Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

I'd give Fabtech a call and see what the difference is between the K1068 kit and the GEN II K1084. Also, check out the prices on this website too they have the GEN II kit for 30% off plus no sales tax and free shipping. Also, when you speak with Fabtech get an estimate install time, they're install instructions do not state one.

Gen 2 doesn't sit as high and doesn't increase track width at all.

 

Sent from my E6853 using Tapatalk

Posted

Gen 2 doesn't sit as high and doesn't increase track width at all.

 

Sent from my E6853 using Tapatalk

 

So GEN II isn't a replacement for the first set of lift kits that they released?

Posted

Hmm, I'm thinking Fabtech isn't the way to go. Here is the difference. I also don't like what that note at the very bottom of the "1068" kit tell you. That CV shaft is $1000 if you need it. It doesn't say that on the other kits. I'm kinda confused now.

 

GEN II System

 

"This new Gen II system retains the factory track width keeping the tires under the fenders for a clean appearance. With the factory track width retained the front Sway Bar utilizes the stock end links and mounting holes keeping the leverage on the bar proper. There are no CV spacers, impact struts or add a leafs required for installation. The front differential is relocated in a manner so that when driving at higher 4 wheel drive speeds vibration is reduced.

The GEN II Basic System utilizes a simplistic upper Coilover spacer that provides lift from the top of the shock rather than bottom up with reduced install time. Rear shocks are Performance Twin Tubes.

All bracketry and the skid plate is constructed of 1/4” thick steel for maximum strength and proven reliability.

This 6” system will level the stance of the vehicle compared to the factory nose down rake. For those customers that want a factory nose down appearance order optional add a leaf, Part # FTS212

The system passes FMVSS 126 standards for stability control functionality as tested by an independent lab.

NOTE- Before ordering visually check your vehicle’s factory suspension for aluminum or steel version. This system will only fit factory aluminum suspension vehicles.

five-sixty-logo-small.png

This system qualifies for our 5/60 Powertrain Warranty. To find out more CLICK HERE

Kit# K1084
  • Use 35/1250R17 tires w/ 17x8 wheels w/ 5” BS w/ minor trimming
  • Use 325/65R18 tires w/ 18x9 wheels w/ 5” BS w/ minor trimming
  • Use 35/1250R20 tires w/ 20x9 wheels w/ 5” BS w/ minor trimming

Oty Part # Description 1 FTS21170 Component Box 1 GEN II 1 FTS21171 Coilover Spacer Kit 1 FTS21172 Component Box 2 GEN II - Aluminum 2 FTS7240 Rear Performance Shock

*FOOTNOTES

1. Will not fit models with Factory AutoRide shocks.
8. Will not fit all wheel drive models.
14. Cannot use OEM wheel and tire.
17. Does not fit standard cab.
127. Fits 2014 models with Factory aluminum suspension only."

and

1068 SYSTEM

"Our 6” Basic System for the factory Aluminum suspension has been designed utilizing our industry leading crossmember and spindle technology.


Lift is accomplished by utilizing the factory front Coilover shocks with steel spacers that helps retain the stock ride of the front suspension. The 1/4” thick steel lower control arm has been formed to fit to the bottom of the 2014 frame without having to cut or modify it for a fast installation. Extensive design work was given to the extended length steering knuckles specifically for the Aluminum component version keeping track width near stock and working properly with the Stablitrac® safety functions.

The front differential is relocated with heavy duty brackets while a tightly formed 1/4 ” thick steel skid plate provides protection for offroad use. The rear suspension is upgraded with add a leafs and 5” tall blocks and u bolts. The stock rear shocks are replaced with Performance shocks for increase dampening.

- Front lower control arm Crossmember forms to bottom of frame without cutting
- Offset ductile Steering Knuckles keep tires under fenders
- Includes Crossmember cross tubes to distribute front suspension impact loads
- No disassembly of factory coilover assembly required for installation
- Systems compatible with factory Stablitrac®

NOTE- Before ordering visually check your vehicle’s factory suspension for aluminum or steel version. This system will only fit factory aluminum suspension vehicles.

five-sixty-logo-small.png

This system qualifies for our 5/60 Powertrain Warranty. To find out more CLICK HERE

Kit# K1068
  • Use 35/1250R17 tires w/ 17x8 wheels w/ 5” BS w/ minor trimming
  • Use 325/65R18 tires w/ 18x9 wheels w/ 5” BS w/ minor trimming
  • Use 35/1250R20 tires w/ 20x9 wheels w/ 5” BS w/ minor trimming

Oty Part # Description 1 FTS21137 Component Box 1 1 FTS21138 Coilover Spacer Kit 1 FTS21139 Component Box 2 - Aluminum 2 FTS7240 Rear Performance Shock

*FOOTNOTES

1. Will not fit models with Factory AutoRide shocks.
8. Will not fit all wheel drive models.
14. Cannot use OEM wheel and tire.
17. Does not fit standard cab.
127. Fits 2014 models with Factory aluminum suspension only.
136. Some vehicles may experience front driveline vibration in 4WD. Order FTS21192 CV Driveshaft Kit if occurs."

Posted

How is the comparison in ride between the GMC and the RAM?

I think the ride is better in the ram. Most likely due to the coil springs in the rear as opposed to leaf springs. However, the seats and overall quality are better in the Sierra. I always feel composed and secure when in my Sierra. I didn't always have that feeling in the ram.

 

I don't regret getting rid of the ram, and I don't regret getting this Sierra at all.

 

Josh

Posted

It almost seems better to get the Zone 6.5" lift... I can get that installed for $800.00 It would be cheaper than the Fabtech. The BDS is $2014 + $800.00 install. It's about $1000 more.

Posted

It almost seems better to get the Zone 6.5" lift... I can get that installed for $800.00 It would be cheaper than the Fabtech. The BDS is $2014 + $800.00 install. It's about $1000 more.

 

I think both the Zone and Fabtech are good options. There's several guys on this forum who have the Fabtech lifts and haven't had any issues. Also if the lift isn't impacting the factory track width then I wouldn't worry about CV's. Needless to say picking a lift kit is freaking difficult when you starting looking at all the details lol.

Posted

Anyone have pics of the width of the stock wheels on a BDS? I know it will widen the track but i just want to see how much. Preferably the silverado 20s.

 

Sent from my Note 4 on Tapashit

Posted (edited)

 

I think both the Zone and Fabtech are good options. There's several guys on this forum who have the Fabtech lifts and haven't had any issues. Also if the lift isn't impacting the factory track width then I wouldn't worry about CV's. Needless to say picking a lift kit is freaking difficult when you starting looking at all the details lol.

 

Zone is made by BDS from what i have heard? I've never owned a lifted truck, just leveling kits on the last 4 of them. It's very difficult.

 

Edited by Swankster988
Posted

 

I think both the Zone and Fabtech are good options. There's several guys on this forum who have the Fabtech lifts and haven't had any issues. Also if the lift isn't impacting the factory track width then I wouldn't worry about CV's. Needless to say picking a lift kit is freaking difficult when you starting looking at all the details lol.

 

Also, that 1068 kit by Fabtech must be doing something if they had to put a note about vibration issues with that system, the fix they have is a different CV for $1000 which kind of tells me to avoid that kit because there is a known issue. It seems they then designed the GEN II kit which doesn't have that issue and doesn't change the factory track width.

Posted

 

Zone is made by BDS from what i have heard? I've never owned a lifted truck, just leveling kits on the last 4 of them. It's very difficult.

 

Yes Zone is owned by Sport Truck USA who also owns BDS and JKS. Basically Zone is BDS' little brother designed to compete with guys like Ready Lift and Rough Country.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Posted

Yes Zone is owned by Sport Truck USA who also owns BDS and JKS. Basically Zone is BDS' little brother designed to compete with guys like Ready Lift and Rough Country.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

 

What made you decide to choose the BDS kit over the Zone or any of the other choices you had to choose from?

Posted

 

What made you decide to choose the BDS kit over the Zone or any of the other choices you had to choose from?

I went with the BDS because of their superior build quality, reputation, warranties (no fine print and 60k mile) and coilovers. Zero regrets, it has been a fantastic kit. Also here are the pictures you wanted too. Again my wheel specs are 20x10 (-24 offset/4.5"bs) and 35x13.5R20 Toyo RT's.

 

de1d77f60700f5f9d3d79488f95e4db8.jpg

 

3f65cbc37e35383fabde63166d17a964.jpg

 

abd0beb411a5eed1f09ca0bd06922441.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

I went with the BDS because of their superior build quality, reputation, warranties (no fine print and 60k mile) and coilovers. Zero regrets, it has been a fantastic kit. Also here are the pictures you wanted too. Again my wheel specs are 20x10 (-24 offset/4.5"bs) and 35x13.5R20 Toyo RT's.de1d77f60700f5f9d3d79488f95e4db8.jpg3f65cbc37e35383fabde63166d17a964.jpgabd0beb411a5eed1f09ca0bd06922441.jpg

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

ok so these pics are a BDS 4" kit? Edited by Csjumper2003
Posted

I went with the BDS because of their superior build quality, reputation, warranties (no fine print and 60k mile) and coilovers. Zero regrets, it has been a fantastic kit. Also here are the pictures you wanted too. Again my wheel specs are 20x10 (-24 offset/4.5"bs) and 35x13.5R20 Toyo RT's.

 

de1d77f60700f5f9d3d79488f95e4db8.jpg

 

3f65cbc37e35383fabde63166d17a964.jpg

 

abd0beb411a5eed1f09ca0bd06922441.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

 

 

That is the exact look I am going for. So you picked the BDS kit with coil overs correct?

Posted

ok so these pics are a BDS 4" kit?

No 6" but the parking lot at my apartment complex slopes down. Thats why the front looks low.

 

 

That is the exact look I am going for. So you picked the BDS kit with coil overs correct?

I am the BDS kit with Fox coil overs, fox 2.0 shocks for the rear and the BDS glide ride leaf springs.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,931 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...