Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Finally got mine clean. Readylift 2.25", Method NV 17x8.5 0 offset, Duratrac 285/70/17.

 

505925c9c8691fb74d85c2252b38c661.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Your truck is gorgeous [emoji7]

 

Life is full of regrets.. Buying bfgs isn't one of them!

Posted

Hello All,

 

First off, I want to say thank you to everyone on this forum, for all your research, information and pictures. It made my effort on the modification on my truck much easier. I have taken many pictures and tried to get as much details about before/after in ride height and fuel mileage for everyone. I hope this helps everyone who is looking at doing the same. My truck had an almost 4” rake before the level, which drove me nuts and the low ground clearance in front, were the main reasons I added the level and larger tires. Absolutely love the way the truck came out, would do it again in a heartbeat.

 

2014 GMC Sierra Crew Cab SLT All Terrain 5.3L Short Bed

Level Kit - Pro Comp 2.25” level

Tires - 275/60/20 BFG A/T KO2s

 

RIDE HEIGHT

Before (measured from the ground through the center of the tire to the wheel well):

Front - 36”

Rear - 39 ¾”

 

After (same measurement technique):

Front - 38 ¾”

Rear - 39 ¾”

 

Pro Comp 2.25” Level Front end only (nothing done to the rear). I went with this kit instead of the RC 2.5” because it seems to be of a slightly higher quality material and I didn’t know if that additional .25” would make it look too tall with 275/60s.

 

I measured multiple times before to ensure accuracy, as well as multiple times after. Yes, I thought was a little odd that the rear didn’t come up since the new tires were just over a full inch taller, but seems this isn’t the only case. Front came up exactly 2.25” + 0.5”. I adjusted the headlights slightly after because they ran a little high, easy adjustment.

 

RIDE QUALITY

Before the level kit and tires, this truck rides great, especially for this large of a truck. It was incredible quiet and surprisingly soft. After the level kit and tires, there is a very noticeable stiffness in the front end now. By no means is it too stiff, but coming from how soft the stock truck is, its a much firmer ride. (I have gotten use to it since the initial drive from the shop). I am sure this is a combo of the level kit and tires. Being a firmer ride, I would argue that the truck actually handles turns better now with the firmer setup.

Sound - The level kit I wouldn’t imagine would have any difference in road noise, maybe wind noise as it sits higher, but with the new KO2s, you can hear a little bit of a buzz on the highway over stock (stock tires are incredibly quiet). Most people would not even notice, especially if the music is on.

Acceleration - These new tires (BFG A/T KO2s 275/60/20) are much heavier than the stock Goodyear Wrangler SR-A (275/55/20), and you notice it immediately. Again, nothing you won’t get use to with time, but right after they were put on, accelerating off the line it is noticeable that these tires are in the range of +16lbs per tire. This plays into MPG below.

 

MPG

Before I was in the range of 17 CIty and 22 Hwy. After the level and tires, I am in the 15 City and 21 Hwy. When I am going just around town in traffic, it can easily be in the 14 mpg range. On the highway, I haven’t noticed that big of a difference each drive is a little different and it’s in the 0-2mpg range. (Don’t have many really flat hwys where I am)

 

TIRES

Had the stock Goodyear Wrangler SR-A (275/55/20) previously and they are great highway tire, but terrible off road and in bad weather. I wanted to go with a good all terrain tire that I can take off road, use in the snow and still be on an everyday truck. I was originally going to go with the 275/65/20 KO2s but were out of stock and it would take 3 months to arrive, and I was getting a super deal, so I went with what they had in stock, 275/60/20. The shop I went to said there is a small chance the 65s would rub a little with the Pro Comp 2.25” level, so I decided to play it safe, and cheaper with the 60s. (Plus the 65s would be even heavier and higher load rating) They fit VERY easily, not even close to rubbing anywhere. I will probably go with the 65 series when these wear out for a little extra height and the look. So far I have had them on city, hwy, snow and light off road, and they have been great.

 

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

  • Like 2
Posted

Hello All,

 

First off, I want to say thank you to everyone on this forum, for all your research, information and pictures. It made my effort on the modification on my truck much easier. I have taken many pictures and tried to get as much details about before/after in ride height and fuel mileage for everyone. I hope this helps everyone who is looking at doing the same. My truck had an almost 4” rake before the level, which drove me nuts and the low ground clearance in front, were the main reasons I added the level and larger tires. Absolutely love the way the truck came out, would do it again in a heartbeat.

 

2014 GMC Sierra Crew Cab SLT All Terrain 5.3L Short Bed

Level Kit - Pro Comp 2.25” level

Tires - 275/60/20 BFG A/T KO2s

 

RIDE HEIGHT

Before (measured from the ground through the center of the tire to the wheel well):

Front - 36”

Rear - 39 ¾”

 

After (same measurement technique):

Front - 38 ¾”

Rear - 39 ¾”

 

Pro Comp 2.25” Level Front end only (nothing done to the rear). I went with this kit instead of the RC 2.5” because it seems to be of a slightly higher quality material and I didn’t know if that additional .25” would make it look too tall with 275/60s.

 

I measured multiple times before to ensure accuracy, as well as multiple times after. Yes, I thought was a little odd that the rear didn’t come up since the new tires were just over a full inch taller, but seems this isn’t the only case. Front came up exactly 2.25” + 0.5”. I adjusted the headlights slightly after because they ran a little high, easy adjustment.

 

RIDE QUALITY

Before the level kit and tires, this truck rides great, especially for this large of a truck. It was incredible quiet and surprisingly soft. After the level kit and tires, there is a very noticeable stiffness in the front end now. By no means is it too stiff, but coming from how soft the stock truck is, its a much firmer ride. (I have gotten use to it since the initial drive from the shop). I am sure this is a combo of the level kit and tires. Being a firmer ride, I would argue that the truck actually handles turns better now with the firmer setup.

Sound - The level kit I wouldn’t imagine would have any difference in road noise, maybe wind noise as it sits higher, but with the new KO2s, you can hear a little bit of a buzz on the highway over stock (stock tires are incredibly quiet). Most people would not even notice, especially if the music is on.

Acceleration - These new tires (BFG A/T KO2s 275/60/20) are much heavier than the stock Goodyear Wrangler SR-A (275/55/20), and you notice it immediately. Again, nothing you won’t get use to with time, but right after they were put on, accelerating off the line it is noticeable that these tires are in the range of +16lbs per tire. This plays into MPG below.

 

MPG

Before I was in the range of 17 CIty and 22 Hwy. After the level and tires, I am in the 15 City and 21 Hwy. When I am going just around town in traffic, it can easily be in the 14 mpg range. On the highway, I haven’t noticed that big of a difference each drive is a little different and it’s in the 0-2mpg range. (Don’t have many really flat hwys where I am)

 

TIRES

Had the stock Goodyear Wrangler SR-A (275/55/20) previously and they are great highway tire, but terrible off road and in bad weather. I wanted to go with a good all terrain tire that I can take off road, use in the snow and still be on an everyday truck. I was originally going to go with the 275/65/20 KO2s but were out of stock and it would take 3 months to arrive, and I was getting a super deal, so I went with what they had in stock, 275/60/20. The shop I went to said there is a small chance the 65s would rub a little with the Pro Comp 2.25” level, so I decided to play it safe, and cheaper with the 60s. (Plus the 65s would be even heavier and higher load rating) They fit VERY easily, not even close to rubbing anywhere. I will probably go with the 65 series when these wear out for a little extra height and the look. So far I have had them on city, hwy, snow and light off road, and they have been great.

 

 

Awesome review. I have the same truck and just added Bilstein 5100's to level my truck. I am waiting on the same tires as well. those pictures of your truck make me really excited for when my tires show up.

Posted

I like BBSierra84's truck height and stance. This is the ride height I'm looking for. In my opinion, this is the perfect stance and height for these trucks.

gallery_151887_3808_278301.jpg

Posted

RC 2inch level, with 275-70-18 Grabber AT2's

 

Those Generals look much beefier than KO2s in that same size. Looks like you have some ballooning around the rim to make them look wider. How do you like the front and rear look of them?

Posted

Hello All,

 

First off, I want to say thank you to everyone on this forum, for all your research, information and pictures. It made my effort on the modification on my truck much easier. I have taken many pictures and tried to get as much details about before/after in ride height and fuel mileage for everyone. I hope this helps everyone who is looking at doing the same. My truck had an almost 4” rake before the level, which drove me nuts and the low ground clearance in front, were the main reasons I added the level and larger tires. Absolutely love the way the truck came out, would do it again in a heartbeat.

 

2014 GMC Sierra Crew Cab SLT All Terrain 5.3L Short Bed

Level Kit - Pro Comp 2.25” level

Tires - 275/60/20 BFG A/T KO2s

 

RIDE HEIGHT

Before (measured from the ground through the center of the tire to the wheel well):

Front - 36”

Rear - 39 ¾”

 

After (same measurement technique):

Front - 38 ¾”

Rear - 39 ¾”

 

Pro Comp 2.25” Level Front end only (nothing done to the rear). I went with this kit instead of the RC 2.5” because it seems to be of a slightly higher quality material and I didn’t know if that additional .25” would make it look too tall with 275/60s.

 

I measured multiple times before to ensure accuracy, as well as multiple times after. Yes, I thought was a little odd that the rear didn’t come up since the new tires were just over a full inch taller, but seems this isn’t the only case. Front came up exactly 2.25” + 0.5”. I adjusted the headlights slightly after because they ran a little high, easy adjustment.

 

RIDE QUALITY

Before the level kit and tires, this truck rides great, especially for this large of a truck. It was incredible quiet and surprisingly soft. After the level kit and tires, there is a very noticeable stiffness in the front end now. By no means is it too stiff, but coming from how soft the stock truck is, its a much firmer ride. (I have gotten use to it since the initial drive from the shop). I am sure this is a combo of the level kit and tires. Being a firmer ride, I would argue that the truck actually handles turns better now with the firmer setup.

Sound - The level kit I wouldn’t imagine would have any difference in road noise, maybe wind noise as it sits higher, but with the new KO2s, you can hear a little bit of a buzz on the highway over stock (stock tires are incredibly quiet). Most people would not even notice, especially if the music is on.

Acceleration - These new tires (BFG A/T KO2s 275/60/20) are much heavier than the stock Goodyear Wrangler SR-A (275/55/20), and you notice it immediately. Again, nothing you won’t get use to with time, but right after they were put on, accelerating off the line it is noticeable that these tires are in the range of +16lbs per tire. This plays into MPG below.

 

MPG

Before I was in the range of 17 CIty and 22 Hwy. After the level and tires, I am in the 15 City and 21 Hwy. When I am going just around town in traffic, it can easily be in the 14 mpg range. On the highway, I haven’t noticed that big of a difference each drive is a little different and it’s in the 0-2mpg range. (Don’t have many really flat hwys where I am)

 

TIRES

Had the stock Goodyear Wrangler SR-A (275/55/20) previously and they are great highway tire, but terrible off road and in bad weather. I wanted to go with a good all terrain tire that I can take off road, use in the snow and still be on an everyday truck. I was originally going to go with the 275/65/20 KO2s but were out of stock and it would take 3 months to arrive, and I was getting a super deal, so I went with what they had in stock, 275/60/20. The shop I went to said there is a small chance the 65s would rub a little with the Pro Comp 2.25” level, so I decided to play it safe, and cheaper with the 60s. (Plus the 65s would be even heavier and higher load rating) They fit VERY easily, not even close to rubbing anywhere. I will probably go with the 65 series when these wear out for a little extra height and the look. So far I have had them on city, hwy, snow and light off road, and they have been great.

 

What rims do you have?

Posted

Alright guys.

 

Got my level/lift installed and have the alignment scheduled for tomorrow. I installed a readylift front 2.25 level along with the replacement 2 inch rear block. All said and done I received 2 1/8 inch lift on the front and a full inch in the rear. So my overall take went from 2 3/4 back to front down to 1 5/8. I occasionally pull an equipment trailer with a utility tractor or similar equipment on it so I don't want to go much under the 1.5 number on my rake.

I do like the look. But all my numbers from above are averaged from the difference from the left vs. right side of my truck. What I don't understand is how my right rear can sit so much higher then the left rear. When putting the tape measure from the wheel well straight down through the center of the hub my rear is nearly 3/4 of an inch different. Right being higher. Before the lift was put in it was only roughly 1/2 inch difference. I am taking my truck to the dealership later this week for some frame coating that has peeled off. So I am going to pick their ears about this dilemma.

 

Here is a picture of the before after and left/right after. Let me know if you think the left/right is out of what my tolerance should be.

 

f8dc5d7003c8037ee5a19a07ad5ddb43.jpg

dc0fc83ebec9e343f10770a5cd8b8301.jpg9f1f4fb77cd307deeba960c8b77646d7.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Whats the biggest tire anyone has fit on an 18" wheel with the 2" RC level?

Not sure about the biggest but I have a 275/70/18 on mine.

One guy on here has 295/70/18 on his 18" Method wheels.

 

I think he had to trim a bit though.

Edited by tyrich88
Posted

2015 Silverado LT 2wd with 2.5" rough country level kit installed. Tires are Cooper Discover SST PRO 295/55/r20 Mud Terrains. Wheels are the Raceline Rampage 20x9 with 0 offset. Trimmed a few inches of the rear fender felt. No rubbing so far. Debating the purchase of a Rough Country 1.25" body lift.

 

med_gallery_152447_3815_1561492.jpg

 

med_gallery_152447_3815_664367.jpg

 

med_gallery_152447_3815_3328469.jpg

 

med_gallery_152447_3815_762033.jpg

 

med_gallery_152447_3815_205182.jpg

 

med_gallery_152447_3815_1891314.jpg

  • Like 4
Posted

Not sure about the biggest but I have a 275/70/18 on mine.

One guy on here has 295/70/18 on his 18" Method wheels.

 

I think he had to trim a bit though.

Did you have any rub issues with that size and what tire did you go with as well because some seem to fit better than others in that same size. I'm getting new tires soon and just trying to make sure I won't have any rubbing issues.

Posted

Did you have any rub issues with that size and what tire did you go with as well because some seem to fit better than others in that same size. I'm getting new tires soon and just trying to make sure I won't have any rubbing issues.

I have not had any issues whatsoever with my tires.

I got the BFG AT KO2 in 275/70/18 and I absolutely love them. They're great in the snow and mud and everything in between, including the highway.

 

Here's mine

 

FCBC4F90-3306-4009-B659-F53C69A213AB_1.j

 

image2.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Alright guys.

 

Got my level/lift installed and have the alignment scheduled for tomorrow. I installed a readylift front 2.25 level along with the replacement 2 inch rear block. All said and done I received 2 1/8 inch lift on the front and a full inch in the rear. So my overall take went from 2 3/4 back to front down to 1 5/8. I occasionally pull an equipment trailer with a utility tractor or similar equipment on it so I don't want to go much under the 1.5 number on my rake.

I do like the look. But all my numbers from above are averaged from the difference from the left vs. right side of my truck. What I don't understand is how my right rear can sit so much higher then the left rear. When putting the tape measure from the wheel well straight down through the center of the hub my rear is nearly 3/4 of an inch different. Right being higher. Before the lift was put in it was only roughly 1/2 inch difference. I am taking my truck to the dealership later this week for some frame coating that has peeled off. So I am going to pick their ears about this dilemma.

 

Here is a picture of the before after and left/right after. Let me know if you think the left/right is out of what my tolerance should be.

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I don't know why either but the right side of my truck is higher too. Before my level, the right side was 1/2" higher. After the level and alignment, it's slight more than 1/4" higher than the left side. Can't notice it at all but it's just kinda funny.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,902
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Newest Member
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 267 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • are there any codes? with lots of rust, perhaps disconnect/clean both sides of the connection/examine cable ends (the wires) for corrosion going into the sheath & replace if necessary/reconnect ALL the power AND ground cables between the battery, engine, frame, cab, fuse box and starter charm.li (website) has a no-start diagnostic procedure you can work through to get it working.
    • Its no wonder you've gravitated to the oil types and brands you have in later years after trying certain brands and one being a specialty oil or at least very hard to come by up here and the other would have been a commonly found oil of the era and the vastly different outcomes as a result to using the vehicles in question the same distance for an OCI . It shows what marketing hype can do without actually having the product to back up the claims and that is no different now with the insane claims that are written on the side of a bottle of oil from some of the off the shelf oils.    What has surprised me and I was already finding this out before I bought my truck with the GDI engine, that this newer fancy technology that seemingly would suggest better fuel economy/emissions with this high pressure spray of fuel is not in reality kind at all to the engine or at least the oils life. Yet they insist on claiming long OCI with this technology just like they did with the port or similar type fuel injection systems when in reality its a step back in oil life to have a GDI system.    I think the mistake your making Grumpy is that your not sending your samples to Blackstone and getting the feel good glowing report that you can run it another 1000 or more miles and then send another sample where they say run it yet another 1000 miles and on and on it goes until your sending in something that looks a lot like road tar and then they may suggest you change your oil within the next 1000 miles 😆
    • I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 
    • In the 80's 90's I'd run Honda's 7,500 miles between changes using Red Line HP 5W20 and do it for hundreds of thousands of miles with issues. Back in the day it was an SAE 20 with the HTHS of a SAE 30 and SN add load. It was also very polar. Oxidation VOA was over 120. Besides those motors were SPFI and lean burn tech. I could have likely run it longer but never did.    We had a Toyota bought new I ran on Pennzoil's latest and greatest synthetic of the day with "Penthane". A made up word for a very low dose of PAO. Tried 7,500 mile OCI's in that Group III/VI chemistry and the rings tapped out at 90K. Rocker box wasn't as bad as the one Punch put up but it wasn't good either. Also a SPFI motor.    I'm around 3,750 across the board on these GDI monsters and the oil it tapped out by then usually on TBN/TAN crossover and color. Red Line HP Euro.    The AMSOIL SS brochures tell you to follow the OEM values for the service class but that it can be run up to 25K if monitored. I can't imagine what motor could go that distance and not tap out. I've never owned one.    Yes, I know. Lot's of people do. I'm just not going to be one of them. 
    • I knew a guy in the early 80's that bought a new Monte Carlo and ran it a 100,000 miles without ever changing the filter or the oil. Just kept adding. It looked like that inside.     
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...