Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Don't get your nylons in a knot - I misunderstood your question! GEESH ....

 

 

BUT .. headers are inherently going to make the vehicle louder, so ....

 

I'm familiar with headers on many applications and in general I like the throaty visceral exhaust note they make.

 

It's the L9H with VVT that was said to make more "mechanical noises" that I am concerned with.

 

Typical stock manifolds help isolate these sounds on any vehicle and headers make these sounds more noticeable on any vehicle.

 

With the added complexity of VVT it seems plausible that extra valvetrain noise could be present and made more noticeable with long tube headers.

 

I'm asking if anyone that owns an L9H with long tube headers can tell me if there truck has more mechanical noise than a non VVT truck?

Posted

I just intalled my headers last night and as far as mechanical noise I don't really notice anything more then the normal header noise. It almost sounds like an axhaust leak but it is not. I want to describe it as a tinny sound. Not very noticeable unless you know that truck very well. I had a set of LT Headers on a half ton silverado with the throttle body 350 and the mechanical sound or header tick is no different on this truck then the old 350.

 

I have a corsa system with ARH LT headers and no Cats. At highway speeds of 60 to 70 in the cab there is no noticeable difference in sound level. The second you give any throttle it is loud. I thought I had a window open in the back of the truck it was so loud. It is very controllable though. It sounds just slightly louder then stock at idle or easlily driving around town but will wake the enitre neighborhood up if you really lay into it.

 

I have had the Corsa system for a while now with the stock manifolds and cats and was very dissapointed in the sound level. The system was very high quality and installed supe easy, but the stock exhaust system was louder. At wide open throttle it had a little more noise level but not enough for me. I no longer have that problem.

 

The headers went on very smoothly and fit perfectly. No fitment issues at all. If anyone else is doing this, remove the passenger side inner fenderwell and your life will be much easier. Driver side there is no need to remove. I had to cut the old "Y" pipe out. I just could not see anyway to get it out without removing the cross member.

Posted

I just intalled my headers last night and as far as mechanical noise I don't really notice anything more then the normal header noise. It almost sounds like an axhaust leak but it is not. I want to describe it as a tinny sound. Not very noticeable unless you know that truck very well. I had a set of LT Headers on a half ton silverado with the throttle body 350 and the mechanical sound or header tick is no different on this truck then the old 350.

 

I have a corsa system with ARH LT headers and no Cats. At highway speeds of 60 to 70 in the cab there is no noticeable difference in sound level. The second you give any throttle it is loud. I thought I had a window open in the back of the truck it was so loud. It is very controllable though. It sounds just slightly louder then stock at idle or easlily driving around town but will wake the enitre neighborhood up if you really lay into it.

 

I have had the Corsa system for a while now with the stock manifolds and cats and was very dissapointed in the sound level. The system was very high quality and installed supe easy, but the stock exhaust system was louder. At wide open throttle it had a little more noise level but not enough for me. I no longer have that problem.

 

The headers went on very smoothly and fit perfectly. No fitment issues at all. If anyone else is doing this, remove the passenger side inner fenderwell and your life will be much easier. Driver side there is no need to remove. I had to cut the old "Y" pipe out. I just could not see anyway to get it out without removing the cross member.

Thanks for the summary and opinion. Did you tune after install? Can you feel the power gain from the install?

Posted

I bet so. The increase is very noticeable in my car it's great

 

 

Ryan

Posted

I just put a Black Bear tune in my truck a few weeks ago and that made a very noticeable difference. With the headers there is a very noticeable difference in how quick the motor revs. The truck feels like it has a lot more low end torque. It doesn't shift out of 6th nearly as often as it did before. I have only put about 100 miles on it so far.

 

I will be getting an updated tune from Black Bear soon to account for the headers and no Cats. Oddly I don't have any check engine lights on yet. I have to assume I will. Does it take time for the computer to figure out what is going on.

 

I will post once I get the updated tune installed. My dad has almost the same truck I do with a 6.2 but it is an extended cab. I am looking forward to doing a side by side comparison. His truck is totally stock. Mine has a 2" leveling kit and 285 tires. I am hoping to see a big difference between the two trucks.

Posted

It took mine a few days to get a CeL

 

 

Ryan

Posted

I have a question regarding the stock exhaust on my 2010 GMC Sierra 6.2L. When I drive up an incline and under acceleration I have this whistling/whining noise that happens every so often and didn't know if this was something normal or if I need to look into getting something replaced. Stock exhaust sounds great and there isn't much I would change, but have been looking at some of the forums and debating between the Corsa and the Borla if this could be something needing repair or replacing.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I have a question regarding the stock exhaust on my 2010 GMC Sierra 6.2L. When I drive up an incline and under acceleration I have this whistling/whining noise that happens every so often and didn't know if this was something normal or if I need to look into getting something replaced. Stock exhaust sounds great and there isn't much I would change, but have been looking at some of the forums and debating between the Corsa and the Borla if this could be something needing repair or replacing.

i have the borla dual exhaust and i have always gotten compliments. a little bit of buyers remorse as i do like the sound of the corsa systems. my friend has an escalade and he put in a flow master and a borla tip. that sounds pretty nice too. there is a lot of excess weight and it is cleaner with aftermarkets. just to note my exhaust is quiet to me when i am driving, yet my wife gives me shit as she says she can hear me a mile away! :)

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Just an update on my Header install. I have put about 1000 miles on it so far with the AR LT Headers and updated Black Bear Tune. I also just got back from a trip towing my Jeep and 2 atv's on my car trailer. Total weight of truck and trailer was just under 14,000lbs. Truck can hold 6th gear way better and pulls much, much better. I also averaged just a little over 10 miles to the gallon. I pulled the same load to Colorado and back in August before I made any modifcations and averaged just under 9 mpg. My truck does not have the Max Tow option so I only have 3.42 gears.

 

The only problem I have now is the trucks rear springs are not heavy enough to handle the weight. I am almost on the bump stops when I get teh load where I need it for the truck to handle correct. Has any one installed helper airbags to help with this problem?

Posted (edited)

Airbags are where it's at - you will love them. I've got the Firestone RideRite 2430. My springs would sag with just me standing on the tailgate, and now I can throw a 2,400 lb. pallet of coal in the back and keep the truck dead level.

 

Normal driving I only keep 4-5 psi in them. With my weight distribution hitch for my flatbed car hauler, I normally never change that setting. I think a weight distributing hitch would be a better way to go, especially if you tow a lot. It changes the handling unbelievably, and it will level the truck out as well. Towing feels like your driving a straight job. Feels like the trailer is welded to your truck's frame.

Edited by Jsdirt
Posted

IMG 20150802 160023207 HDR

 

I don't mind the way it handles the load I just really hate how it looks and all the headlights flashing me when I meet cars at night.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Need advice : my 2010 Yukon has the 6.2 and it has sticky lifters. Is this issue typically specific lifters or any of them could go bad? Got the dealer to flip the bill to go in and fix the bad ones but they offered to put in new lifters at cost of parts for the ones that are not bad as preventative maintenance. They said the parts numbers are different so I hope it's an improved and fixed replacement. Just not sure if I should bite on $4-500 out of my pocket for finishing off the lifters the aren't sticking. Thanks for any help.

Posted

I bet neither Lincoln you own ever had this problem! Total joke manufacturing is these days. It's not enough to spend $40 LARGE on a truck - they have to throw sh** parts in it that fail 5 years (or less) in. What a world ...

 

If it were me, I would leave the thing alone, and drive it until it grenades - then, I'd throw in a long block built by a reputable engine builder. That engine will last just about forever. I wouldn't spend one more dime at GM for the same crap quality parts.

 

Just my humble .02 ....

Posted

Yeah I'm on the fence over this. They found 3 bulletins on this issue. Tearing down the engine to do this is nuts on a $60,000 SUV new. Granted I didn't buy it new but I'm still surprised to see such a "reliable" engine have this issue. And it's very common. Surprised GM is still selling trucks with these engines. Wait; now they are EcoTechs! Vortec is dead so now everything must be all better.

  • Like 1
Posted

That's what infuriates me about GM. The engine by itself is bulletproof, and the block & lower end is stronger than the old 350's of the day, but then they go and throw substandard lifters in ... and top it off with hit-or-miss crap electronics. Can't win today ....

 

I love my engine by itself. Thing makes a ton of power and gets the same mileage as my '94 did -pretty impressive. But then they throw in an unreliable AFM that makes it burn oil. NONE of my cars or trucks in the past have EVER burned oil, even with close to 300k on the clock. Mine started burning at 50k ...

 

My parent's could have bought 3 of their houses for what the average SUV sells for today too. For that kind of money, these things should have the reliability of military aircraft. God knows GM didn't pay $50k a piece to build these things ... :nonod:

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...