Jump to content

Which engine - 5.3, 6.2 or 3.0?

Z71RAD88
 Share

Recommended Posts

Z71RAD88 Enthusiast

Z71RAD88

Posted
  • Author
Posted
6 hours ago, Jus Cruisin said:

I'm figuring if I don't like it I'll swap out a little early. I just wish the 6.2l would get warrantied in a timely fashion if they do go south. 

Exactly! The lead time of an engine replacement is what’s keeping me away from the 6.2. 

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

newdude
newdude

Is it though?  I can reset my trip meter and drive 7 miles and get the same result.  That's not an accurate measurement of MPG, what it can achieve in a 7 mile stretch.        

Transient
Transient

I see that you ordered your truck before I was able to post my experience.  Imo, you made the right choice getting the 3.0 Duramax.  I have a 2020 with the 6.2 and lived in San Diego from 2020 to 2023

newdude
newdude

41mi.  Doesn't count.  Show us what you get on a tank or current lifetime MPG, that counts.  

Posted Images

Z71RAD88 Enthusiast

Z71RAD88

Posted
  • Author
Posted
20 hours ago, Transient said:

I see that you ordered your truck before I was able to post my experience.  Imo, you made the right choice getting the 3.0 Duramax.  I have a 2020 with the 6.2 and lived in San Diego from 2020 to 2023.  Diesel prices were either the same or slightly lower than 91 octane.  It's the mpg that makes the difference.  Iirc, Costco is a Top Tier Fuel Diesel provider.  Otherwise, GM recommends getting their additive whenever you fill up.  The current 3.0 produces more torque than the 6.2.  Both engines also use the same trans.  As such, they're very similar in 1/4 mile times (according to TFL Truck).  Best I ever saw in mpg with the 6.2 is 24.4 mpg.  That was a drive from San Diego to Las Vegas with the cruise set at 78mph.  Like you, I was torn on which engine to get.  I have been very happy with the 6.2, but sad that I didn't get the 3.0 (COVID and empty car lots played a factor in my purchase).  The biggest dis/satisfaction factor is how frequently I have to fill the tank.  If I could do it again I'd get the 3.0, but if I had the 3.0 I'd probably say I'd get the 6.2.


thanks! It’s been weeks since I was torn on my engine selection and decided to “split the difference” if you will and going 5.3. 

Transient Senior Enthusiast

Transient

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, Jus Cruisin said:

I'm figuring if I don't like it I'll swap out a little early. I just wish the 6.2l would get warrantied in a timely fashion if they do go south. 

My 6.2 has been flawless.  2020 model year.  That $2,500 upcharge does appear to get you a nice butt kissing though.  Just look at the valve spring replacement plan GM had in place for the 5.3 vs the 6.2.

JeffKirk Enthusiast

JeffKirk

Posted
Posted (edited)

Again, I'm not saying there isn't an elevated chance of an issue with the 6.2, but just took a 1200 mile round trip vacation with the wife and passed countless of them.  Not a single one blown up and sitting on the side of the road...just saying.  And mine ran flawless too.

 

Edited by JeffKirk
Jus Cruisin Enthusiast

Jus Cruisin

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, JeffKirk said:

Again, I'm not saying there isn't an elevated chance of an issue with the 6.2, but just took a 1200 mile round trip vacation with the wife and passed countless of them.  Not a single one blown up and sitting on the side of the road...just saying.  And mine ran flawless too.

 

No question that the vast majority are in fact troublefree but since I've downsized from 3 daily drivers to one, I don't have a fallback driver for weeks and maybe months because the engines are on galactic backorder. Stuff breaks and that's what warranties are for but the repairs should be completed in a timely fashion. 

Z71RAD88 Enthusiast

Z71RAD88

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Just wanted to thank everyone for their thoughts, comments and input. I drove my new pickup home yesterday, which ended up being a 5.3. I was pleasantly surprised how well the 10 speed changes that engine from what I remembered of my 2012. Very smooth shifts on flat ground and it never really felt like it struggled going up some of the small mountain passes on my way back home. Always seem to be in the right gear. 

  • Like 1
PunchT37 Enthusiast

PunchT37

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Z71RAD88 said:

Just wanted to thank everyone for their thoughts, comments and input. I drove my new pickup home yesterday, which ended up being a 5.3. I was pleasantly surprised how well the 10 speed changes that engine from what I remembered of my 2012. Very smooth shifts on flat ground and it never really felt like it struggled going up some of the small mountain passes on my way back home. Always seem to be in the right gear. 

Bought a `25 with the 5.3. Mine has 3.42`s but, not much different than the 3.23`s. Runs well. The 10 speed will continue to shift better as you put miles on it. Mine was a little jerky for a while. It had 5 miles on it when I drove it home. It`s got 3600 on it now. The trans has almost became like butter now.

Z71RAD88 Enthusiast

Z71RAD88

Posted
  • Author
Posted
9 minutes ago, PunchT37 said:

Bought a `25 with the 5.3. Mine has 3.42`s but, not much different than the 3.23`s. Runs well. The 10 speed will continue to shift better as you put miles on it. Mine was a little jerky for a while. It had 5 miles on it when I drove it home. It`s got 3600 on it now. The trans has almost became like butter now.


I did notice that a couple of times and didn’t think too much of it. Mine 8 when I drove it off the lot. 

PunchT37 Enthusiast

PunchT37

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Z71RAD88 said:


I did notice that a couple of times and didn’t think too much of it. Mine 8 when I drove it off the lot. 

 

3 minutes ago, Z71RAD88 said:


I did notice that a couple of times and didn’t think too much of it. Mine 8 when I drove it off the lot. 

Yeah. Mostly 2/3 and 3/4 shift. Lotta 3/4.

Bikerjon Enthusiast

Bikerjon

Posted
Posted
On 3/20/2025 at 8:57 PM, Z71RAD88 said:


thanks! It’s been weeks since I was torn on my engine selection and decided to “split the difference” if you will and going 5.3. 

You made a good choice. I've had 4 5.3L trucks and never had any problems with any of them.

Transient Senior Enthusiast

Transient

Posted
Posted
On 3/24/2025 at 6:40 PM, Bikerjon said:

You made a good choice. I've had 4 5.3L trucks and never had any problems with any of them.

I'm the other end of that.  I've only ever owned 1 5.3.  It didn't survive to 100,000 miles.  2007 Tahoe with DOD.  Life got stuck.  Piston ate the valve.  Truck was 6 months out of warranty.  I was stranded in Laramie, WY with my wife and son.  Ended up trading for a Malibu just so I could get home.  I know the 5.3 and 6.2 are basically the same engine.  It was a tough choice for me to go 6.2 or 3.0.  The deciding factor was what was available in July 2020 when COVID made dealership barren. 

customboss Senior Enthusiast

customboss

Posted
Posted
On 3/3/2025 at 9:29 AM, Z71RAD88 said:

I'm moving forward with a new truck purchase in the next few weeks and struggling to decide which engine to go with. I live in CA and don't tow. Typically drive 20,000 per year. My typical commute is 35 miles each way with 90% country roads at 55 mph and freeway at 65 mph, a combo of the two. I do get up the mountains frequently so the extra torque from the 6.2 and 3.0 appease me. I do understand having the turbo will be helpful at elevation compare to a NA engine. 

 

I was initially all set on the 6.2 but with the recent notice from NHTSA, It's got me thinking twice. 

 

Never owned a diesel and don't feel overly confident I can feed it the proper/required diesel living in California. 

 

What would you all go with? Trim level wise going RST or LTZ. Deals seem to be better on the LTZ with the 3.0. 

https://www.gm-trucks.com/nhtsa-investigates-chevrolet-silverado-gmc-sierra-l87-6-2l-v8-engines-for-potential-failure/

Z71RAD88 Enthusiast

Z71RAD88

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 hours ago, customboss said:

https://www.gm-trucks.com/nhtsa-investigates-chevrolet-silverado-gmc-sierra-l87-6-2l-v8-engines-for-potential-failure/


yes, thank you. End up going LTZ with 5.3. Very happy so far after a week or so of ownership. Much different driving experience than my last 5.3 with 6 speed. Averaging 18.5-19 mpg going to and from work with one stretch of straight highway at 70 mpg for 22.1 once arriving to the office. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,902
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Newest Member
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Joined

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 267 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • davester
      My First Project and GMC has me stumped

      By davester · Posted

      are there any codes? with lots of rust, perhaps disconnect/clean both sides of the connection/examine cable ends (the wires) for corrosion going into the sheath & replace if necessary/reconnect ALL the power AND ground cables between the battery, engine, frame, cab, fuse box and starter charm.li (website) has a no-start diagnostic procedure you can work through to get it working.
    • Chuck FB
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      Its no wonder you've gravitated to the oil types and brands you have in later years after trying certain brands and one being a specialty oil or at least very hard to come by up here and the other would have been a commonly found oil of the era and the vastly different outcomes as a result to using the vehicles in question the same distance for an OCI . It shows what marketing hype can do without actually having the product to back up the claims and that is no different now with the insane claims that are written on the side of a bottle of oil from some of the off the shelf oils.    What has surprised me and I was already finding this out before I bought my truck with the GDI engine, that this newer fancy technology that seemingly would suggest better fuel economy/emissions with this high pressure spray of fuel is not in reality kind at all to the engine or at least the oils life. Yet they insist on claiming long OCI with this technology just like they did with the port or similar type fuel injection systems when in reality its a step back in oil life to have a GDI system.    I think the mistake your making Grumpy is that your not sending your samples to Blackstone and getting the feel good glowing report that you can run it another 1000 or more miles and then send another sample where they say run it yet another 1000 miles and on and on it goes until your sending in something that looks a lot like road tar and then they may suggest you change your oil within the next 1000 miles 😆
    • Chuck FB
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      In the 80's 90's I'd run Honda's 7,500 miles between changes using Red Line HP 5W20 and do it for hundreds of thousands of miles with issues. Back in the day it was an SAE 20 with the HTHS of a SAE 30 and SN add load. It was also very polar. Oxidation VOA was over 120. Besides those motors were SPFI and lean burn tech. I could have likely run it longer but never did.    We had a Toyota bought new I ran on Pennzoil's latest and greatest synthetic of the day with "Penthane". A made up word for a very low dose of PAO. Tried 7,500 mile OCI's in that Group III/VI chemistry and the rings tapped out at 90K. Rocker box wasn't as bad as the one Punch put up but it wasn't good either. Also a SPFI motor.    I'm around 3,750 across the board on these GDI monsters and the oil it tapped out by then usually on TBN/TAN crossover and color. Red Line HP Euro.    The AMSOIL SS brochures tell you to follow the OEM values for the service class but that it can be run up to 25K if monitored. I can't imagine what motor could go that distance and not tap out. I've never owned one.    Yes, I know. Lot's of people do. I'm just not going to be one of them. 
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      I knew a guy in the early 80's that bought a new Monte Carlo and ran it a 100,000 miles without ever changing the filter or the oil. Just kept adding. It looked like that inside.     

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...