Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Today I got a call from the dealership service departing saying my truck was ready to be picked up. Went to go pick it up and after driving it a few miles got a DING DING DING DING "Service DEF System Now" message and a "99 miles until you're screwed" message. Last time I had those messages, they had to replace the DEF tank. Dealer had performed 2 service regens as I took it in because of DPF regens occurring every 80-120 miles and should be every 400+ miles instead. Yes it gets driven a LOT on the highway, yes I drive it properly and get those EGTs up to help with the diesel particulate filter regeneration. So I drove it for 30 miles on the highway, completed the regen, then headed back to the dealership. Service DEF message went off, check engine light still on. Said screw it, they get to fix it again. So... service shuttle ride back home and waiting to hear from them on the prognosis. They hope to be able to get to the diagnosis today, only 1 diesel mechanic working this week, no problem for me. It's a light week. We'll see. Truck is a 2012 Duramax 2500 with about 74,000 miles.

 

Bah humbug anyway.

Posted (edited)

Just had a no start/no click. Have to diagnose tomorrow

Edited by Chris
Posted

Today I got a call from the dealership service departing saying my truck was ready to be picked up. Went to go pick it up and after driving it a few miles got a DING DING DING DING "Service DEF System Now" message and a "99 miles until you're screwed" message. Last time I had those messages, they had to replace the DEF tank. Dealer had performed 2 service regens as I took it in because of DPF regens occurring every 80-120 miles and should be every 400+ miles instead. Yes it gets driven a LOT on the highway, yes I drive it properly and get those EGTs up to help with the diesel particulate filter regeneration. So I drove it for 30 miles on the highway, completed the regen, then headed back to the dealership. Service DEF message went off, check engine light still on. Said screw it, they get to fix it again. So... service shuttle ride back home and waiting to hear from them on the prognosis. They hope to be able to get to the diagnosis today, only 1 diesel mechanic working this week, no problem for me. It's a light week. We'll see. Truck is a 2012 Duramax 2500 with about 74,000 miles.

 

Bah humbug anyway.

Delete and be done with it.

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Posted

I can't or I would. I live in an area that requires emissions testing. They got it fixed a few hours ago. One of the sensors had DEF fluid that crystallized on it during the service regens. It's actually driving a bit better! However- time will tell if the regen frequency improves. I'm hopeful that GM has smoothed out some of the emissions issues on the 2015/16 and the new 17 models. Time will tell though. Watching the posts closely over at duramaxforum.com

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Nice racket they have there. Just like with DPF filters plugging up every week unless you run the thing full bore every day. More crap that costs us more money, and they can say, "the gov't made us do it".

 

Well, they didn't make you engineer the things so piss-poor that you're guaranteed to make another $5k on top of every sale price for crap components ...

 

Stuff like this drives me nuts. Firstly, it shouldn't be on the vehicle to begin with. Secondly, since it has to be, thanks to the militant enviro movement & their cohorts in this current administration, why not engineer something that works and lasts? They know they have you by the short 'n' curlies - it's the perfect racket.

 

 

Grrrr ....

 

 

Anyway ... got some CV axles installed in that Trooper, but now that it's all apart, I can feel some serious play in the lower ball joints. The uppers are stiff - as in lack of lubrication. Looks like I'll be ordering a set of those here too.

 

Then to top things off, I have to return YET ANOTHER part to Rockauto. DONE with that friggin company!!!! Wrong CV axles, and about 14 other parts I can't recall at the moment ... and then THIS. Same part number on each box ... yet, different shocks. WTF!!!

 

Quality control is so 20th century ... :sick:

 

IMG_6559_zpsajpnuow1.jpg

 

fullsizeoutput_7d6_zpsxjy6dbgw.jpeg

 

fullsizeoutput_7d7_zpsmcpayblp.jpeg

Edited by Jsdirt
Posted (edited)

Same shock only one doesn't have a dust cover. One less thing to rust and fall off.... :crackup:

Edited by Coby7
Posted (edited)

Now the shaft will pit, and wipe the seal out after 5k miles. Another cheapout by a once halfway-decent brand ...

 

Yeah I had meant to say they were the same. They do have different p/n's on the body, but they're exactly the same in every way, except for the box size and dust shield.

 

 

 

 

I refreshed my memory by going on Rockauto's site. Just this year alone, here are my returns:

 

- starter solenoid for '86 Grand Marquis -- welded itself closed and the starter ran away! Warranty return.

 

- receiver/dryer for '93 Volvo 940 A/C -- sent totally WRONG part

 

- transmission filter for same -- sent totally WRONG part

 

- CV axles for Isuzu Trooper -- sent totally WRONG parts

 

- the KYB shock mismatch for same

 

Last year I returned double this amount, and the year before, a few things. They were great 5 years ago. Don't know WTF happened the last 2 years ...

Edited by Jsdirt
Posted

I prefer the rubber boot to the metal ones, really. My Bilstiens are at 50k or so now, and I'm happy with the ride. The rear shocks definitely aren't as pretty as they used to be, getting blasted with gravel will do that. I don't doubt that they've held up better than painted shocks would have, though.

 

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Posted

Yeah I was planning on finding some universal boots for these. At least those won't rust.

Posted

Got another used starter for $50 from a 6.0 Express van. Last starter was from a 5.3. It starts easier now and if I get another 18 months from this one I'll be happy

Posted

I actually cleaned off the tonneau and bed of the truck. It might actually come out and play this weekend for the first time in months. We'll see. :)

 

IMG_6539.jpg?dl=1&_ga=1.268953011.356681

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,914
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    AidenVorpagel
    Newest Member
    AidenVorpagel
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,372 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 286,740 Mile Services   8/6/2026   New AC Compressor. Refrigerant oil and dye, evacuate and charge system.  New exhaust system from cat back.  New Iridium plugs plus replace #3 coil Repair/rewire headlamp wiring (passenger side) and replace all forward bulbs. Polish lenses of both assemblies.  Pull rear rotors, clean and adjust parking assembly. Inspect, clean and grease front calipers. Check pads and shoes.  4 wheel power bleed of brake system. Dot 4 Reset idle speed 50 rpm higher New Serpentine belt.    Will need new pads in the rear in about 5K more miles.    Tax Title and License out the door just short of a grand.    AC clutch had bitten the dust. 1 year warranty on the pick and save replacement. Thing will make a Polar Bear cry Uncle.  He spent quite some time on the wiring. It was in the harness and he does nothing half. I got off cheap. I have considerable more light down the road. Sylvania Silver Star replacements.  Gas seal between the porcelain and shell of plug #3 was blown, cooked the coil. That was the cold miss.  Love the new exhaust. I can sneak into the neighborhood again.  Nice to have a working parking brake again. Belle Tire never got it done. That was disappointing.    This was one of her bigger bills and still way cheaper than a payment even given the oil consumption. This thing cost me under a hundred a month in repairs and normal routine costs. What is my incentive to replace it? 🤔           
    • hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...