Jump to content

Gm Posts $1.33 Billion Profit


P71_CrownVic

Recommended Posts

Posted
DETROIT – General Motors Co. said Thursday it made $1.33 billion in the second quarter, a sign it's getting healthier as it prepares to sell stock to the public.

 

It was the second straight quarterly profit for GM, which made $865 million in the first quarter.

 

CEO Ed Whitacre said last week that the company is eager to sell shares in an initial public offering so it can end its dependence on the government and pay off $43.3 billion in bailout funds that were converted into a majority stake in the company.

 

Whitacre said the company plans to file paperwork in the near future for the IPO. But it's unclear if the recent record of profits — $2.2 billion for the first half of 2010 — is enough to convince investors. GM lost $88 billion in the five years before it filed for bankruptcy protection last June.

 

GM's second-quarter revenue totaled $33.2 billion, up 5.3 percent from the first quarter on growing sales in every region except Europe. In the U.S., GM saw strong sales of new and redesigned models like the Chevrolet Equinox wagon and Buick LaCrosse sedan.

 

GM said it earned $2.55 per share for the quarter. GM didn't report second-quarter results last year because it spent part of the quarter in bankruptcy protection, but on Thursday, GM said it lost $12.9 billion in the second quarter of 2009, or $21.12 per share.

 

So far, GM's results are a reversal of fortune from 2009, when it lost $4.3 billion from July 10, the day it exited bankruptcy court, through Dec. 31. Before the first-quarter results, GM hadn't reported a profit since the second quarter of 2007.

 

GM said it ended the quarter with $32.5 billion in cash, down from $36 billion in the first quarter.

 

GM has been working to streamline operations and slash costs. It has shed four brands, changed leadership and last week announced its U.S. dealership network would number 4,500, about 25 percent smaller than it was in early 2009.

 

But it still faces hurdles. GM's U.S. sales rose 14 percent in the first six months of this year compared to the same period in 2009, according to AutoData Corp. That was slightly less than the average industry increase of 17 percent. GM had the highest incentive spending of any major automaker at $3,691 per vehicle, almost $1,000 more than the industry average, according to Edmunds.com.

 

GM has also relied heavily on sales to rental-car, government and corporate fleets, which are less profitable than sales to individual customers. Retail sales — or sales to individuals — were up 11 percent industry wide through June, but up only 1 percent at GM.

 

GM is the last of the Detroit automakers to report second-quarter results. Ford Motor Co. made $2.6 billion, its fifth straight quarterly profit. Chrysler Group LLC, which got $15.5 billion in federal aid, narrowed its second-quarter loss to $172 million.

 

The U.S. government has owned a 61 percent stake in GM since the company left bankruptcy protection.

 

"We want the government out. Period," Whitacre said during an auto conference in northern Michigan. "We don't want to be known as Government Motors."

 

GM has already paid $6.7 billion in government loans. Whitacre said GM wants to sell its stock all at once, rather than in batches, which would end the government's ownership more quickly.

 

But the U.S. government and GM's other stakeholders — a United Auto Workers health-care trust, which owns 17.5 percent of the company; the Canadian government, which owns 11.7 percent; and old bondholders, who own 9.8 percent — will ultimately decide how much of their equity to sell.

 

A GM IPO could be the largest such sale in U.S. history. It would have to bring in $70 billion to pay back all of GM's stakeholders; some analysts expect the IPO will be worth at least than much. That would be more than Ford's market value of roughly $44 billion, but less than the total value of Toyota's shares of about $113 billion.

 

It would also dwarf a 2008 offering by Visa Inc. that netted nearly $18 billion.

 

GM is taking steps to boost its U.S. sales. In July the company said it would buy AmeriCredit Corp., an automotive financing company that serves the subprime market, for $3.5 billion. Though it was partners with Ally Financial Inc., formerly known as GMAC, GM previously lacked a so-called captive financing company, which can offer better rates to customers than outside financial sources.

 

GM also has several new vehicles in the pipeline. Its new Chevrolet Cruze, due out next month, is GM's latest bid to make a desirable — and profitable — small car. Later this year, the company will begin selling the Chevrolet Volt, a $41,000 electric car with a small gas engine that extends its range.

 

SUCK ON THAT HATERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Link-Yahoo

 

Now the Volt isn't bothering me as much. The loans are paid off, money is pouring in, and great, class leading products are being developed.

 

I think GM shed a lot of the Volt development costs in C. 11...

Posted
SUCK ON THAT HATERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Link-Yahoo

 

Now the Volt isn't bothering me as much. The loans are paid off, money is pouring in, and great, class leading products are being developed.

 

I think GM shed a lot of the Volt development costs in C. 11...

 

the Only Gripe I have about the volt is that the Nation as a whole won't see it until 2012! basically ,the Tree Hugging States get it first, and the rest of the nation gets screwed for 2 years!

Posted

I am not sold on pure electric or hybrid vehicles. They may save you some gas but really don't save much if any money. One cost most people never think about is battery replacement. Every battery has a usable lifespan so someone is going to get stuck with a nice little bill at some point. It may not be an issue for the original owner depending on how often they trade but it will be for someone. I am more impressed with cars like the new Fiesta. It returns near Hybrid MPG at a lower cost and with known technology. I truly believe there is still hope for and a future with the good old internal combustion engine. I hope GM shares this sentiment. I am probably in the minority though. :fume:

Posted

It's progress but they still have a ways to go. As for the volt, let the tree hugging states have it first. I have my truck and I'm eyeballing a new camaro. Makes no difference to me.

Posted

nice. too bad whitacre is stepping down in september. i like his attitude and hes done a good job bringing the company back on track.

Posted
It's progress but they still have a ways to go. As for the volt, let the tree hugging states have it first. I have my truck and I'm eyeballing a new camaro. Makes no difference to me.

 

 

 

 

Looks like you feel the same way I do lol!

Posted

Sorry folks.

 

The stats are just not there.

 

The actual sales increase for consumer buyers was a measely 1% over last year sales.

 

The claimed sales were . . . you guessed it to fleet sales (Rental car companies) and to . . . government sales (fleet).

 

Not as good of news - once you get into the nitty gritty of the sales figures.

Posted
SUCK ON THAT HATERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Link-Yahoo

 

Now the Volt isn't bothering me as much. The loans are paid off, money is pouring in, and great, class leading products are being developed.

 

I think GM shed a lot of the Volt development costs in C. 11...

 

the Only Gripe I have about the volt is that the Nation as a whole won't see it until 2012! basically ,the Tree Hugging States get it first, and the rest of the nation gets screwed for 2 years!

 

 

I think of it this way: let the tre hugger get it first and pay the big $$$ for it, then by the time it gets to the rest of the nation, hopefully the tech will have been paid for and the price will have come down somewhat :thumbs:

Posted
Sorry folks.

 

The stats are just not there.

 

The actual sales increase for consumer buyers was a measely 1% over last year sales.

 

The claimed sales were . . . you guessed it to fleet sales (Rental car companies) and to . . . government sales (fleet).

 

Not as good of news - once you get into the nitty gritty of the sales figures.

 

GM didn't rely on fleet sales NEARLY as much as Ford and Chrysler did from January to July...

 

Fleet as percentage of U.S. sales, Jan. through July

 

Chrysler Group 39%

Ford Motor 35%

General Motors 31%

Hyundai brand 16%

Nissan North America 15%*

Toyota Motor Sales 9%

American Honda 2%*

Posted
"SUCK ON THAT HATERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

 

You my friend, need a life. Only person who is a hater on this forum, is you.

 

I'm not a hater...I like GM. And I do have a life...kthxbye.

Posted
Sorry folks.

 

The stats are just not there.

 

The actual sales increase for consumer buyers was a measely 1% over last year sales.

 

The claimed sales were . . . you guessed it to fleet sales (Rental car companies) and to . . . government sales (fleet).

 

Not as good of news - once you get into the nitty gritty of the sales figures.

 

It is actually a very bad report with lots of lipstick on the pig when you crunch the numbers. Actually, it is another big loss when you factor in billions spent to make the 1.33 billion. Until GM can purchase back GMAC there will be no big turnaround. The main reason Ford is posting big number is because they still own FMC & are financing more less than prime customers that GMAC is turning down. GM has no control over GMAC & it is costing them big. GM just purchased another finance company but it is not the long term solution or even a short term solution at this time as they are not loaning yet.

 

The good news, this is going to push the stock price down if they decide to pull the trigger sooner than later. There is talk of it being delayed with the poor results we are seeing now. I will be a buyer when the right entry point is reached. GM & Ford stock have made me some good money over the years.

 

"The federal government got a 61 percent stake in GM in exchange for $43 billion in aid to keep it alive."

 

How much of this 1.33 Billion was made as interest and investments off the goberment hand out of $43 billion it recieved and has yet to pay back?

 

 

^

 

Answer that, Mr. GM.

Posted
Answer that, Mr. GM.

 

The Government bought something with money. What a crazy concept!

 

Sell your Caddy and buy a Navigator troll.

 

How come you have decided to not login under your "Punmax" username??

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I was using recirc/max air. Especially if it really hot i start out by lowering the front windows a little with regular ac the go to recirculation after a few and rolling windows up. And it does not have the newest refrigerant. It has per the info under the hood r134. Not the new r1234yf.  
    • tldr; Shade tree mechanic stumped by variable displacement AC compressor.   Not Silverado related, but for my 2000 Camaro SS. I've never really used the AC since acquiring the car a good handful of years ago. I plan to take it on a trip this summer so I wanted to make sure the AC was in good shape. On an 73 degree day in the shop with the car idling I set the AC on "Max", temp set to cold, and fan on hi. The compressor turned on and air turned nice and cold.   I let it run for several minutes but noticed the compressor never cycled off. The engine was up to temperature enough that it began cycling the cooling fans on high. I had a set of manifold gauges hooked up and it was consistently at about 25 psi on the low side and between 200 and 225 psi (warm engine) on the high side. Per temperature charts, the low side is low (should be 30-35) and the high side is a little high (up to 170 per chart). I read the low pressure as potentially being under-charged underscored by a continually running compressor This was also underscored by temp readings of mid-20 degrees at the vents. Not just cold, freezing cold. Switching off the AC but leaving the HVAC fan on high produced a deluge of condensation underneath the vehicle. I was getting ice buildup on the evap core most likely.   The low reading (25psi) concerned me that the compressor wasn't switching off so I swapped out the pressure switch. No change in behavior, still ran constantly.   The AC clutch works fine as it engages/disengages with the HVAC switch on command. The compressor relay is good as I swapped it with two different known good relays just to be sure. Having eliminated that, and the pressure switch, I added refrigerant, thinking the constant run and low "low" pressure were signs of a slight undercharge. Makes sense, the car is 26 years old and it doesn't appear the AC system has ever been touched.   Adding some R134a didn't meaningfully change the low side pressure. And that's when a lightbulb flashed upstairs. While I consider the car "old", it's possibly "new" enough to have a variable displacement compressor. Did some reading and sure enough. Dangit. I don't work on these for this reason.   Adding refrigerant means the compressor will just compensate and won't really change pressures until it's severely overcharged or undercharged. But at least I wasn't getting ice/frost anymore, but instead high 30 degree temps out of the vents. That's more normal, but with variable displacement now I have no idea where my charge level is at. It's probably overcharged now. The high side even with the engine radiating serious heat was never really over about 225.   The static pressure at room temperature is dead on, before and after the charge. Both high/low equalize after some rest.   I'm thinking I'll need to take it to a shop. I want the proper charge level so I'm not working the compressor too hard. The only way to get an accurate charge is to evacuate and then re-charge with the exact amount specified for the system -- at least that's what I'm reading.   Anyone here with modern automotive AC knowledge?  
    • Mine is in the shop for the AC now. While it did get cold after a bit, it would take a while to even start to cool the air at all. Turns out the compressor was bad and cycling. 
    • I call B.S. when I first moved to Texas my first house would only cool to 80 with the Texas heat. The AC tech said it was normal at 100 degrees outside. I remodeled the house put in a new AC. I could hang meat. My cars may need recirculating to start. Once moving it switches to regular AC and I could hang meat. Living in Texas no one would put up with only 20 degrees difference. 
    • AC in home or auto only cool down 15-25 degrees from outside temp, but what will help is to put the ac in recirc mode this will recirc the Inside cabin air rather then trying to cool down the outside hot air, I always have mine in recirc mode.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...