Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The 14008 recall incorporated the 13330 recall into it. It's just software updates. It's kind of like when windows does one big service pack instead of installing a bunch of little software patches they do one big one...

 

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

If you owned your truck before January you would have know that they are two different recalls. And GM has had problems with fuel pump setting.

Posted

If you owned your truck before January you would have know that they are two different recalls. And GM has had problems with fuel pump setting.

 

this right here... my dealership has had my truck the last few days and I told them I will NOT pick it up until im getting at least the MPG prior to the last recall (14-16 mpg which still sucked). They keep telling me they can't figure it out/that being said it is ready for pick up and I refuse to pick up a truck that's getting 9-12 mpg right now. If i wanted a $50k+ truck with that mileage I would have a bought a freaking Raptor.

  • Like 1
Posted

I'm thinking of doing the same thing when it's in this week. I average 13.5 not letting the tach over 2k. If I drove it like I'd like, not bagging it, I'd get the same as my 2005 3/4 ton.

 

Sent from my SGH-I747M using Tapatalk

 

 

Posted

Mine's brand new (<1000 KMs) and still breaking in. Past weekend, I averaged 11.5 L/100 KM over 450 KMs. That translates to about 20 US MPG or 25 MPG Canadian. Driving was on country 2 lane roads lots of hills, straight-a-ways etc.

Posted

Just picked up my truck, they did the rear window recall and held onto it for a few days when i told them the fire recall screwed up my mileage a few weeks back. They couldnt find anything wrong and said the truck is running normal. As a precaution they told me they completely reflashed the whole truck, re-did every flash (3 in total) since the truck was built (throttle body, transmission, and then fire recall flashes) and said they all went in perfectly (fire recall flash was weird they said because their internet went down in the middle of the flash?). But overall he said the truck is running "happy" now (whatever the hell that means). The technician said it will run weird for a bit though because it needs to relearn my driving habits and boy was he not kidding. The 30 mile highway trip home was funky, shifts were wacky and engine was all over the place for the first half and then evened out, I will note it was in V4 A LOT and the drone was really noticeable compared to before even with my stock exhaust. Hopefully when everything gets back to learning my grandpa habits it will be near the 16-18 mpg i was originally receiving. I will update you guys after a few tanks of gas.

  • Like 1
Posted

2014 GMC AT 5.3 3.42 4X4

I had a problem with vibration and recently changed tires from BFG 285/55/R20 to Michelin LTX 275/55/R20. I also removed air dam, then reinstalled. Before I was only getting avg of 13 MPG. I also just had the recall done. Now I am at

 

post-35332-0-63788200-1391467153_thumb.jpg

post-35332-0-63788200-1391467153_thumb.jpg

post-35332-0-63788200-1391467153_thumb.jpg

post-35332-0-63788200-1391467153_thumb.jpg

Posted

2014 GMC AT 5.3 3.42 4X4

I had a problem with vibration and recently changed tires from BFG 285/55/R20 to Michelin LTX 275/55/R20. I also removed air dam, then reinstalled. Before I was only getting avg of 13 MPG. I also just had the recall done. Now I am at

 

Do you have after market rims on the your truck if do then check the spacing between the hub and rim. You might want to to try hub centric rings.
Posted

Do you have after market rims on the your truck if do then check the spacing between the hub and rim. You might want to to try hub centric rings.

 

They are factory rims. Once the Michelins were put on it drives very smooth with no vibration.

Posted (edited)

2014 GMC AT 5.3 3.42 4X4

I had a problem with vibration and recently changed tires from BFG 285/55/R20 to Michelin LTX 275/55/R20. I also removed air dam, then reinstalled. Before I was only getting avg of 13 MPG. I also just had the recall done. Now I am at

 

I thought about the factory tires on my 2014 GMC Sierra Crew Cab SLT Z71 4x4 mght not contribute much to the mileage factor LOL they are the 20" all terrain goodyears. I was running a set of Michelins on my 09 that got a consistent 18.1 mpg over a bunch of miles so I agree the tires could make a difference. Will hopefully be a couple of years before I have to install a new set so going to have to suffer through this I guess. What REALLY hurts my feelings is that I just got back from a business trip to PA The rental car that I drove up there for around 300 miles (dogging it) averaged 39.1 MPG. This truck looks like it is gonna be pushed to get 1/2 that consistently. HOWEVER the comfort level in that little midsize Mazda was not very good. Hmm we do value comfort a lot I guess.

Edited by Dnt
Posted

6.2L 3.42 4X4

Austin to San Antonio and then to Corpus Christi with a 20mph head wind(only close to Corpus Christi) doing no greater than 70mph the entire way. --- 17.8 (by hand) --- 18.3 reported by the dash.

About 20 miles driven around Corpus Christi and then back to San Antonio going into a strong northern while doing 75mph --- 14.9 (by hand) --- 15.6 reported by the dash.

 

Maybe its the strong wind, but my dash read out does not seem to be very accurate.

Posted

I won't officially complain until after break in...it has bee consistently cold here..Low 20's and teens. I'm at 384 miles...roads are bad...it's been in Auto 4x4 most of the time...took a highway trip...70 mph...15.5mpg.

 

In town I'm getting roughly 11 to 12 mpgs.

 

I'm pissed. My 2012 got way better mileage than this...but I'll hold off ripping into GM until after break-in a few more tanks of gas. I've never gotten this kind of mileage...even in the winter...even with a new truck...my 2012 was purchased in a February.

Posted

2 full fill ups and 1 12 gallon fill up. First fill up 17.1, second fill up was 17.6. Both of those were lots of rural driving and plenty of hunting (4x4 use). 12 gallon fill up was 75% highway and the rest like above 2 tanks. That fill up I got 19.3. So far I am plenty happy with my 4.3 double cab 4x4.

Posted

The ecotec 4.3 is a perfect match for this truck.

 

My average is 20.9 over the last 3800 miles, mixed city/highway and towing trailers around 3k lbs. This v6 feels like it has the same power as my old 2004 5.3l. My best 400 miles run is 23.0 according to the computer. Im really happy with this engine.

 

As someone who tows 8k-12k pound equipment trailers on a regular basis with my '05 3500 duramax dually I really dont understand why anyone would put a 6.2l in a half ton pickup and then try to tow 10k lbs. Yes, you might have the power to get up a steep hill but trying to control it in any type of emergency situation is very dangerous.

 

Is there anyone here that had actually tried to tow 12k lbs? That's just plain stupid to put 12k lbs behind a half ton truck. If you need to tow that much just get a 2500 or 3500.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Folks, Have a great new 2026 WT  (std cab, 2.7/4WD) w/base 40/20/40 mech adj bench "fake buckets"  (with lower and upper center console) heavy vinyl seats.  Overall the seats are very comfortable and the vinyl is heavy and appears less likely to 'split out'. Am very tall (6'5")  + a bad back/osteporosis/former hyperparathyroidism so ease/range of movement is a bit restricted.  The truck rides a bit high and I use a nerf step bar w/my left foot to step in, then I put right foot/leg in, drag my butt in  & get seated.  Worked fine in my 2018 RAM quadCab. But I end up dragging my butt over the left raised sidecushsion area of vinyl seat, and due to texture there's fair amount of traction on slide inward.  (ArmorAll didn't improve.) If the seat were even ~1/2" - 3/4" lower it'd be helpful, but base seats just have the forward/backward underseat bail and the side lever for tilt which really doesn't affect seat height.   I really don't want to 'de-puff' the left side sidecushion forming the  fake 'bucket'. I know one company sells 'seat elevator blocks':  but is there a simple way of lowering the height of the driver seat instead?   Thanks Bill W San Jose  
    • I have a basic 2026 1500 WT  (2.7L/4WD reg cab shorttbed). Comfy, generally happy with electronics/radio - but is there a way I can add switches to steering wheel right-side position (curr. empty) so I can adjust volume, push phone button to voice dial, etc? Bill W San Jose  
    • The curb weight on a 1 ton crew cab long bed is around 7k lbs.  Now, I don't know where you went to school but 9k is not more than 2x 7k lbs. More than 2x 7k lbs would be 14k+.   With that said, obviously yes you're going to feel a 9k lb trailer when slowing down.  I already said, when accelerating.  When changing lanes?  No.  But if you look at the context of what was quoted, the original person said, "after a mile or two..." which means that would be after the accelerating portion and you're driving a generally steady pace.  Please do learn to read and comprehend.
    • So I purchased the Range unit for my 2026 and I am seeing different locations suggested for the ECM . Can anyone confirm wither under hood, left side or right side or behind the wheelwell?
    • Like I've said before. Di and Carbon buildup is not that big of a concern. Engine had minimal buildup, and that engine was obviously not super well maintained. Do regular oil changes, and you're gtg as long as the rest of the truck lasts. Also, the High Pressure FP that people ****** about, but can't tell you why.  Now, I wish they'd trash the variable oil pump. No real world issues with them, but I'll gladly eat whatever miniscule MPG it's saving me in favor of more oil at all RPMs.    Curious to see his assessment of the 7.3 compared to the 6.6. I expect he'll praise the port inj, but from a structural standpoint, the 6.6 is as robust as any engine out there.    Not to take away from the 7.3. I feel it's equally as good as the 6.6.     As to heat on the rear cyls, I'd have to see numerous examples before I'd say it's an issue. Especially not knowing the history of that engine. For all is known, they could have blown a rad hose, and ran it hot, and the 2 rear cyls may be the first to get hot in a low coolant situation, but not be an issue aside from that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...