Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

What is in the GTO or how heavy is that trailer to be 8500lbs?

 

Tyler

 

7500lbs Tyler, GTO 3900 w/ cage, 3200 on the trailer and 55 gallon of VP in the bed

Posted

Has anyone tries 33x12.50r20 on stock 20 in wheels with a 2 in leveling kit?

it will rub...

i have 33X12.50X20 on 2.5" level and it barely rubs the sway bar at full turn...nothing else

Posted

Ok, I'll start looking there then. Do you have a pic of the work your buddy did? Just to see how it turned out.

987dd23230447e10cb07a0463539d4c1.jpg

 

 

Sent from your sister's house

  • Like 1
Posted

7500lbs Tyler, GTO 3900 w/ cage, 3200 on the trailer and 55 gallon of VP in the bed

 

Nice! What are the specs on the GTO (the more detail the better). I still keep in touch of the guy who bought my 06 in case I ever want it back (sometimes I do).

 

Tyler

Posted

Has anyone tries 33x12.50r20 on stock 20 in wheels with a 2 in leveling kit?

I'm running them. ToyoAT2. They're heavy tires. I have the 6.2 and the tires have affected fuel mileage but look and ride great. Great off road performance. Slight rubbing on sway bar at full lock.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

 

Can you post up some front on and rear look pics? Those x10s and the -24 offset make those 285s look really big!

Sorry about the delay. This somehow slipped through the cracks, but here ya go. d9aab0c8d662336caa60862fd998ae1a.jpg53b83b9023b603f453d317264c842070.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

I'm running them. ToyoAT2. They're heavy tires. I have the 6.2 and the tires have affected fuel mileage but look and ride great. Great off road performance. Slight rubbing on sway bar at full lock.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

And you only have the 2in leveling kit and not the 2.5 right?

Posted (edited)

53b83b9023b603f453d317264c842070.jpg

 

 

That's a big looking 285!!

 

 

 

Nice! What are the specs on the GTO (the more detail the better). I still keep in touch of the guy who bought my 06 in case I ever want it back (sometimes I do).

Tyler

 

Boooo! This is a truck forum....talk about cars somewhere else.

Edited by bcbz71
Posted

Picked this one up on the 4th of July! Just broke 1700 miles, this is a world of change from my 09 LT with 143K!!!

 

 

post-121883-0-16889700-1470924120_thumb.jpg

post-121883-0-16889700-1470924120_thumb.jpg

post-121883-0-16889700-1470924120_thumb.jpg

post-121883-0-16889700-1470924120_thumb.jpg

  • Like 4
Posted

That's a big looking 285!!

 

It's essentially a 32.6" x 11.2" tire, so not much different then a 33x12.5. I am very happy with the look and heard nothing but good things about the trail grapplers.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Picked this one up on the 4th of July! Just broke 1700 miles, this is a world of change from my 09 LT with 143K!!!

 

 

Nice A/T in that blue color, how does you hunting buddy like the new ride so far?

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,173 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...