Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Easy to correct with a Hypertech speedometer calibrator.

 

No AFM is load based by putting a larger tire on you are raising the gear ration making it harder for the engine to move the truck, however slightly it is enough to pass the set point at which the AFM switches V4 mode on and saves you gas money.

 

You can tune it all you want but the engine will not have enough power in V4 to give the same fuel economy it was designed for.

Chevy maxed the technology out to get the mileage.

Just like putting 35's on a 4banger toyo your milage is gonna tank.

Posted (edited)

No AFM is load based by putting a larger tire on you are raising the gear ration making it harder for the engine to move the truck, however slightly it is enough to pass the set point at which the AFM switches V4 mode on and saves you gas money.

 

You can tune it all you want but the engine will not have enough power in V4 to give the same fuel economy it was designed for.

Chevy maxed the technology out to get the mileage.

Just like putting 35's on a 4banger toyo your milage is gonna tank.

What you say is partially true. My effective gear ratio is in between two of the ratios (3.08 and 3.42) GM offers on these trucks. By correcting the tire size the ECM uses, it changes the shift points and V4 engagement. I experimented with different sizes with the Hypertech and found (as compared to stock tires installed):

 

1. Oversize tires with no correction gave delayed shifts to higher gears and decreased V4 use.

 

2. Artificially high tire sizes (example: putting in 40" when the actual installed size is 34") actually gave more V4 usage but greatly exaggerated delays in shifting. RPM would run very high before shifting, but it stayed in V4 mode almost all the time. So the ECM anticipated more load from the effective change in gearing, but also realized that under light throttle and the higher rpm, 4 cylinders were more than enough to provide the power necessary.

 

3. Oversize tires with correct oversize programmed in yields shifts and V4 engagement virtually the same as stock. For example, at 45mph I am just under 1,100 rpm in 6th gear with V4 engaged. How does that compare to what you see with a 3.08 or 3.42 rear end?

 

So obviously I ended up with option 3 above, and my mileage is almost as good as stock. Naturally there will be a slight decrease from the extra mass of the larger tires, but 19 overall after 15K miles according to the OnStar app seems pretty reasonable for a 4wd crew with 6.5 foot bed truck that is rated 16/22 and 18 overall. My worst tank was recently 8mpg during a day of rock crawling at speeds less than 5mph. My best is 24. Usually I'm right around 18-19 in town and 19-20 on the highway cruising at 80. As others have reported, if I drop the speed to about 73 or less the mileage climbs closer to the epa 22 highway rating. I have a few DIC pictures of typical mileage. My 400 mile average is usually around 20, but does drop after off-roading or hi-speed highway runs. BTW, the truck is very quiet and smooth cruising at 95, but naturally a bit thirsty at that speed. That was on the extraterrestrial highway in northern Nevada, probably the longest, most boring stretch of road I have ever been on.

 

Last comment: with the correct tire size calibration, my odometer error is 0.2 miles per 100 miles, which is probably more accurate than any of the stock odometers. So what I am saying is the mileage figures are accurate and corrected for the oversize tires by the Hypertech.

 

Bottom line is that oversize tires and a lift, even a small one like mine, will naturally decrease your mileage, but it's a small hit if you take the time to program the ecm for your mods. So if you like more ground clearance and larger tires for off-roading, go for it. Might not be very driveable if you start with the 3.08, but if you have the 3.42 or 3.73 you should be fine.

 

BTW, I did test drive an all-terrain, 5.5 foot bed with 3.08 rear end and 34's like mine, no speedometer correction, and it actually drove okay. It was very much like you suggested in that I saw very little V4 engagement, plus I didn't want the reduced payload and towing capacity of the 3.08. Ideally I would have bought the 3.73, but 3.42 is all that was available back in August and I was impatient, so here I am. No regrets.

Edited by DanielAcosta
Posted (edited)

I'm in sales so I'm on the road all the time, fuel mileage is within 4mpg to my 2011 SHAWD TL requiring PREMIUM GAS

 

 

Truck gets 15-18 town 21/24 hwy (75/55 mph)REGULAR GAS!!!!!

 

The .40 difference per gallon makes up for the 4mpg less.

 

I use the truck to pull no more than about 3-7k lbs max

 

Usually this urevu9e2.jpg

 

On a 6x12 trailer is all I have @2300lbs pulls like nothing's there even with the 3.08.

 

If I need to pull something really heavy I borrow dads crewcab '73 F350 with a ported/polished/balanced and bored 90over 460 well over 600hp/600lbs plenty of grunt @4gpmile though

 

 

The 3.08 can not handle the oversized tires like the 3.42 can those BFGs snuck-in in middle of the night and violently bludgeoned my fuel mileage to death with the aggressive good looking tread of a 33.6" all terrain tire.

Edited by Ohanacreek
Posted

What speed? I'm trying to experiment between 45-60 myself.

Posted (edited)

55 if I hold 55 I will get about 21 out of the 6.0. It is a pretty fuel efficient number

Edited by Chris
Posted

I'm getting 19mpg at about 65mph and can get that even at 70mph, but I'm really working it with minimal accelerator touch.

 

20 to 21mph can easily be had at 55mph average. That's with 18'' wheels and Michelin tires, not the Goodyear Wranglers.

Posted

I'm getting 19mpg at about 65mph and can get that even at 70mph, but I'm really working it with minimal accelerator touch.

 

20 to 21mpg can easily be had at 55mph average. That's with 18'' wheels and Michelin tires, not the Goodyear Wranglers. I think as I put more miles on this truck, I'll get a bit more MPG as things begin to loosen up. 3000 miles currently.



I'm getting 19mpg at about 65mph and can get that even at 70mph, but I'm really working it with minimal accelerator touch.

 

20 to 21mpg can easily be had at 55mph average. That's with 18'' wheels and Michelin tires, not the Goodyear Wranglers. I think as I put more miles on this truck, I'll get a bit more MPG as things begin to loosen up. 3000 miles currently.

Posted (edited)

What speed? I'm trying to experiment between 45-60 myself.

I finally got my truck!

 

I only have a 100ish miles on it but it seems 25 to 30 around town does real good. I took the wife out to dinner last night and did 20 miles down the highway and got 21mpg at 60. I'm sure I'll have to do the same thing and figure out what speeds get the better mpg. So far I really like the truck!

Edited by New2GMC
  • Like 1
Posted

weird message editing. Not sure what happened. Sorry about the multiple messages.

Posted (edited)

my best 25 mile average was around 24mpgs. Mostly highway about 55 mph

Edited by fondupot
  • Like 1
Posted

i drove 50-55 for about an hour and the "best last 25 miles" it reached up to 23.1 or something around there. that was all flat roads no traffic. the difference between 60mph and 70mph mpg wise, there is none. I get about the same. ranging from 17-21 on the dic.

Posted

Here's mine W/O winter blend fuel. 14' CC, 4WD, 5.3, 3:08, 6'6" box

I can't see it. I do see you aren't moving on the speedometer. you do a lot of idling?
Posted

Re: my mileage, idling will actually decrease gas mileage on the DIC. My best & average mpg is optained by normal highway, stop/go and freeway driving. I do fill with 91+ octane non ethanol fuel. From the get go ~1000 miles, my best mileage was in the 26+ range. As my handle says, I love my truck!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,689 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
    • I went to the county a few years back to dispute my property taxes. To do that I hired an appraiser and a lawyer. The County Assessor wished to argue that the homes in my neighborhood the appraiser used were all 'distressed properties" and not representative of the "Market Average".    My response was," Of the 50 homes in our subdivision 43 of them were "distressed properties" under bank foreclosure and as such "Distressed IS the market". Lawyer about choked on his coffee and handed the Assessor the 'receipts'.    I won that case on the evidence provided by the Lawyer and the Appraiser.    We have the same thing going on here. My statements were based on the GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL DATA and yours on local markets in areas of your interest. They are both correct....   Thing is, this divergence was based on NATIONAL and not on LOCAL. I think you even understand that. But like you said, we are both stubborn and hardheaded.    I do not see any advantage to disengagement.  But that said we can step back to compose ourselves. 
    • Trust me I appreciate the comments and concerns. It's what I was looking for to help me evaluate the situation and what I want to do. I have decided to move forward with the BORA hubcentric slip on 3/8" (.375") with the extended lugs nuts. Fedex says they should be here Monday :). Meanwhile, the dealer got the remote start and Patriot spray in bed liner done over the last couple of days. Also, I installed an inline stop/start eliminator today. Starts back up in what whatever mode you shut it off in, so you don't have to hit the button every time you fire up.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...