to get.  I have been very happy with the 6.2, but sad that I didn't get the 3.0 (COVID and empty car lots played a factor in my purchase).  The biggest dis/satisfaction factor is how frequently I have to fill the tank.  If I could do it again I'd get the 3.0, but if I had the 3.0 I'd probably say I'd get the 6.2.


thanks! It’s been weeks since I was torn on my engine selection and decided to “split the difference” if you will and going 5.3. 

Transient Senior Enthusiast

Transient

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, Jus Cruisin said:

I'm figuring if I don't like it I'll swap out a little early. I just wish the 6.2l would get warrantied in a timely fashion if they do go south. 

My 6.2 has been flawless.  2020 model year.  That $2,500 upcharge does appear to get you a nice butt kissing though.  Just look at the valve spring replacement plan GM had in place for the 5.3 vs the 6.2.

JeffKirk Enthusiast

JeffKirk

Posted
Posted (edited)

Again, I'm not saying there isn't an elevated chance of an issue with the 6.2, but just took a 1200 mile round trip vacation with the wife and passed countless of them.  Not a single one blown up and sitting on the side of the road...just saying.  And mine ran flawless too.

 

Edited by JeffKirk
Jus Cruisin Enthusiast

Jus Cruisin

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, JeffKirk said:

Again, I'm not saying there isn't an elevated chance of an issue with the 6.2, but just took a 1200 mile round trip vacation with the wife and passed countless of them.  Not a single one blown up and sitting on the side of the road...just saying.  And mine ran flawless too.

 

No question that the vast majority are in fact troublefree but since I've downsized from 3 daily drivers to one, I don't have a fallback driver for weeks and maybe months because the engines are on galactic backorder. Stuff breaks and that's what warranties are for but the repairs should be completed in a timely fashion. 

Z71RAD88 Enthusiast

Z71RAD88

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Just wanted to thank everyone for their thoughts, comments and input. I drove my new pickup home yesterday, which ended up being a 5.3. I was pleasantly surprised how well the 10 speed changes that engine from what I remembered of my 2012. Very smooth shifts on flat ground and it never really felt like it struggled going up some of the small mountain passes on my way back home. Always seem to be in the right gear. 

  • Like 1
PunchT37 Enthusiast

PunchT37

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Z71RAD88 said:

Just wanted to thank everyone for their thoughts, comments and input. I drove my new pickup home yesterday, which ended up being a 5.3. I was pleasantly surprised how well the 10 speed changes that engine from what I remembered of my 2012. Very smooth shifts on flat ground and it never really felt like it struggled going up some of the small mountain passes on my way back home. Always seem to be in the right gear. 

Bought a `25 with the 5.3. Mine has 3.42`s but, not much different than the 3.23`s. Runs well. The 10 speed will continue to shift better as you put miles on it. Mine was a little jerky for a while. It had 5 miles on it when I drove it home. It`s got 3600 on it now. The trans has almost became like butter now.

Z71RAD88 Enthusiast

Z71RAD88

Posted
  • Author
Posted
9 minutes ago, PunchT37 said:

Bought a `25 with the 5.3. Mine has 3.42`s but, not much different than the 3.23`s. Runs well. The 10 speed will continue to shift better as you put miles on it. Mine was a little jerky for a while. It had 5 miles on it when I drove it home. It`s got 3600 on it now. The trans has almost became like butter now.


I did notice that a couple of times and didn’t think too much of it. Mine 8 when I drove it off the lot. 

PunchT37 Enthusiast

PunchT37

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Z71RAD88 said:


I did notice that a couple of times and didn’t think too much of it. Mine 8 when I drove it off the lot. 

 

3 minutes ago, Z71RAD88 said:


I did notice that a couple of times and didn’t think too much of it. Mine 8 when I drove it off the lot. 

Yeah. Mostly 2/3 and 3/4 shift. Lotta 3/4.

Bikerjon Enthusiast

Bikerjon

Posted
Posted
On 3/20/2025 at 8:57 PM, Z71RAD88 said:


thanks! It’s been weeks since I was torn on my engine selection and decided to “split the difference” if you will and going 5.3. 

You made a good choice. I've had 4 5.3L trucks and never had any problems with any of them.

Transient Senior Enthusiast

Transient

Posted
Posted
On 3/24/2025 at 6:40 PM, Bikerjon said:

You made a good choice. I've had 4 5.3L trucks and never had any problems with any of them.

I'm the other end of that.  I've only ever owned 1 5.3.  It didn't survive to 100,000 miles.  2007 Tahoe with DOD.  Life got stuck.  Piston ate the valve.  Truck was 6 months out of warranty.  I was stranded in Laramie, WY with my wife and son.  Ended up trading for a Malibu just so I could get home.  I know the 5.3 and 6.2 are basically the same engine.  It was a tough choice for me to go 6.2 or 3.0.  The deciding factor was what was available in July 2020 when COVID made dealership barren. 

customboss Senior Enthusiast

customboss

Posted
Posted
On 3/3/2025 at 9:29 AM, Z71RAD88 said:

I'm moving forward with a new truck purchase in the next few weeks and struggling to decide which engine to go with. I live in CA and don't tow. Typically drive 20,000 per year. My typical commute is 35 miles each way with 90% country roads at 55 mph and freeway at 65 mph, a combo of the two. I do get up the mountains frequently so the extra torque from the 6.2 and 3.0 appease me. I do understand having the turbo will be helpful at elevation compare to a NA engine. 

 

I was initially all set on the 6.2 but with the recent notice from NHTSA, It's got me thinking twice. 

 

Never owned a diesel and don't feel overly confident I can feed it the proper/required diesel living in California. 

 

What would you all go with? Trim level wise going RST or LTZ. Deals seem to be better on the LTZ with the 3.0. 

https://www.gm-trucks.com/nhtsa-investigates-chevrolet-silverado-gmc-sierra-l87-6-2l-v8-engines-for-potential-failure/

Z71RAD88 Enthusiast

Z71RAD88

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 hours ago, customboss said:

https://www.gm-trucks.com/nhtsa-investigates-chevrolet-silverado-gmc-sierra-l87-6-2l-v8-engines-for-potential-failure/


yes, thank you. End up going LTZ with 5.3. Very happy so far after a week or so of ownership. Much different driving experience than my last 5.3 with 6 speed. Averaging 18.5-19 mpg going to and from work with one stretch of straight highway at 70 mpg for 22.1 once arriving to the office. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,716 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • asilverblazer
      Transmission Woes :-(

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • asilverblazer
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • Chuck FB
      summer road trips in the 2026 2500HD

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Aimatdeer
      Ac not keeping up

      By Aimatdeer · Posted

      Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • CamGTP
      Gas Prices

      By CamGTP · Posted

      Paid $2.72 for E85 today.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...