Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hi, 

 

A dealer offered to trade my 2024 High Country for a 2026 ZR2.

Mine is heading out of warranty in August. 

 

It has been a perfect truck and planned on keeping it for 7-10 years. I do mostly highway driving and have a 5,500lb jet boat that I tow.

The dealer is offering to beat my current payment and gets me into a new 2026 with a full warranty.

 

Would you consider this or just stay with the High Country.

I would be gaining the 2" lift, better shocks, locking diff, HUD and camera rear view mirror.

 

I would be losing the Cadillac like comfort of my HC, moonroof, wood trim, and I am thinking an extra speaker in the dash.

 

Both are diesel and has the same options plus or minus the ones listed above.

 

I am just concerned how the ZR2 is for highway driving and driving in the rain. The HC has been flawless.

 

 

Edited by gregus73
Posted

Tires determine how they drive on the highway and in the rain. Being lifted by 2in means really nothing here when it's just bombing down the freeway.

 

Good chance that your current truck runs all season passenger truck tires of some sort and the ZR2 is going to run a minimum a C rated or even an E rated LT truck tire. They will be heavier, likely louder and have an offroad tread to them. All of those things can make a ride worse feeling is some cases if you are so used to riding in luxury. Most name brand offroad tires are just fine in the rain until maybe half tread, then you might notice them being easier to spin with enough power in the wet.

 

Also expect less fuel mileage in the ZR2 with the suspension and tires. 

Posted

The young me would do the deal. The older me would keep the HC, possibly buying extended warranty. 

Posted
12 hours ago, gregus73 said:

Hi, 

 

A dealer offered to trade my 2024 High Country for a 2026 ZR2.

Mine is heading out of warranty in August. 

 

It has been a perfect truck and planned on keeping it for 7-10 years. I do mostly highway driving and have a 5,500lb jet boat that I tow.

The dealer is offering to beat my current payment and gets me into a new 2026 with a full warranty.

 

Would you consider this or just stay with the High Country.

I would be gaining the 2" lift, better shocks, locking diff, HUD and camera rear view mirror.

 

I would be losing the Cadillac like comfort of my HC, moonroof, wood trim, and I am thinking an extra speaker in the dash.

 

Both are diesel and has the same options plus or minus the ones listed above.

 

I am just concerned how the ZR2 is for highway driving and driving in the rain. The HC has been flawless.

 

 

 

Nope.

 

Doesn't matter if the dealer is "beating your payment". I'm guessing the term is getting extended, and you just took a 2-year thrashing on depreciation on your High Country. You're likely not saving any money, just prolonging the pain. ZR2's are, IMO, are a ridiculously overpriced 1500 trim.

 

The ZR2 tow rating is down from the regular Silverado because of the lift. Taller entry/exit, IMO less comfortable for everyday driving. And while driving in the rain wouldn't worry me, driving in mixed snow conditions would as the ZR2 on has selectable lockers, no G80/ limited slip. You're either running the lockers or not, and those are for offroad use only.

 

Now, I'm biased for the 3.0 diesel. It's a great engine, but it's not something that would make me switch from a V8 that's served me well and is only 2 years old.

Posted

What drives you—emotions or reason?

 

Let’s say you hadn’t received this offer from the dealer, who is driven by reason. Was trading your current truck part of your plan anyway? If not, there’s your answer.  

 

On the other hand we live only once so ... 🙂 

Posted (edited)

Thanks for the replies. It would be for 2500 ZR2.

My wife thinks the extended warranty makes most sense.

I am still waiting for their quote on the gasser ZR2 as well.

 

The dealer approached me with the temptation of something shiny and new, with a new warranty. I test drove the gasser and diesel ZR2s yesterday for grins, with no intention of mailing an immediate deal. I also have reservations about losing MPG, if I were to go with the gas. 
On the plus side of gas, no more yearly emissions tests, def or expensive services.

 

Yea, I would lose ground for owning the vehicle 2 and a half years and start over with a new payment. Not fun.
 

I am on my second diesel and love the Duramax engines. I am hesitant about the 6.6 gas.

The driving experience on the 6.6 gas was very different. The Duramax does seem to have more get up and go. The gas was peppy, just different. I am only towing 5500-6000lbs so do not need the diesel.

 

 

Edited by gregus73
Posted

I wouldn’t do that deal but if my dealer wanted to trade straight up for another ZR vehicle, the ZR1x I would take that deal haha. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted

I was running it by my nephew, who thinks it is a bad deal too.

i also called insurance and it would run me $40 extra per month for the ZR2. The biggest thing that is holding me back is the miles to empty on the gasser ZR2. I am use to 670-700 miles per tank on the HC diesel. The dealer said 650 per tank on the gas ZR2 and I am calling shenanigans on that.

Posted

I believe you said a gas ZR2 2500? If that is the case, it's BS 100%. I have a gas 2500 and get around 11 in the city. It sure as hell isnt jumping to 18 on the hwy. Most likely, if youre talking hwy MPG, it will get 14. That would put you at 504 a tank.

Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, gregus73 said:

I was running it by my nephew, who thinks it is a bad deal too.

i also called insurance and it would run me $40 extra per month for the ZR2. The biggest thing that is holding me back is the miles to empty on the gasser ZR2. I am use to 670-700 miles per tank on the HC diesel. The dealer said 650 per tank on the gas ZR2 and I am calling shenanigans on that.

 

 

If you are averaging 12mpg on a gas ZR2 HD, x 36 gallons, 432mi total estimated range.  Definitely not 650mi lol.

 

A regular gas HD typically averages 12-14mpg empty driving per tank.  You "could" squeak 15-17mpg on a long highway run.  I'd garner a ZR2 would get 1-2mpg worse across the board because lift (lower aero) and 35" Goodyear Territory MT tires.  

 

A Duramax ZR2 HD, expect a similar loss of 1-2mpg.  

Edited by newdude
  • Like 1
Posted

Monthly payment for insurance tells me you need better money management.

  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, diyer2 said:

Monthly payment for insurance tells me you need better money management.

That depends. Small monthly payments while a lump sum earns interest could cover the small payments amount. One never knows.

Posted

Cheaper to pay yearly, works for me.

Posted

There are lots of use cases for a 2500 instead of a 1500 but I still don't see the value add in a ZR2 package on one unless you're specifically using it off-highway.

 

Another $480 per year for insurance on top of it all is ridiculous. It's still a Chevy pickup.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,826
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Tonwantonga
    Newest Member
    Tonwantonga
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 477 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • What I think you're saying is there is supply here at home, and in Venezuela, and we could ease pricing if only it were favorable to do so.   Well, yes?   But that's not the current market. Supply isn't what could someday exist, if only, it's what producers are willing to produce and sell at a certain price point.   The national price of single family homes would come way down if we'd just slap together a few million homes this summer.   RAM and GPUs would get a lot cheaper if we just set up some factories to produce a bunch more and stopped using it to build out AI data centers.    
    • The turn signal/multifunction switch is faulty.  I've seen a few of these go bad at work.  
    • I am experiecing the same issue, I have gone in the setting and disabled rain sensing function but I am still experiencing this. Whe i use my turn signal they will redomly turn on. Sometime they stay on and others times we swipe 2 or 3 times and stop. Its super anoying, escpecially after a fresh wash. Anyone have any advice? . rain-sensing function, but I am still experiencing this issue Sometimes they stay on, and other times we swipe 2 or 3 times and stop.It's super annoying, especially after a fresh wash.When I use my turn signal, they will randomly turn on. I am experiencing the same issue. I have gone into the settings and disabled the rain sensing function, but I am still experiencing this.
    • If we actually used any significant amount of that source in the USA then I'd agree but we don't. We've had that discussion before. We drill and pump more than we use. Thing is, we sell. We export. Gas and Crude. It's more profitable so any shortage here is self inflicted and LEGAL.    I worked a gas plant that has multiple fuel sources available and I worked in the furnace and boiler plant in that facility. I'd had days we swapped fuel types four times in a twelve hour shift which isn't done on supply but on margin. Two of the fuel sources are internally generated. Tail gas and DAK, both of which are sold as well a consumed. We always had more than we needed to run the process but we chose the fuel that produced the best margin not bought at the cheapest price always. A good bit of math to that and back in the time that was done on a slide rule.     I worked the Shale Oil Semiworks of Chevron Research and CONOCO Research in Salt Lake City. That process never went into production although it was very successful. Why? Did we lack oil bearing shale? Nope. Price of crude never made the margins work. That was in the late 70's early 80's. Remember history? What was happening then was a reaction to that situation. It didn't drive it. If so then it's easy. This isn't a supply and demand thing. This is a profit and margin thing and AI rules that now.    In no refining situation that I was ever in would a bomb hitting a well anywhere in the world 'instantly' interrupt or even distress the supply. Most plants have more than a months worth of crude in the tank field and more in pumping stations. That yo-yo could play out over days, weeks and maybe months and have zero impact on plant operations. How many times has this been off and on in the last few months? These people and not stupid. These plants measure down time in hundreds of thousands of dollars per day. They are not sucking fumes or waiting on the next truckload with baited breath. Besides, as I noted, they are for the most part 'vertically integrated'. They own it from the dirt is sits in to the delivery rack and sometimes to the pump. It has a HUGE shock absorber built in. When production suffers, refining wins and when refining is winning exploration is killing. The rest of that crap in the news is a 'news cycle'. Government dipping in to reserves? Oil is stealing their milk money. There's a reason Chevron abandon Venezuela infrastructure and it had nothing to do with security of US citizens. Nationals run those plants. it has to do with MARGINS disappearing to corruption. They are in no hurry to return. Is there supply there? Oh yea. More than enough to offset what is bought in the middle east. Just isn't ???? Profitable.    We have supply. There are places in Illinois you can drive a pipe into the ground and run your homes natural gas furnace on it.    A refinery fire will gum up the supply works but not a localized war where the market is using a limited supply from. Now Europe, that's something other....
    • $4.00 a gallon here now.   Diesel nearly $5.00 again.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...