Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So do I pledge my power tool allegiance to Craftsman or Dewalt

Posted

So do I pledge my power tool allegiance to Craftsman or Dewalt

Neither, I don't pledge my allegiance to any specific tool manufacturer

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Neither, I don't pledge my allegiance to any specific tool manufacturer

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

I'm saying specifically for the batteries and I don't have to have 8 different chargers

Posted

I mean, they serve different purposes so each battery will have its own charger. How many cordless things do you plan on getting? I believe craftsman has more cordless tools geared towards vehicle maintenance

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Posted

I mean, they serve different purposes so each battery will have its own charger. How many cordless things do you plan on getting? I believe craftsman has more cordless tools geared towards vehicle maintenance

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

I don't necessarily need to get automotive maintenance tools. But I will likely get the drill, impact driver, reciprocating saw, and a couple other things. The impact was wanted to just keep with the truck. The others will be general tools

Posted

I don't necessarily need to get automotive maintenance tools. But I will likely get the drill, impact driver, reciprocating saw, and a couple other things. The impact was wanted to just keep with the truck. The others will be general tools

Craftsman will be cheaper, as far as quality I'm not sure. I'm a Bosch guy myself when it comes to power tools, have had them smoking before and I still use them to this day. If I had the money I'd have Hilti or Milwaukee, but don't need high end tools such as those for no more than I use them

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Posted

I am dewalt guy myself. I have the impact wrench for working on the truck and love it. But I have a ton of there cordless tools being iam an electrician.

Posted (edited)

At the shop today I just sold and programmed 2 FOBs ( CWTWB1U331 ) to a 2006 Ford F150

Edited by Coby7
Posted

Just sold and programmed 2 FOBs ( CWTWB1U331 ) to a 2006 Ford F150

Can you explain why 2 keys with built in fobs for a 2011 f150 have to come together. They are expensive and the dealer won't let you buy just one. We have one. The other is at the bottom of a lake

Posted

Probably to squeeze the maximum out of you. They will probably not program a third party keyfob either or if they do they will charge some ridiculous price. Just get one on ebay or a reputable locksmith.

 

http://www.ebay.ca/itm/NEW-Keyless-Entry-Remote-Key-Fob-3BTN-Panic-For-2011-Ford-F-150-w-Program-Inst-/151768502302?fits=Year%3A2011%7CMake%3AFord%7CModel%3AF-150&hash=item23561b901e:g:ZkEAAOSwd0BVv~F5&vxp=mtr

Posted

Probably to squeeze the maximum out of you. They will probably not program a third party keyfob either or if they do they will charge some ridiculous price. Just get one on ebay or a reputable locksmith.

 

http://www.ebay.ca/itm/NEW-Keyless-Entry-Remote-Key-Fob-3BTN-Panic-For-2011-Ford-F-150-w-Program-Inst-/151768502302?fits=Year%3A2011%7CMake%3AFord%7CModel%3AF-150&hash=item23561b901e:g:ZkEAAOSwd0BVv~F5&vxp=mtr

That says I need another working key to program it. I have one.

Posted (edited)

There you go you'll just need a locksmith to cut it for you.

 

 

Edited by Coby7
Posted

lol my buddy and I went to Del Taco tonight too! Only thing that sucked was the lobby was closed so I was forced to use the drive thru. Also I think only 2 people were working so the wait was quite a bit. Even if I did have a sardine can I'd still hate going through a drive thru, I just don't like being boxed in like that. 98% of the time I get off my fat butt and walk into the lobby.

I don't like people so going thru the drive thru is great for me.

Posted

I like Dewalt, but I have a Craftsman 19.2v cordless drill I got on sale at Kmart, and it is a good drill. I have a Dewalt cordless impact and an electric grinder. Both of those are good too.

Posted

Can you explain why 2 keys with built in fobs for a 2011 f150 have to come together. They are expensive and the dealer won't let you buy just one. We have one. The other is at the bottom of a lake

 

I just watched a Youtube vid where Eric O. at South Main Auto had to delete and reprogram a set of keys on a F-150 - when he got into the programming part in his scan tool, it's instructions listed 2 keys. Insert key 1, stand on your head facing west and whistle, etc ... insert key 2 and repeat. There was no option for doing just one key - could be why.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...