Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Bare with me...I'm new here. I wanted to post a few pics since this forum has helped me figure out what I wanted to go with. Hopefully, this will help someone else out. I was looking to level my front end without giving up any ride quality, as well as get a little bit bigger tire without losing any gas mileage. I wanted to/and will eventually go with a 295/55, but going from about 42 lbs per tire to about 61 lbs per tire seemed like a big jump. I was going to get a programmer, but I read that with these newer trucks, the dealership can tell if you had programmed it, even if you programmed back to stock, and it could void the warranty. So, I decided I'll wait until my warranty is up before I go with a heavier tire and a programmer. I went with the Bilstein 5100 Adjustable Ride Height Shocks at highest setting (about 1.86) and 275/60 Nitto Terra Grappler G2 on stock 20x9 GMC Wheels. The tires are not an LT, but are an XL, which means they are a 4-ply tire with an extra load rating. They ride about the same as the tires that came on the truck and are the same weight. I do a lot of highway driving with very little off road driving or towing, so I was ok with not going to an LT tire. As far as the 5100's go, couldn't be happier. I read that the ride would be stiffer, but better. Didn't understand what that would feel like until I drove it. Much better...no more bounce. Even my wife thinks it rides better. No rub at all.

275/60, is that bigger then what you had? If so, you recalibrate the speedo? Will that affect "actual" mileage if you dont calibrate?

Posted

275/60, is that bigger then what you had? If so, you recalibrate the speedo? Will that affect "actual" mileage if you dont calibrate?

 

Yes, I had 275/55. Same width, just an inch taller now. I did not re calibrate, but I need to as I think I am off about 2-3 MPG. So if my speedo says 80, I'm really going 82 or 83. I haven't tested it yet, though to know exact. I am going to run by my GMC dealership and see if they can re calibrate the speedo for me, as I have read that they will for a small fee. I would like to go about an inch wider, which would put me into a 295/55, but I'm not ready to go up that much in weight.

Posted

Bare with me...I'm new here. I wanted to post a few pics since this forum has helped me figure out what I wanted to go with. Hopefully, this will help someone else out. I was looking to level my front end without giving up any ride quality, as well as get a little bit bigger tire without losing any gas mileage. I wanted to/and will eventually go with a 295/55, but going from about 42 lbs per tire to about 61 lbs per tire seemed like a big jump. I was going to get a programmer, but I read that with these newer trucks, the dealership can tell if you had programmed it, even if you programmed back to stock, and it could void the warranty. So, I decided I'll wait until my warranty is up before I go with a heavier tire and a programmer. I went with the Bilstein 5100 Adjustable Ride Height Shocks at highest setting (about 1.86) and 275/60 Nitto Terra Grappler G2 on stock 20x9 GMC Wheels. The tires are not an LT, but are an XL, which means they are a 4-ply tire with an extra load rating. They ride about the same as the tires that came on the truck and are the same weight. I do a lot of highway driving with very little off road driving or towing, so I was ok with not going to an LT tire. As far as the 5100's go, couldn't be happier. I read that the ride would be stiffer, but better. Didn't understand what that would feel like until I drove it. Much better...no more bounce. Even my wife thinks it rides better. No rub at all.

I recently joined as well. I have been reading for the past 2 weeks just on this one forum. I have been waiting for someone to post pictures of a Pepperdust Sierra with a level. Yours looks really good. Did you happen to take measurements before and after your install? I have been thinking about a 2" RC with Bilstein 5100's but I am gonna try and fit a larger tire.

Posted

I recently joined as well. I have been reading for the past 2 weeks just on this one forum. I have been waiting for someone to post pictures of a Pepperdust Sierra with a level. Yours looks really good. Did you happen to take measurements before and after your install? I have been thinking about a 2" RC with Bilstein 5100's but I am gonna try and fit a larger tire.

 

Thanks. Yeah there's not too many of this color yet. I search around as well. I didn't get exact measurements but my front wheel well was right at 36" off the ground, and now I'm right at 38". I wish I would've take exact measurements, because everything I've read about the 5100's is that at the highest you'll get 1.86", but it sure seems like I got a full 2". I know there's not a lot of difference, but needless to say I got every bit of 1.86". There are other forums that have a lot of discussion about using a 2" RC with 5100's. I found that the best thing to do was type into Google or Yahoo Images what I wanted to see. Most of the time, the photos are linked to a good forum.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

Yes, I had 275/55. Same width, just an inch taller now. I did not re calibrate, but I need to as I think I am off about 2-3 MPG. So if my speedo says 80, I'm really going 82 or 83. I haven't tested it yet, though to know exact. I am going to run by my GMC dealership and see if they can re calibrate the speedo for me, as I have read that they will for a small fee. I would like to go about an inch wider, which would put me into a 295/55, but I'm not ready to go up that much in weight.

 

Don't bother with asking the dealer to recalibrate for the taller tires. Been there and was told "no". All the factory tire sizes are close to 31.75" in height, regardless of the rim size. My dealer was straight up about it with me, he said they couldn't do it, and if I used an aftermarket programmer, to even simply adjust for the tire size, GM considers it a "modification" to the factory programming and can/will null your powertrain warranty if you have any issues later. He said it was best to be aware that the speedo was off by a little and just live with it.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

Don't bother with asking the dealer to recalibrate for the taller tires. Been there and was told "no". All the factory tire sizes are close to 31.75" in height, regardless of the rim size. My dealer was straight up about it with me, he said they couldn't do it, and if I used an aftermarket programmer, to even simply adjust for the tire size, GM considers it a "modification" to the factory programming and can/will null your powertrain warranty if you have any issues later. He said it was best to be aware that the speedo was off by a little and just live with it.

 

Ok, cool. Thanks for the heads up. Guess I'll just live with it, then and won't waste my time.

Posted

Progression of my 2016 Z71. Hopefully this helps some members decide on how far to go.

 

Stock

20161112_082051.jpg

 

2" RC Level with stock wheels/tires

20161113_075121.jpg

 

2" RC Level with Gear Alloy 20x9 and Toyo ATII 295/55/20 (Very smoky that day due to wildfires in our area).

20161118_110341.jpg

 

Cleaned up

20161120_161234.jpg

 

2" RC level with Zone 1.5" Body Lift. RC steps added for the wife. Having exhaust pipe raised next week.

Lift%20with%20steps.jpg

Looking for my 2016 Sierra. Which Zone 1.5" BL did you buy? The website only lists a 2014-2015 Chevy/GMC 1500 1.5" kit.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I purchased the BL for 2015-2015 models. The instructions actually include steps for 2016 models. I'm not sure why they haven't revised the kit description.

Edited by Salty315
Posted

Looking for my 2016 Sierra. Which Zone 1.5" BL did you buy? The website only lists a 2014-2015 Chevy/GMC 1500 1.5" kit.

I purchased the BL for 2015-2015 models. The instructions actually include steps for 2016 models. I'm not sure why they haven't revised the kit description.

Posted

Here's mine with 20x9 Mavericks and 295/55 Toyos, RC 2" in the front only

:drool: are you leveled evenly w just the 2" in front?

Posted

I purchased the BL for 2015-2015 models. The instructions actually include steps for 2016 models. I'm not sure why they haven't revised the kit description.

Thanks! I'll call and ask them why it hasn't been updated.

Posted

Thanks! I'll call and ask them why it hasn't been updated.

FYI. I just got off the phone with Jeremy at Zone and he told me that they will be coming out with a kit for the 2016 models but it is different from the 2014-2015 C9151 Zone 1.5" BL Kit. He said the bolts should be different and the parking brake bracket will be different and the new kit should be available "soon". That was the best he could offer me.

Posted

I purchased the BL for 2015-2015 models. The instructions actually include steps for 2016 models. I'm not sure why they haven't revised the kit description.

He told me on the phone that the instructions were updated "prematurely"...

Posted

Here's mine with 20x9 Mavericks and 295/55 Toyos, RC 2" in the front only

Nice truck! Love those front ends, especially color matched.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Very true.   However.  GM did give those trucks with the single speed case Terrain Mode.  Terrain Mode mimics 4LO minus the gear reduction and torque capability.  It uses the ABS/braking system to perform the operation.  It also gives these one pedal driving (sort of) when in Terrain Mode via the active brake during throttle lift.     Does it have its limitations over a true 2 speed case?  Sure.  But it works.         
    • Of course actually engaging four wheel drive is step one or even daring to use a ramp like that with a two wheel drive and getting into a mess because of it. As to 4 low, these last few years if its a GM half ton it may not even have low range. A lot of the newer pickups have a lot lower first gear in an automatic transmission then they once did as it was common at one time for a gas engine truck or even the older diesels to just sit there and bog the engine due to the torque converter stall point and not enough torque was generated on reasonable traction to even spin a tire or get out of its own way up a steep grade and 4 low HAD to be used to get enough power to four tires to get them turning. These days traction control systems may hinder a vehicle in a situation like that although that means a tire or tires are spinning so in some ways the traction control can reduce wild spinning and anyone can correct me on that but I think some vehicles cut traction control off in low range ?.    By the sounds of it and you may have the proper equipment but if your responsible for helping vehicles out if they are not able to get out under their own power, I would say to be using a nylon tow rope or have one available so that one is able to give a bit of a run to help sling shot them some initial momentum as most tow straps are made out of polypropylene and impart way too much shock load if used to jerk a stuck vehicle into motion but are totally fine to use if going more from almost a dead pull with the tow vehicle and they are a lot less expensive to replace if damaged. That and some soft shackles to hook onto closed loop tow hooks on the truck your pulling as well as you having the proper shackle insert in your truck so there are no bad accidents with metal clevises joining things together or chain on the end of a tow rope or tow balls being hooked onto etc flying and causing damage or worse if it lets go. Its always a challenge pulling people because some are clueless and will over run the tow rope or strap and drive over it or that risk of ramming into the back of the tow vehicle so usually a few instructions are needed to clue in the driver of the stuck truck. Yeah ... have fun out there 😉
    • In their own words:    https://blog.amsoil.com/how-engine-sludge-forms-and-how-to-prevent-it-2/   [Quote] Synthetic Oil Helps Prevent Sludge Fortunately, sludge and varnish deposits are something that can be controlled. Using thermally stable synthetic base oils reduces the rate of degradation (oxidation).   Antioxidant additives further help reduce the rate of degradation. One of the most widely used is zinc dithiophosphate. Not only is it an excellent oxidation inhibitor, but it is also an outstanding anti-wear additive.   High-Quality Additives Fight Sludge Fortunately, it is possible to address many of the issues that occur after the initial oxidation stage. Additives, such as detergents and dispersants, help promote the suspension of contaminants within the oil and keep them from agglomerating.   Detergents, which are also alkaline in nature, assist in neutralizing acids generated in the sludge-building process. Antioxidant, dispersant and detergent additives are consumed during use.   To achieve maximum life expectancy, use a motor oil with high concentrations of antioxidant, dispersant and detergent additives.  [End Quote]   So quality base oil and then the last sentence above. TBN and ZDP levels matter. The one thing not covered was sufficient viscosity. Sad.     And yet we now have since API SN lower amount of them all with the only real change being a slight up tick in base oil selection. Along with lower concentrations of everything that makes oil work and lower and lower viscosity there is still an insistence on longer OCI's.    How low does the peanut butter and jelly level have to get before we say it's just white bread folded?    The new smoke and mirror treatment is the 'additives are INVISIBLE' to UOA testing with a health dose of TRUST ME.    I'm not picking on AMSOIL. This is coming from all of them. Every last one of them that abandon the low wear model in favor of the high mpg/EPA compliance model. 
    • First off use it in the way you’re more comfortable. In working in off road situations most of my life I used 4WD low range very little. In most cases when equipped I used auto 4WD. If I wanted maximum control going up and down very steep terrain  I used low range. Especially if I was driving a diesel. Same with very rutted terrain. In very muddy or snowy conditions I wanted momentum so high range worked well for that. With gravel ramps with limited traction I would try high range first. I would want smooth even increasing speed if I was fighting traction. Low range could give you too much to the wheels breaking traction trying to move. 
    • Having owned 4wd vehicle since the 1970s I find there are varying opinions on how to use 4wd, every owner is an expert in their minds.  IMO, 4LO is the appropriate gear and what I would use,  You have to feather the gas to avoid spinning tires and the lower the gear the better chance.  But like I said you will find those that think their method is best.  I live near a boat launch.  Yesterday there was a new Ford Maverick pulling out a pontoon boat almost 2x its size, they had no problems and they don't have a LO range.   True story. One winter day not long ago I was coming out of small town post office and there was a F150 4wd parked in front and was stuck foot deep snow ruts. I knew the lady so I asked her to put it in 4wd (wondering why in the middle of a 2-day snow storm she wasn't).  Her reply surprised me, "my husband" (the expert) told me not use that because it uses too much gas. She finally got unstuck spinning in 2wd which likely used more gas than not.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...