Jump to content

2014+ Leveling Kits

bcazier

By bcazier
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

TX_AT Enthusiast

TX_AT

Posted
Posted

how much do the tires stick out from the side of the wheel well? bought 33" toyo mt's, same exact truck.

They dont stick out at all. If you went with 33x12.5 your tires will be wider than mine.

esanepun.jpg

  • Replies 7.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Saleenpowr
Saleenpowr

So i put my RC 2" level kit and Toyo 295/55/20's on this weekend. Install was simple, just like on my 2011. It definitely helps to have an extra set of hands when wedging that spacer in there. 295/

Saleenpowr
Saleenpowr

Thanks. Here is one more from yesterday. Considering we're getting 8-10 inches of rain the next two days, I won't be taking any better pics soon.  

FH212
FH212

Mine is finally done! After months of research I went with the RC 2.5" level kit front only, stock rear block. 20"x9" Fuel Nutz w/ +1 offset, 33x12.50x20 Toyo M/T tires. No rubbing, No trimming, yet a

Posted Images

dustyt93 Enthusiast

dustyt93

Posted
Posted

They dont stick out at all. If you went with 33x12.5 your tires will be wider than mine.

esanepun.jpg

yeah i did get the 12.5's. Thanks for sharing though, i appreciate it

Spurshot Senior Enthusiast

Spurshot

Posted
Posted

Anyone running 325/60r18 (33.3"x13") tires with 18x9 wheel (+20 offset 5.75" backspace) on a front only level kit?

 

I figure it's a long shot, but anyone think that would work without rubbing?

 

Love the way those tires look, I'm sure it'd be fine height wise but 13" is a wide tire.

Im running 305/60-18 on stock AT 18x8.5 wheels. No leveling. No rubbing. I dont know if you can do what you're thinking. It'd be close.

BlueWrapper Enthusiast

BlueWrapper

Posted
Posted

Im running 305/60-18 on stock AT 18x8.5 wheels. No leveling. No rubbing. I dont know if you can do what you're thinking. It'd be close.

 

Yep, your new tire thread is what makes me think it might actually work. If you're getting 12.1 width under there with no level, an extra 2.5 level might allow that extra 0.9" width.

Full Lock Enthusiast

Full Lock

Posted
Posted

325s will rub just don't know where and how bad

Spurshot Senior Enthusiast

Spurshot

Posted
Posted (edited)

I put in some 3/4" lower spacers to get 1 1/2" lift. 38 1/4" front, 39 1/2" rear fender height. With the 33s it picked up the front a total of 2". I think I'm about where I want to be with it.

 

DSC_2227_zpsc43b28e6.jpg

 

DSC_2226_zps2c57427f.jpg

Edited by spurshot
  • Like 1
Full Lock Enthusiast

Full Lock

Posted
Posted

Looks good and cute pups. You'll prob have a very nice stance with a hefty load.

 

With my truck only being 1/2-3/4" higher in the rear, I know I'm going to be pointed to the sky towing or hauling a heavy load. I see helper springs in my future

Spurshot Senior Enthusiast

Spurshot

Posted
Posted

The guys at the shop were able to slip the blocks in without disconnecting anything other than the two bolts on the coilover lower attach. Didn't even take the wheels off.

 

If I'd have had my dogs with me when that blond was checking out my truck, she'd have been putty in my hand.

Jtanner129 Enthusiast

Jtanner129

Posted
Posted (edited)

2" RC Leveling Kit with 20" OE machined black wheel and 275/60R20 Falken Wild Peaks

 

IMG_7958_zps93e40e1b.jpg

 

IMG_7949_zps9bb33cb7.jpg

 

IMG_7969_zpsf5339dde.jpg

Edited by Jtanner129
TB3546 Enthusiast

TB3546

Posted
Posted

2" Rough County leveling kit, with 275/70/18 BF Goodrich TKOs. I'm contemplating getting 1/4" or 1/2" spacer plates to get a little more width. Anyone have experience with he plate spacers??

post-129878-0-69137000-1400181262_thumb.jpg

post-129878-0-69137000-1400181262_thumb.jpg

post-129878-0-69137000-1400181262_thumb.jpg

post-129878-0-69137000-1400181262_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
meyer276 Enthusiast

meyer276

Posted
Posted

I have a 2.0" skyjacker levelling kit on my sierra and want to get new wheels soon but don't know what size of tire would fit and how wide I can go without rubbing a lot. I want 18" wheels. Anybody have any ideas?

Spurshot Senior Enthusiast

Spurshot

Posted
Posted

I have a 2.0" skyjacker levelling kit on my sierra and want to get new wheels soon but don't know what size of tire would fit and how wide I can go without rubbing a lot. I want 18" wheels. Anybody have any ideas?

 

You can get 305/60-18 (marked 12.50x33, actual 12.1x32.64) tires on stock RT5 All Terrain wheels (18x8.5) without rubbing. see this thread. http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/161086-cooper-st-maxx-30560-18-121x326-18-no-levellift/

Guapoh Enthusiast

Guapoh

Posted
Posted

Here is my truck with 1.5" level kit with 285/55/20 Terra Grapplers and factory mudflaps.

That looks great.

Spurshot Senior Enthusiast

Spurshot

Posted
Posted

Looks good and cute pups. You'll prob have a very nice stance with a hefty load.

 

With my truck only being 1/2-3/4" higher in the rear, I know I'm going to be pointed to the sky towing or hauling a heavy load. I see helper springs in my future

 

I still have a snugtop Hi-Liner Sport and a set of aluminum bed drawers to put on the truck. That's about 400 lbs total.

 

The pups are some great bird dogs. The white pointer is a George Hickox dog out of 3 hall of fame trial dogs lineage. Amazing to watch her work. I've gone out without a gun just to let her find birds.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined

  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 443 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...